April 20

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Secretary of State (US State) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is unused and has been replaced by Template:Infobox US Cabinet official. — Philip Stevens 19:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Chief Minister (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is unused and has been replaced by Template:Infobox Politician. — Philip Stevens 19:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite mailinglist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Obsoleted by {{Cite mailing list}}. grendel|khan 16:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete If it's obsolete, delete :). Jmlk17 19:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wonder why you created the other one - did you just not know about the first one? Anyway, redirect to whichever one is more comprehensive. Quarl (talk) 2007-04-21 08:46Z
  • Merge edit histories if necessary, then redirect. –Pomte 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - I think that a redirect should be done for convenience, and frankly, why not? "Redirects are cheap"—my new favorite quote. And my other, more pressing question: why is {{cite mailing list}} needed, as it adds little functionality to {{cite web}}? Is it semantic? Does Grendelkhan intend on making it more unlike the latter soon, if that's possible? GracenotesT § 01:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't foresee any significant changes to the template that would distinguish it from {{cite web}}. However, not all mailing lists are published on the web, so this is a good semantic reason. All the other cite templates are similar enough anyway that I don't know why we don't combine them into one huge {{cite}}. –Pomte 00:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AD character (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

replaced show specific character infobox with {{Infobox character}} --TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 13:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Top Ten Films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"personal top ten of films of "Alan Iverson" ??? I suspect User:Riverdepp is related in some way to this filmmaker, but i cannot know for sure of course. Clear example of what Wikipedia is not however. --TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 13:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fair City1 Character (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No context, not used. — Punkmorten 08:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various WMATA templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WMATA Red Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Green Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Orange Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Blue Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Yellow Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Silver Line color (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA Rosslyn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA station (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA one line to three (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA one line to two (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA station footer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA station header (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA station row (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA three line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA two line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:WMATA two lines to one (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Deprecated, replaced by s-rail and station infobox templates. — SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Routeboxca2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Including {{routeboxca}} and subpages of both templates) Obsolete, unused except for on demo pages, now depracated — Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, there was a previous nomination. However, the circumstances are different here. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
North - the {{prod}} template is not used for template deletions - only articles -- master_sonTalk - Edits 03:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see that now... but I've used it successfully on a template before here. -- NORTH talk 07:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.