January 22

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfied ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nuclear Bomb Supporter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Potentially offensive and certainly not appropriate for the template namespace.--Azer Red Si? 23:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this is a form of censorship if it is deleted. So what it might offend someone, if someone decides to place this on their user page then let them.--Lucy-marie 23:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now been userfied by myself so please de-list--Lucy-marie 00:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 00:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lustra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Little to no added value from this box. Does not point to valid links - mostly red links. AirOdyssey (Talk) 12:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 01:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Economy of Angola table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Was only used on Economy of Angola. I substed it there, since I wanted to be able to use <ref> tags. Superm401 - Talk 08:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 01:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mercury Template (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The template is better covered by the Template:Mercury Timeline, (30 vs 20 years); this one isn't even standarised. -- NaBUru38 20:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.