Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19/Reports, statistics and research
(Redirected from Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19/Coverage)
Note: The page Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 has dedicated sections on data reports, news reports, and academic reports.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19#Automated reports (inclusion of section below)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19#Press_coverage
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19#Academic research
Automated reports
edit- Those English articles, ordered by amount of audience traffic
- Audience traffic in 80+ various language Wikipedias for the single article on the outbreak, sorted by audience traffic 9M undercount, omits old title "2019–20 coronavirus outbreak"
- All pages related to COVID-19 across all wikis as of March 17th, 2020. User:Diego (WMF) is considering making this report update daily. Ping him if you have questions or feedback.
- Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/COVID-19 articles by quality log
- list of COVID-19 deaths a Listeria report from Wikidata
- User:HostBot/Reports: All three reports are potentially useful for people monitoring pageviews and edits to COVID-19 articles.
- COVID-19 article report : Updates daily at 14:00 UTC. This report contains the previous-days pageview totals for all articles with the COVID-19 topic template. It also provides predicted quality scores for each article (at its latest revision when the report was run). Total count of articles that transclude the template, and the cumulative daily pageviews for those articles are also listed.
- Top 1000 report: (updates daily at 15:00 UTC) It provides running traffic counts for the most popular Wikipedia articles within the past 7 days. Many of these articles may be related to COVID-19.
- Social media traffic report: (updates daily, at around 15-17:00 UTC) Like the Top 1000 report, many of these articles are related to COVID-19. Given the rise troubling rise in COVID-related conspiracy theories propagated through social media, this report may be especially helpful for monitoring attempts to disrupt Wikipedia or undermine it by inserting disinformation. Feedback welcome on Meta.