December 30

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete (CSD G2) by admin Mattinbgn. Non-admin closure. JPG-GR (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User thelema (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Useless, one red link to the same named page in mainspace.. RichardΩ612 20:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JollyModInorgChem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Broken hard-coded cite, a template consisting of a template!. RichardΩ612 20:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Stop clogging up TFD with crappy nominations, all these templates do no harm by being kept. Pollo9087 (talk) 20:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nousernameslefttalk and matrix? 20:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. JPG-GR (talk) 22:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's not broken (look at the includeonly code), and I substituted its only use. For those interested, see VPT for how this could be useful. For now, we can't handle organizing one template per citation though. –Pomte 00:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This template is completely unnecessary. Subseting was the correct step. --Farix (Talk) 03:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per TheFarix. Happymelon 18:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I am responsible for this template, obviously I made some technical error in setting up the template but I will try to fix it (unless it gets deleted). Over at the chemistry desk more people have started templates for the single purpose of generating references, there is even a category devoted to it: Category:Chemistry citation templates !. Do you people have a problem with this procedure as a whole, the fact that the template has a technical problem or that the template is used once? With respect to the last point, the reference is a general chemistry reference I have intended to use more often in response to numerous requests for references in chemistry articles. Please try to get a speedy verdict, I am not going to waste my time fact checking without the proper tools V8rik (talk) 18:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. I have an issue with creating a template to display a citation. The citation template is easy enough to type out; if you feel you will use this specific cite regularly, feel free to move it to your userspace and subst: it when you use it. Layers of unsubst:'ed [dynamic] templates put more load on the servers. ><RichardΩ612 18:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep after explanation by V8rik. Can propose substitution rather than transclusion at the chemistry desk or some other appropriate place. Better in templatespace than userspace since multiple people can use it. Richard0612: don't worry about the server to the extent that other editors' work gets impeded. –Pomte 07:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was userfy. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I Know My Place (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Userfy or delete as nonsense. RichardΩ612 19:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of CoolThreads Application Tuning Artciles published by Sun (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Pointless list of links to PDF files that could be spammy and is useless at best, it can be subst:'ed onto the two articles it is used in. RichardΩ612 19:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Each list can be maintained separately, but they don't have to be. Deletion just makes it more annoying for editors trying to maintain the articles, and others who may not know to ensure consistency across the two articles. –Pomte 04:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is it useless? Clearly not spam as they provide information about the subjects from the official source. It may be excessive, but by definition not spam. –Pomte 04:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LEB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Do we need a template that inserts a [massive] image? More WP:LAZINESS. RichardΩ612 19:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Animrophs characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Just a list of names with no links; even with them the template would be redundant. RichardΩ612 19:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted as WP:CSD#T2 - runaround for GFDL non-compliance. SkierRMH (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:© 2004-2007 Glad Enterprises Co., Ltd. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Useless boilerplate text, possible spamming uses. RichardΩ612 19:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 00:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Babel-7 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant to Template:Babel. RichardΩ612 19:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted per G3 - attack, with a bit of G1 & G2 as well. SkierRMH (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox regular person (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No idea why this exists, but it definitely shouldn't. RichardΩ612 18:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pyeongtaek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nav template in which only one link works and I doubt whether the other pages are going to be created, or meet WP:V if they ever were. RichardΩ612 18:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7/WP:CSD#G4 ˉˉanetode╦╩ 04:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Euro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Do we really need a template to insert an image?. RichardΩ612 18:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No we don't. Delete it. -  .    . 18:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox LBS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unnecessary hard-coding of Template:Infobox University. Can be subst:'ed where appropriate. RichardΩ612 18:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was userfy and delete. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Houses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm not sure where or why this would be used but it definitely shouldn't be in the Template: namespace.. RichardΩ612 17:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I don't have a vendetta, I am just clearing out the rubbish that builds up. And FYI, I do contribute to articles, it is fairly uncommon for one editor to write a whole article. ><RichardΩ612 18:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per G7. SkierRMH (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Black Rock-High Rock NCA and Wilderness Map (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template masquerading as content. Very WP:LAZY.. RichardΩ612 17:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Babel-6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Should be in userspace if it should exist at all: it is a template consisting of a template.. RichardΩ612 17:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted by User:Hu12 per CSD I1. Non-admin closure. ><RichardΩ612 18:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Troutslap (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What... the...? Userfy or delete as nonsense.. RichardΩ612 17:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted by User:Anetode per CSD G2 Non-admin closure. ><RichardΩ612 17:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:This is the veiw of Maira Amirabad taken from Let Amirabad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Useless template with a longer name than the wikilink it replaces! Preferably Speedy delete it as a snowball.. RichardΩ612 17:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was withdrawn. --- RockMFR 23:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deferwps (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This can be easily typed out manually, templates are not to be used for laziness!. RichardΩ612 17:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nominations should not be made based on WP:IDONTLIKEIT. This was created for use on the "system administration" page MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist, implemented for use by Administrators who are unfamiliar with appropriate blacklist requests/removals responses. This is designed to address listing request, that do meet blacklisting criteria, but do require attention. Because the blacklist affects every page on the English Wikipedia. Additions to this list can cause damage to wikipedia on a wide scale. Any administrator can edit the spam blacklist, however not all (1,450) admins are familiar whith the apropriate protocal. A templated option provides order and protection, while preventing wide scale disruption.--Hu12 (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn. OK, I can see that a template would be useful in this instance, but I didn't make this nomination on not liking it I made it on the belief [that at the time I thought was correct] that it was redundant. ><RichardΩ612 18:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. thanks Richard--Hu12 (talk) 18:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pirates of the Caribbean character (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant to {{infobox character}}.. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was subst and delete. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Kill Bill Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant to {{Infobox Organization}}. Used only in two articles.. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wayfinding (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is used in very few articles and can easily be replaced with {{Non-free symbol}} or {{Non-free logo}}. Many of the image pages which currently use the template are double-tagged with another non-free tag, which further shows its unnecessity. — –Dream out loud (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.