Note: if the discussion that you are looking for is from this month, but is not on this page, it may still be at WP:UCFD.

January 21

edit

Category:User kv-0

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 09:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User kv-0 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

0-level category, which have been unanimously deleted per Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_by_0-level_language_knowledge. VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User singer-songwriters

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. –Black Falcon (Talk) 06:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User singer-songwriters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Improper naming convention, at minimum needs a rename to use "Wikipedian" instead of user, and to conform with the current naming convention of Category: Wikipedians by profession. Also wouldn't oppose deletion as I don't particularly think categorizing by profession is a good idea (WP:NOR issues come up in the discussion around the logic of keeping such categories). VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who want to be cremated

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 09:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians who want to be cremated (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not helpful to categorize desires per much precedent at Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_by_desire. VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lebanese-American Wikipedians

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Wizardman 06:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Lebanese-American Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ethnicity combination category, all have which been either deleted or double upmerged per Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_by_ethnicity_and_nationality. VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Insane Wikipedians

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Đэλш†£ - jc37 09:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Insane Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Such categories have been deemed not appropriate for Wikipedia per unanimous precedent at Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_by_medical_condition. Likely joke category, anyway. VegaDark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


January 12

edit

Category:Wikipedians who use a MacBook Air

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Proposing deletion of Category:Wikipedians who use a MacBook Air.
Nominator's rationale: This category does not assist in the construction of the encyclopedia and has little potential for promoting collaboration. - Stepheng3 (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 9

edit

Category:1980 user births

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as substantially similar re-creation of previously deleted content (see Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Archive/August 2007#Category:Wikipedians by year of birth). VegaDark (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deletion of Category:1980 user births.
Nominator's rationale: This category does not assist in the construction of the encyclopedia. It presents little or no opportunity for promoting collaboration. - Stepheng3 (talk) 08:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Totally unnecessary, as there's a template for ages of users. -- MISTER ALCOHOL T C 20:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 7

edit

Category:Wikipedians who use the iPhone

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as substantially similar to previously deleted content {see Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Archive/June 2007#Category:Wikipedians with iPhones. VegaDark (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deletion of Category:Wikipedians who use the iPhone.
Nominator's rationale: This category does not assist in the construction of the encyclopedia. It presents little or no opportunity for promoting collaboration. - Stepheng3 (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 3

edit

Category:Silly Wikipedians

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Icewedge (talk) 08:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deletion of Category:Silly Wikipedians.
Nominator's rationale: This is a pointless category which simply fills up cruft. Wikipedia is not a social networking site; such a "category" serves no purpose. Categories which are "jokes/nonsense" are explicitly prohibited by WP:Overcategorization/User categories. Tb (talk) 08:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 2

edit

Category:WikiProject Prison Break participants

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete--Aervanath (talk) 12:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:WikiProject Prison Break participants to Category:Prison Break Task Force participants
Nominator's rationale: per the taskforcification of the wikiproject NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 00:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from 2008 December 23 CfD. Thanks, — Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.