May 25

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TheRedgraveFamily (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is barely a template, it is just a group of links that are already contained in the article on which this template was used (Vanessa Redgrave) and has no other function. We don't have templates for actors and there are no other existing "family" templates of which I'm aware. I see no purpose for it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - not used anywhere, and shouldn't be. This can be added into an article directly, but generally family information should be written out as text anyway. Robofish (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not a useful template and contains so little information that it should be placed directly in articles that need it. |→ Spaully 16:40, 29 May 2009 (GMT)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:J. R. Writer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G8 as parent article was just deleted, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 01:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Only one album by rap artist Cosprings (talk) 15:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-tjp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer used in any article. Also, Template:Chinese and Template:Chinese-inline can do everything that this template does. - Alan (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-tsijp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer used in any article. Also, Template:Chinese and Template:Chinese-inline can do everything that this template does. - Alan (talk) 12:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-j (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template does nothing more than adding a link to the Jyutping article. I don't think it is too hard to type [[ ]] that we need a template to do a link. Also, the template is no longer used in any article.
- Alan (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Latest preview software release/Pidgin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was nominator close as keep ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 18:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pidgin doesn't have "preview" releases so this page is unnecessary ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 08:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Muse awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was previously being transcluded into Muse (band) which is against Wikipedia:Template namespace#Usage. "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article." kollision (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Harry James Angus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates to too few articles. —Justin (koavf)TCM05:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep - five articles is perhaps just enough for a navigational template. It's only used on two of them, though... Robofish (talk) 01:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The topic covered by template directly includes only two articles (one of which is the main biography) and three "related articles". Looking at the content of the three other templates being used in Harry James Angus, I don't think that the presence of this fourth template facilitates navigation, since 4 of the 5 links present in this template are also present in the others. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IAST-hi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, orphaned template. —Justin (koavf)TCM03:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPRT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template, all transclusions have been replaced. —Justin (koavf)TCM02:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Boston Red Sox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, all transclusions replaced. The only links are in some talk, user spaces, and some references in a WikiProject. —Justin (koavf)TCM01:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.