Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 September 9

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 8 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 9

edit

04:03:09, 9 September 2020 review of submission by Caby-Hooky

edit

Can you please tell me exactly which part of my sandbox page about Ulva Island Te Wharawhara Marine Reserve needs beter referencing & verification? Thank you! Caby-Hooky (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Caby-Hooky Caby-Hooky (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Caby-Hooky You have no independent reliable sources in the draft. You have some external links, but they are just that- they are not formatted as inline references for the article content. The subject does seem to be notable but it still needs to be written about in independent sources to merit a Wikipedia article. Please see WP:CITE for information on citing references. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:32:27, 9 September 2020 review of draft by Andysmith00000700

edit


Andysmith00000700 (talk) 10:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there - can you help me and tall me what I need to add/change to get this article published? Many thanks

In order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about Mike Dye in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no sources then we can’t have an article about them. Your draft has zero independent sources, see WP:REFB for help with correctly formatting them when you find them. Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:08:04, 9 September 2020 review of submission by Angelo2386

edit


I have legitimized religious practices that fall under the creationist story entailed within this article, not being "notable enough to include in Wikipedia" is an infringement of my rights to freedom of speech and religious freedoms.we are a small but really religious faction of ditheistic satanists. please re-review the article. Angelo2386 (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Angelo2386, in order for an article to be included in Wikipedia the topic must meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Specifically notability bust be established by significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Your rights to religious freedom and freedom of speech don't require Wikipedia to host content for you. Perhaps read over Wikipedia:Free_speech for more about that Pi (Talk to me!) 17:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:50:11, 9 September 2020 review of submission by Angelo2386

edit

I am the leader of a religious organization and the primary source for our religious beliefs there are no other sources , to mention but we are a legitimate religion. How do I make my article notable without any other sources ? Angelo2386 (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo2386 If your religious organization has not been written about by others unaffiliated with it in published, independent reliable sources with significant coverage, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. No amount of editing can change that. If you just want to tell the world about your organization, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Angelo2386 And while you're at familarisizing yourself with Wikipedia rules, here is another: WP:FREESPEECH. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:09, 9 September 2020 review of submission by Kwchapman

edit


Kwchapman (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I have revised this entry with what I believe to be is significant coverage that will now pass the notability requirements. Thanks very much for your consideration and review.

Kwchapman The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:43:03, 9 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Komalsharma664655

edit


Hi, my draft has been rejected many time due to tone, not being notable enough, lacking references. Each time I corrected the issues that were listed, other day new issue come up.

Can someone help me edit this one or can edit it on my behalf? LMK

Komalsharma664655 (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This would need reliable (no user-generated content) independent (no interviews or press releases) sources with significant coverage (not yust passing mentions). After a quick google search I determined that this topic is WP:TOOSOON. Please stop trying and focus on something else. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:54, 9 September 2020 review of submission by RPeevyhouse

edit

Hello, The app seems to have sufficient notability to meet WP:GNG. Apart from its popularity, coverage on highly reliable sources such as Forbes, LABJ, and Realty Next, I think make it eligible for an entry. I think we might be able to find more coverage about it if we looked harder. Should I go about and search more references that might offer new information? RPeevyhouse (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RPeevyhouse. Forbes magazine is a reliable source, but www.forbes.com/sites (by contributors rather than staff) are blogs. They are the exact opposite of highly reliable sources, and should not be cited as references. For a deeper understanding of what sources to use, see WP:RS, WP:RSN, and WP:RS/PS.
The draft has been rejected, which is intended to be final (as opposed to declined, which leaves open the possibility of improvement and resubmission). In the reviewer's judgement, the company is not notable. The cited sources are almost all about capital raising, a type of coverage that is explicitly excluded by the notability guidelines from those that can demonstrate notability. It would be highly unusual for a two-year-old company to be notable.
If I were you, I wouldn't sink any more time into the draft. Indeed, I would recommend against creating company-related articles entirely until you've built up considerable experience. Ninety-eight percent of Wikipedia's existing articles are rated less than "good" by the community, so there is enormous scope for improving the encyclopedia without creating new articles at all. If you're unsure where to start, see Wikipedia:Community portal for ways to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:21:41, 9 September 2020 review of submission by Kaundeepak

edit


Kaundeepak (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kaundeepak, your draft was rejected because the article doesn't contain any indication of notability. Perhaps see WP:ENTERTAINER for Wikipedia's policies on the notability requirements for entertainers Pi (Talk to me!) 17:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_September_9&oldid=985268181"