December 10

edit


LS2004-constituency

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template. Has trivial content about election results of particular year in particular Constituency. Used only in 1 page (constituency) and at times in state results page. The data has been substituted into the page or subpage has been created and used as template. Hence delete these templates and 1 category. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 17:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete --The Helpful One 11:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Whole Day Edit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A self-reference. And a bossy one at that. This kind of thing shouldn't be visible to readers. If the message is necessary it should be done with invisible HTML comments. Flowerparty 10:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Happymelon 18:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Herb and spice mixtures (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template. I am nominating this because it is no longer used on any article and the redirect is unneeded as such. Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 09:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Absolutely keep - Template was consolidated by proposing editor into a huge, unmanageable quite against consensus several months ago. Go back, develop consensus for the consolidation, then this proposal would be proper. Badagnani (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - There has been no call for restoration of these templates since the time they were modified into redirects, or of the single use template that replaced them. They have laid unused since July, 2008. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 22:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Happymelon 18:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Herbs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template. I am nominating this because it is no longer used on any article and the redirect is unneeded as such. Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 09:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Happymelon 18:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spices (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template. I am nominating this because it is no longer used on any article and the redirect is unneeded as such. Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 09:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink (← links)
  2. Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Herbs and Spices task force (← links)
  3. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Herbs and Spices task force (← links)
  4. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink (← links)
That's kind of the definition of 'unused'. //roux   00:48, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Happymelon 18:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Associations/Orders of magnitude (time) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ordersofmagnitudeseconds gives the same data and is all the same pages, also this template needs less work than the other to fix. Zginder 2008-12-10T03:17Z (UTC)

Delete. And remove its usage in related pages. Template:Ordersofmagnitudeseconds is already present on the pages where Template:Associations/Orders of magnitude (time) is used. Also, the latter has some redundant links, like 1 E-15 s, 1 E-14 s and 1 E-13 s which all point to 1 E-15 s. These have been elegantly linked in the former navbox template. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 05:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete JPG-GR (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Own wiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, used on no pages. Redundant to external links section in any case. roux   02:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Stale
 – no comment but mine.
--Encyclopedia77 Talk 00:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.