The following is a draft working towards a proposal for adoption as a Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal must not be taken to represent consensus, but is still in development and under discussion, and has not yet reached the process of gathering consensus for adoption. Thus references or links to this page should not describe it as policy, guideline, nor yet even as a proposal. |
A tomats is a measurement of text size that compares an article or other document against the length of The Old Man and the Sea. This book contains 26,531 words, so an article length of one tomats means that the article contains about 26,500 words. In principle, the length of an individual encyclopedia article should fall somewhere in between the length of a single dictionary definition and the length of a book.
Issue | Summary of arguments |
---|---|
Readability | Some believe tightening the guideline will increase readability. Attention span time. The average reading session is below the "don't bother to split"-limit.[1] It is not even 10% of the limits proposed in the earliest "readers may tire"-argument from 2004.[2] Content further down is less likely to be read, but readers can pick out sections they want to read.[3] |
Comprehensiveness | Some believe there is a trade-off between comprehensiveness and readability, others believe there is no trade-off. |
Accessibility | Concision is included in dyslexia friendly guidelines and fatiguing conditions. Accessible text should be structured well. This is more challenging with longer articles, especially on mobile, which only allows navigation on top-level headings. Search engines often direct the reader to the main article even when there is a subarticle on the exact topic. Some believe technical issues for readers with slower connections should mean limiting length. |
Quality | Some believe tightening the guideline will increase quality. |
Maintenance | Long articles have more content to maintain. On the other hand, when articles are split to resolve length issues, the maintenance load over multiple articles may become even larger. |
Explicit consensus | It is difficult to achieve explicit consensus on large bodies of text; there is a higher risk of single-authored text that may not reflect consensus. |
Guideline limits, existing and others (words) | Summary of evidence |
---|---|
8,000-10,000 | Length of journal articles.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] For attention span, a 2005 study includes this session estimate: 40 minutes x 238 words ~ 10,000 words. [4]. |
15,000 | Current guideline. |
No limit | Some editors believe removing the guideline would increase comprehensiveness. Removing limits reduces rules, Avoid instruction creep, WP:IAR and MOS:BLOAT. |
Year | Size | Longest promoted article found |
---|---|---|
2010 | 15400 | [5] Elvis |
2011 | 15200 | [6] Manhattan project |
2012 | 14400 | [7] Air Raids on Japan |
2013 | 14800 | [8] Spanish conquest of Petén |
2014 | 14000 | [9] Babe Ruth |
2015 | 15200 | [10] Maya civilization |
2016 | 14800 | Lenin |
2017 | 14700 | [11] Mandela |
2018 | 15900 | [12] Andrew Jackson, currently going through review |
2019 | 14800 | [13] Jomo Kenyatta |
2020 | 11700 | Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor |
2021 | 15400 | [14] James Longstreet |
2022 | 11000 | [15] Empire Strikes Back |
2023 | 12700 | [16] Henry II of England |
- ^ "European Journal of Futures Research". SpringerOpen. May 20, 2013. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "Information for Authors". academic.oup.com. Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "Manuscript Submission Guidelines: AERA Open: Sage Journals". Sage Journals. January 1, 2023. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal: Instructions for authors". Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal. November 17, 2019. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "Development and Change". OnlineLibrary.Wiley.com. Wiley. doi:10.1111/(issn)1467-7660. ISSN 0012-155X.
- ^ "Submissions". Global Labour Journal. February 3, 2022. Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "BGSU SSCI Journal Publishing Guide" (PDF). Retrieved November 26, 2023.
- ^ "Guide for authors". ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier. January 6, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2023.