November 19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Senators of the 109th Congress (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A similar template to this was deleted last year ({{109th Senate}}). It's not useful. —Markles 23:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep As an historical object, it provides a context for all Senators sitting at the same time. A model for all of the Senate sessions, if allowed to develop.
  • Is there a similar reference list anywhere on wikipedia? If so, point it out.
  • On the objection of taking space on the bottom of a page, especially for individuals with long terms in office (mentioned on the talk page for {{Senators of the 110th Congress}}, a single line show-box / hide-box could be made that holds all of the relevent sessions information. And inside that layer, a set of single-line show boxes, one for each Congress. The interested may open the show box, other readers may pass it by.
    -- Yellowdesk (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there are similar links throughout wikipedia. For example, {{Super Bowl I}}, {{Super Bowl II}}, etc. Wikidemo (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Senators of the 110th Congress (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A similar template to this was deleted last year ({{110th Senate}}). It's not useful. —Markles 23:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep For the same reasons stated for the 109th congress discussion above:

As an historical object, it provides a context for all Senators sitting at the same time. A model for all of the Senate sessions, if allowed to develop.

    • Is there a similar reference list anywhere on wikipedia? If so, point it out.
    • On the objection of taking space on the bottom of a page, especially for individuals with long terms in office (mentioned on the talk page for {{Senators of the 110th Congress}}, a single line show-box / hide-box could be made that holds all of the relevent sessions information. And inside that layer, a set of single-line show boxes, one for each Congress. The interested may open the show box, other readers may pass it by.
      -- Yellowdesk (talk) 17:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copyright N Shaw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Procedural nom: this was mistakenly placed at WP:MFD, so I've moved it to here. The orginal nom reads:

This template creates a slightly personalized version of the {{GFDL-self}} template for use by a single editor. This template should be deleted and its use on image uploads replaced with the {{GFDL-user}} template. --Kralizec! (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

As this nom is procedural only, I abstain--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 21:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - GFDL-self, with appropriate note (not disclaimer) is the correct use here. Also, image history shows the uploader for each version, so noting such in a template is redundant. Was used on one image (fixed)- now redundant.SkierRMH (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:English Premier League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Tempate has been superceded by {{British ice hockey}}. Template not used in any articles. — Flibirigit (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, test. BencherliteTalk 23:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gaming Wikia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused template; apparent test edit by new user.. ~Matticus UC 10:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nations in 2007 Southeast Asian Games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template is redundant, another infobox is in use with other NOC results pages for the 2005 and some 2007 articles -- Template:Nationsin2007SEAG ---RebSkii 03:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 02:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article ends (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This template purports to separate the "article" from "the other things". It changes the colors used in the article, without regard for skins/themes. It creates invalid HTML - the <div> is never closed. And the creator's idea of where the article ends and everybody else's is different – the parts he/she marks as "outside" the article are key components of it. — RossPatterson (talk) 02:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user also created Template:Article-ends as a redirect, it should be kept or deleted with its target. RossPatterson (talk) 02:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 02:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Movies Ari Alexander Ergis Magnússon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No need for a template on the films of a director who has made a single film. — BD2412 T 02:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 02:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Punk metal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Takes up space. Although the genres listed are real, "punk metal" is a dumb, and non-existent term. — DragonDance (talk) 01:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 02:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia users (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete - Unused navbox.. After Midnight 0001 00:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.