September 25

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 14:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Town DE imp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete Redundant to {{Infobox Town DE}} now that optional parameters for imperial measurements have now been included in that template - Bob 22:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Markussep 08:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 14:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GEDSBSchoolsDefunct (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extremely limited use template for articles that could simply be included under Category:Defunct schools. The template is not necessary for any informational or navigational purpose. No similar template seems to exist for any other schools in any other school district or area. Agent 86 22:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep per WP:SNOWBALL. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ann anime (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

spamming templates Zuhnny 21:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Zuhnny (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was tentatively keep. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 14:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Globalize/Catholic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is unused, and also violates WP:NPOV. This is the only Christian denomination with its own "Globalize" template, and there is already a {{Globalize/Christianity}} tag (which itself is only used on one article) that could serve just as well. Delete. Aaron 20:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. This template does not violate WP:NPOV. A similar template dealing with the Muslim world was reccomended for deletion and ended up staying. The log for that particular template is located here. Chrisbrl88 05:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note to closing admin: That "debate" (which got exactly one comment) includes a link to direct proof that some of these "Globalize" series of templates are intentional WP:POINT violations. --Aaron 16:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am not sure that I understand how tagging an article as having a Catholic point of view violates NPOV. In fact tagging such an article should have the result that it is editted up to Wikipedia standards of neutral pint of view. It may be true that the {{Globalize/Christianity}} tag is adequate, but given the large number of articles that are taken directly from the public domain Catholic Encyclopedia, some thought might be put to its employment. But I am chastened by Mango's comment on Sept. 22nd that while it is important "to warn about a neutrality issue, but {{NPOV}} should just be used in those cases. Having specific issues raised on the article page is an inappropriate level of criticism." I agree that such issues should be raised on the talk page, and that all-too-frequently editors place templates on pages without detailing the issues on the talk page. Will the use of such templates as this assist us? Yes, if the editors don't otherwise describe the problems. No, if we can be a conscientious, detail-oriented group of editors, especially when placing templates. Bejnar 03:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

French commune infoboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 14:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:French commune COM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:French commune PF (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:French commune NC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete Redundant to the expanded {{French commune}} template. They are also unused. Bob 18:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:League of Ireland teamlist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Template:FAI League already exists and has been used for several years. This new template does not carry as much information and, IMO, is not layed out as well. There is absolutely no need for it Dodge 09:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:NDT and CSD #G4. >Radiant< 21:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:May Offend (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Nominated by User:Clawed without a nomination reason. --ais523 13:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, as there doesn't seem to be a nom reason I'll place one here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored. Disclaimers seem to have been deleted here historically, as well (I won't repeat the arguments now, as that will probably be done by the other contributors). --ais523 13:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, serves no use that doesn't violate guidelines at Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates. In the alternative, place it on every article in Wikipedia, as anything may offend someone!  :) -- Xtifr tälk 14:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Save, This template does not censor, it simply serves as a warning for articles that may offend. Also provides a compromise when someone complains of objectionable images, sparking a talk war. Look at the talk page for feces and you'll see what I mean. Wikipedia has warnings when there are spoilers for a movie, why not let people know that they might see a picture of a steaming pile of shit when they scroll down? That was the intent behind this template - to let people know they might see something they wont like. It does not censor in any way. Chrisbrl88 20:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Xtifr. --Aaron 20:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLB team2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 16:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLB see also (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Angels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Astros (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Athletics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Blue Jays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Braves (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Brewers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Cardinals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Cubs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Devil Rays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Diamondbacks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Dodgers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Giants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Indians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Mariners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Marlins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Mets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Orioles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Padres (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Pirates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Rangers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Red Sox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Reds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Rockies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Royals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Tigers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Twins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also White Sox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:MLB see also Yankees (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.