January 6

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ORHistory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A template Templates that was decided on by Oregon Project participants consensus already exists Template:Oregon Early History. — Awotter (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Musical notes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A better template already exists at Template:Semitones. There's also a bit of bias with this template as most of the English world doesn't use Fixed Do (so saying D is Re, for example, isn't true for many people). — Torc2 (talk) 23:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. Can't be substed due to GFDL, not needed, removed from talk pages. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:09F9-notice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hasn't been a problem for months, and prominent notices telling people not to do something only encourage it – Gurch 20:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This template is the second result for Googling "09F9", after the EFF's page @ http://www.09f9.com/. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 06:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete G6. Versageek 02:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Off-project (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WikiProject talk page tag for a WikiProject which no longer exists.. —  MusicMaker5376 20:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sailor-Moon-stub-List (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Was previously nominated for deletion on 4 January 2007 with no consensus. Template is currently unused and at a minimum should be renamed to make clear that it is not a stub template. — Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Russia Infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:United States Infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Single-use hard coded infobox. Only use has been subst:'ed. RichardΩ612 15:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stargate Atlantis Regulars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Also nominating

Template:Stargate Atlantis Recurring (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Stargate SG-1 regulars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Recurring characters on Stargate SG-1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These templates got replaced with {{Stargate Characters}}, which basically does the same job better but better with less space because there is so much overlap in the shows. Already orphaned. – sgeureka t•c 12:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't these just be speedied under T3? --Tango (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It will once T3 stops being "proposed" - give it a fortnight and it'll be policy :D. Happymelon 19:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You make an excellent point... --Tango (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Upper Paleolithic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused; linked only to talk pages. Replaced by {{Pleistocene}}coldacid (Talk|Contrib) 07:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Nairobi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Single use. Replaced by {{Infobox Settlement}}MJCdetroit (talk) 05:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 04:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Montreal weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Loreto weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Accra weatherbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Unused; no links. It was single use at one time. — MJCdetroit (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was userfy. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User USCG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Orphaned. Been here a year and no one is using it. Userfy if need be.. -- ALLSTARecho 01:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.