Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 28

December 28

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox character. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Fighting game character with Template:Infobox character.
Template:Infobox video game character was merged per a previous discussion and following it, 4 other video game infoboxes were merged as well (Infobox Final Fantasy Character, Infobox Mortal Kombat Character, Infobox StarCraft character, Infobox Metal Gear character). The following parameters have corresponding ones in the target template: |birthplace= -> |origin=, |nationality= -> |nationality=, |weapon= -> |weapon=, |occupation= -> |occupation=. The two unique parameters - |weaponname= and |fightingstyle= could either use one of the custom fields, or be added to the template. Gonnym (talk) 23:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting style is literally the single most important classification for a fighting game character, more than anything else after "what series" (apparently I need to state things that are obvious), but are not important for most other characters (similar to same other, like nationality). Which is why we had the separate templates - serving their purpose for standardized infoboxes contain only the important things for each type of game character. But you guys just had to break it for us. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...and I mean the others too. But then you will only make it a chore to policy the infoboxes and remove things like "nationality" from most of non-fighting-game characters whenever it's added by someone who will now be able to add it, as it's usually unessential to trivial for all the other genres (not to mention traditional media). It's just complicating things for no reason, should had been left as it was. Now i's too late for that, so all should be "merged and added", to finish this process of complicating things for no reason. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 09:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are already at 2013 Austrian legislative election#Results. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and results are already at 1951 Austrian presidential election#Results. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of adding more separate nominations, I have added more similar Austrian election templates which are all unused. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and it actually looks like just a test page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox which provides absolutely no navigation. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Most of the shortname templates are unused and are unnecessary. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 17:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Stub. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This page is preserved for its contribution history as the template upon which the Lua module is based. It is also used in lieu of Module:Asbox for Wikis which do not have the Scribunto Extension installed. Not really possible to merge edit histories since the module was written in a cokpletely different language but the module is derived heavily from the MediaWiki and so it may be angood idea to keep the page for attribution and licensing? CodeHydro 00:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nevermind, I take it back. The original page history is on Template:Asbox (parent page) 00:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
  • delete, after 3 years, I would hope any testing has completed. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are already at 2005 Aruban general election#Results so this template is unnecessary. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with no foreseeable use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and mostly redundant to Template:Wikipedia RFC topics. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are already presented in a table at 2018 Armenian parliamentary election#Results. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are already presented in a table at 2017 Armenian parliamentary election#Results. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are already presented at 2008 Armenian presidential election#Results so this template is no longer required. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are presented in a better formatted table at 2011 Argentine general election#Presidential. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template; results are presented in a better formatted table at 2007 Argentine general election#President. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:05, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; results are presented in a better formatted table at 2003 Argentine general election#President. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates and are not top level competitions. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken navbox. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 5. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:07, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates and African Men's Handball Championship is not a top-level event. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 5. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file license. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and it doesn't work. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:29, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the relevant information is already at Livingstone-Macleod#2008 general election so this is not required. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates and the African Championships in Athletics is not a top-level event. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated template which refers to information from around eight to nine years ago which is no longer relevant today. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated template which refers to information from around ten years ago which is no longer relevant today. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template, fails requirement for three links. Bellezzasolo Discuss 13:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Team went bankrupt in 2018 and ceased to exist, see Lierse. Pelotastalk|contribs 09:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox consists of just three blue links and multiple red links. Transcluded in those three articles + one more. Doesn't serve much apart from a list of non notable Portuguese buildings. Ajf773 (talk) 02:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).