October 22

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep --WoohookittyWoohoo! 12:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-art-georgia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, {{pd-art}} can take parameters now. ViperSnake151 20:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But then again, Template:PD-Georgia redirects to {{PD-old-70}} on Commons, so its assumed by that setup that Georgia uses 70 years P.M.A. like a whole lot of other countries. ViperSnake151 19:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The way it is now, it looks like PD-art-georgia can be used for images that are in the public domain in Georgia, but whose creator died less than 70 years ago. PD-old-70 does not apply in that case. Is there an alternative for that situation? Pagrashtak 20:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Fakes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough content for a template, just an album and two probably non-notable EPs. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 18:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Garion96 (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jingguang Stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See this. Another unused template full of redlinks. Enigma message 15:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Garion96 (talk) 20:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editorial cartoon reference (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in only one article. Each call there has an url and would be better served by {{Cite web}}, which has better formatting. {{Cite comic}} may also be a possible substitute, as the url parameter was recently added. Pagrashtak 14:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FF class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It occurs only once. It also seems to be not that useful in the article which is transcluded. Magioladitis (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under G7: author requested deletion. ~ L'Aquatique[talk] 00:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Snack Foods (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A very vague and random list masquerading as a template. No rules of inclusion. Really any snack food could be included. Pointless. WoohookittyWoohoo! 04:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Maxim(talk) 21:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pittsburgh Penguins seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The content of this template has been merged into Template:Pittsburgh Penguins, it is redundant to keep both. Blackngold29 03:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.