December 19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 07:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Biased (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant with NPOV and other neutrality templates, and the wording "appears to represent" prejudges the issue, and is biased. Ray (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant. JPG-GR (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:German Empire 1871-1918 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template lists only the last three monarchs of Germany which seems pointless as {{German monarchs}} lists them all. It also is an unstandard design and size. Basically this template is ugly and messy and is bested b another template and multiple templates all showing the same information look so messey on articles. The Quill (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete JPG-GR (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chinese Language Television (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was created in 2006 to link articles about tv channels in chinese language, when there were only an handful of them. it progressively became huge and messy, and was split in four different templates in september. now it's only a group of templates, but I don't think we really need a template just for listing other templates. other than that, it's used only in 3 articles today. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 09:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 07:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:8 Largest SM Supermalls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't really need to have a template that states the 9 largest malls of the company, because another template lists all the malls they own. Hence, it is not very notable to list just 9 of them. Xeltran (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 08:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TDIS1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar cast templates have been deleted, such as {{Teenage Robot}}. I believe that such cast templates should be removed, as rarely is one person associated primarily with any given series. Remove the cast and you only have the characters and episodes lists, not nearly enough for a template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 03:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.