January 10

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete user request (CSD G7) by User:AliveFreeHappy. Non-admin close. JPG-GR (talk) 02:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:DodgerOfZion/Richardson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A userbox. Gov. Richardson has dropped his bid for the White House. As the user that created the template, I request its deletion. DodgerOfZion (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as patent nonsense (CSD G1) by User:SkierRMH. Non-admin close. JPG-GR (talk) 02:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StatusUnclassified (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Just a take a look at it. Moreover it's orphan. — Magioladitis (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete - though I think this is actually a fairly conservative interpretation of WP:CSD#G6, along with existing consensus at the AFD that this seems to have simply been left out of. —Random832 16:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Exeter Bus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I suspect this infobox was part of the a series of deleted articles. It is no longer in use and I think we can delete it.. --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 13:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. WoohookittyWoohoo! 01:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timefact (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant and strange version of {{fact}}, only serves to ruin standardisation and advertise a minor wikiproject. Recreation of the (simply redirected by me) Template:Histfact. — Vanished user talk 09:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The templates used at WP:TIMET clearly reflect the guidance to provide sources specifically related with historical timelines or chronologically described facts. That is the main purpose of the project and the templates accomplish such a purpose. These are not accessory templates but the main tools of the project and therefore needed for its goal. The proposal by Vanished user, including the incongruent "advertise a minor wikiproject" perspective, are part of a discrediting campaign driven by Vanished user against the project. It seems that this is one more action based on Cuerden's animosity against editors who happen to be WP:TIMET members but who contradict him on their own and not as representatives of this project. Vanished user has been repeatedly cautioned previously (see User_talk:Adam_Cuerden#POV wars and User_talk:Adam_Cuerden#Please_refrain_from_pursuing_the_wrong_target). This type of behavior is perhaps a sequel of the pending arbitration Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Matthew_Hoffman/Proposed_decision#... RfA possible too. Beyond these facts, the template is not a recreation as it was created long ago and the template has a clear use in guiding to the kind of Reliable Sources needed at the place or article where the template is placed Daoken 10:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Hard-coded Weatherboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete all. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Falkirk weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Nairobi weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Austin weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) — added 17:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:College Station weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) — added 17:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Dallas weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) — added 18:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Houston weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 01:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Houston weatherbox small (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 01:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Lubbock weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) — added 02:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Template:Marshall weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)— added 03:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Single use replaced with a standard infobox. — MJCdetroit (yak) 03:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.