Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review/Biman Bangladesh Airlines

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Biman Bangladesh Airlines

The article looks good enough to become a Wikipedia FA collaboration. But, we could have it here first? Aditya Kabir 18:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two comments come to mind. One, the history section could probably be expanded, and a bit clearer indication of what the corporate structure of the firm has might be good as well. Secondly, I wonder about the purpose in saying that the company has contracts with 42 countries, but not mentioning them. It would seem to me that such a statement basically whets the reader's appetite and then leaves it unsatisfied. Maybe changing the phrasing to indicate that it has agreements with several countries (number unspecified) and then listing those in which it operates, or mentioning explicitly all the countries with which it does have agreements, might be the way to go. John Carter 14:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well referenced; however the destination list appears to be a bit clumsy. --:Raphaelmak: [talk] [contribs] 15:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. Could you elaborate on what needs changing. I thought it looked like all the other articles but I may be missing something obvious. Should the list for Bangladesh be under South Asia or should it remain at the top since that is the airlines home country? Thanks. → AA ^{(talk • contribs)} — 16:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very well referenced - one of the best I have seen. This is one of my big criticisms of airline articles and this is exemplary. I see nothing wrong with the destination list - it is of normal style and standard. The history section is a wee bit light and could be expanded (if someone had the info). Otherwise it sets a very high standard. More please Ardfern 17:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great article, but I am not sure it is yet ready to be a Wikipedia FA collaboration. There are a lot of references and important information in the article, but when reading through it, it seem to stand out, or be at FA status YET. Perhaps with some more time and edits, this article will become that much better, and really stand out. Greenboxed 17:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about making necessary corrections and taking a step to become A-class on this project? When that is done, I am hoping that enough people will be interested to collaborate to get it to an FA status, eventually. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 03:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted for Peer Review → AA ^(talk) — 16:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.