< May 3 May 5 >

May 4

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Nominated before, deletion suggested despite no input. // Pilotguy hold short 00:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BTAS screenshot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template has no use anymore due to recent removals of all screenshots from episode lists on Wikipedia due to the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Removal of images from lists of episodes 07:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the images were removed from the episode list, but they are used in the episode articles.--T-man, the wise 08:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these images were removed from the episode pages by OrphanBot due to "no source information." I'm not sure what source information is needed for a screenshot, since either way it is copyrighted and can be used only under a claim of fair use. Is it simply necessary to say "I took this screenshot from x media"? Incidentally, where did these come from, anyway? They look clear enough to have come from a DVD, but they're at odd resolutions that don't match either the native resolution of the DVD or any normal scaling ratio thereof. *** Crotalus *** 08:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Family Guy episode (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete because the template is just a show specific fork of {{Infobox Television episode}}. All uses have been replaced. Jay32183 22:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, redundant. Orderinchaos 11:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MelbourneBusCompany (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Now redundant template, has been merged into Template:MelbournePublicTransport. — Thewinchester (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, redundant. Orderinchaos 11:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MelbourneBuses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Now redundant template, has been merged into Template:MelbournePublicTransport. — Thewinchester (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeete // Pilotguy hold short 00:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Portugal Squad 2004 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Portugal Squad 2000 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Portugal Squad 1996 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete per discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 11, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football etc - squad templates are kept for only champions, World Cup finals and current squads. — Ytny (talk) 13:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scotland Squad 1996 European Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Latvia Squad Euro 2004 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:France Squad 1992 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:France Squad 1996 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:France Squad 2004 European Football Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Croatia Squad 1996 European Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Hong Kong Squad 2003 East Asian Cup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Matthew_hk tc 12:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Steve (Stephen) talk 03:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an external link template for the Vote Smart Project. Barely in use and not necessary. >Radiant< 11:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree with Radiant Flubeca 18:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I created it on the model of {{CongBio}} and {{CongBio2}}. It has not been used, however. Not yet. It could be applied on every current member of U.S. Congress and Senator.—Markles 20:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Yes it could be used, but will it? We shall see. Jmlk17 20:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, man! I'm too lazy to do it myself. I'll try to use it on a dozen or so articles in the next week or so. OK?—Markles 21:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, at your veiled suggestion, I've applied it to a few articles and I encourage you all to join in. Can we keep the template, now?—Markles 13:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Anything to help understand the politicians' stand on issues and voting record is good. As for barely in use, it just means we have to go around and put it on pages. It can be hard to know it exists until we spread it around. A big problem with Wikipedia is the large around of esoteric information that you have to figure out as you go along but it can be worth it. Can we get the "The template below has been proposed for deletion" thing removed? Fanra 02:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable release/Office.com (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Latest preview release/Office.com (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Associated with article Office.com which was deleted via prod. Templates where not actually used on article and are not really useful even if article wasn't deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. –Pomte 20:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:InvaderZimWikiProject (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is for a WikiProject which has since been merged as a taskforce for another project. It has been removed from all articles. I suggest a speedy delete. — ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 00:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Steve (Stephen) talk 02:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Rhodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Rhodes is just a Greek island, with Greek citizens and the same status as the rest of the islands and mainland Greece. It's not a country but only a greek prefecture! This template was created for some Rhodes football team which was called national without any reason. The included flag is probably fictional as putting any sign on the Flag of Greece is forbidden by law. — geraki 15:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Rhodes flag is probably OR - couldn't find any at Google Images. Orderinchaos 07:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.