June 25

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Only warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Less precise (and less attractive) version of {{Uw-vandalism4im}} MBisanz talk 07:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Merge to better titled {{Uw-english}} keeping the good variables MBisanz talk 07:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No personal headings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Odd template that I don't see reflected in policy, or used in current warning systems, if its true, its probably the most breached policy in existence. MBisanz talk 07:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is it out of line? Hyacinth (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Like the nom said, it isn't reflected in current policy; it's your interpretation. Personal headings are not necessarily personal attacks. Viriditas (talk) 11:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all. Wikipedia:No personal attacks: "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Hyacinth (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NPA doesn't say anything about using headings as attacks, and not all names in headings are attacks. I think I'm repeating myself. Viriditas (talk) 09:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason for deletion? Hyacinth (talk) 00:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Userfied-nn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Less effective version of {{Userfied2}} not in current Test/UTM system MBisanz talk 07:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Always like to see user responsibility :) WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A B Spellings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Less appropriate version of the {{Uw-lang}} and {{Lang0}}-{{Lang4}}, rather specific and unused in current systems MBisanz talk 07:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]