October 6

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 03:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Treason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Separate sock template for a singular user, created by a user with a history of bad template making. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 19:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 03:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JarlaxleArtemis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Do we really need a separate 'this user has been blocked indefinitely" for just one user, even one as problematic as this? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 19:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Galactic Civil War (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These now just redirect to the movie articles. (Individual event articles were plot summaries of excruciating detail.) --EEMIV (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scouting Sections Infobox‎ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer in use, deprecated by {{Infobox WorldScouting}}. —— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 15:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was G7 by Redvers, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 19:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008–09 WHL season by team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template was supposed to link to seasons of a junior hockey league, the two articles that were already created have both fallen to AFD and Prod, as such there is no need for the template. Djsasso (talk) 14:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. delldot ∇. 02:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Simpsons character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is specific to only The Simpsons and Template:Infobox character can get the job done just as good making this template redundant. Mythdon (talk) 09:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The coloring is very easy. The generic template supports "color" :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Several of these characters have appeared in both The Simpsons and the Tracey Ullman Show shorts, so the current template allows for the first appearances in both shows to be easily displayed. You can say that the parameter could be included in a generic template, but then it would have to be "First appearance in the Tracey Ullman Shorts" and that is too long. The current one looks better than a generic one possibly could. As well, the generic template contains several fields that we really don't want to go to, including episode count, nicknames, age (which caused a LOT of edit wars when the field was on this template), nationality, religion, date of birth/death and created by. I can guarantee that these fields would cause edit wars if the fans could add them to pages. -- Scorpion0422 14:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.