November 30

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Merge. The text of the template has been placed on the talk page of the template it has been requested to have been merged with. This template will now be deleted. RyanGerbil10(Four more years!) 01:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:All-rounders-Triple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Has no real purpose except to add clutter to the handful of articles linked. It is a partial and unnecessary duplicate of Template:All-rounders-Double (which is useful). Pointless. ---BlackJack | talk page 21:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge. It would be easy to asterisk the names of the handful who have the "triple" (so named) and add a line explaining the asterisk at the bottom of the "double" template (Vettori will hopefully join the group very soon). The triple usually means 1000 runs, 100 wickets, and 100 catches anyway. Grutness...wha? 22:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was subst and delete --Magioladitis (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:My Girl character map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary as a template, and only one transclusion. Doesn't look particuarly useful anyway; the article already has a cast list, and it isn't really relevant to know who played who in the remake, which has its own article. PC78 (talk) 19:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --The Helpful One 21:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKLobbies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

consists entirely of American lobbies with no UK lobbying organization included. Hence unencyclopedic/ gibberish/irrelevant/misleading or whatever you will. But shouldn't be up in Wikipedia. Delete Smerus (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also by the way it only links to one article.--Smerus (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.