Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 25
December 25
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Unused template Gnevin (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
This template duplicates the "section" functionality of the existing template {{current bill}}. It was created in October 2008, and it is redundant. Yellowdesk (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Usage of cold war in combination with ships which are normally used in a civil context is questionable. If a timeline is intended it should be referenced using years. Inwind (talk) 13:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Template:CGSTeams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
All the teams have been merged as per the AfD. Template no longer needed. DanielRigal (talk) 13:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - As much as I don't agree with the merging all of the articles and how it was handled, if that is the case, then I agree with the deletion of this template. ~ digx t·c 16:08, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.