Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 17
March 17
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant template. Only blue links are the singer's two albums, both of which are linked to each other.. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At the moment it's not very helpful. The JPStalk to me 22:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It effectively has only two links at the moment. Maybe when (if, providing they meet WP:NOTE and the other criteria for inclusion) all the albums have wikilinks it can be recreated. PeterSymonds | talk 17:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As with the KelvinToCelsius templates mentioned below this is unused & redundant.
There's a redirect from the misspelling too. Delete them all. Jɪmp 17:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as orphaned and deprecated template. PeterSymonds | talk 17:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 05:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Copied from Uncyclopedia, where it's used as a prank. Doesn't work, and never will. Sikon (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete – WP:CSD#G4, see discussion from last February. Little has changed since then: we don't have JavaScript support for it and don't plan on adding any; implementing it with MediaWiki still has problems. GracenotesT § 17:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Though I'm not prejudiced against Uncyclopedia or any other Wiki, this particular template is not appropriate for Wikipedia. PeterSymonds | talk 17:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.