Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Article Classification/Archived requests 1

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics | Article Classification

2006

edit

December 2006

edit
  1. Why is Doctor Fate considered of low importance? Fate is at least a mid-level importance character. --Scottandrewhutchins 19:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    We've got to contextualise these character's importance to the medium, not within their own specific sphere. So in the DC COmics Fate is probably going to be of mid level importance, but that translates to low in relation to the whole of comics. We've got to bear in mind that a lot of characters are going to be of no importance, the bit parters and so on. Low is quite high in that sense. I mean, an article on the character is not going to be a must, but it's certainly not filler. I can see how a low was given, but I can also see where you are coming from suggesting a mid. Hiding Talk 20:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I hardly see how Carnage is of more importance than Doctor Fate. --Scottandrewhutchins 11:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I've already indicated I feel Carnage should be low. Hiding Talk 09:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Could someone look at Clea; it has no rating, on importance or quality. She's a very long-term supporting character, and I'd say the article is slightly better than a stub--Erikacornia 07:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Could someone take a look over Robin (Tim Drake) please. I've rated it B/Mid, but I'm not sure if it should be higher up the "Class" scale. I may be a bit biased in that I've just spent a fair chunk of time tweaking it. — J Greb 22:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks right to me. For me it would need more references, needs to be written with the present tense where it describes plot detail and needs better grounding our universe, as well as a better lead paragraph to be an A class. I might move it down to a start class article, but I'm not over-bothered. Hiding Talk 14:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Carnage (comics) - currently rated as B/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Iron Man's armor - currently rated as ???/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. List of S.H.I.E.L.D. members - currently rated as B/High --Mrph 23:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Chris has set them to Mid, Low and Low respectively, which I tend to agree with. I'd probably have gone Low on Carnage and offered a none on the other two, but Chris' way works too. Hiding Talk 21:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, yes, I meant to make mention of this. Why Low on Carnage? --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 13:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    "Why Low on Carnage?" Well, why not. Is Carnage that important a character to the world of comics as a whole? Convince me. Certainly a mid to high level in relation to Spiderman, but to the entirety of comics? Green Goblin I would rate as mid, is Carnage as important as Green Goblin? Hiding Talk 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    No opinion if Carnage should be mid or low, but high is certainly overrated (see my reasoning for the different categories on the talk page). I notice that already, some overenthusiasm in putting articles in Top and High is happening, but I'll wait to comment on most until I have a better view of what numbers these categories will have. Fram 14:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the wheat will eventually sort from the chaff as work gets underway. Hiding Talk 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    You would rate Green Goblin as low? I might rate him medium and then Carnage Low. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 14:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I said I would rate him as mid, and then Carnage as low. Which it appears we agree on. Which is a good thing. :) Hiding Talk 14:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, I think you convinced me about halfway through my writing the previous comment. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 15:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. The Noob - Currently rated as B/Low - I've done a lot of work on it from it's original stub, It would be nice to see how it measures up through peer review --Timmccloud 16:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Batman (comic book) Start-Class and High, User:Fram 20:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007

edit

January 2007

edit
  1. Crisis on Infinite Earths is currently rated as an 'A' class (and 'Top' importance) article - I'm not sure this class is correct, but I'm not confident enough to amend it myself. Can someone take a look? --Mrph 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No longer an issue Now revised to B/High. --Mrph 08:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Uncle Sam (comics) Re-rated as low, User:J Greb 18:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. WildC.A.T.s/X-Men rated as Start class & Low importance, User:Mrph 08:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

edit
  1. Could we get some consistency in the importance ratings for the various "Age" articles? Currently Silver Age of Comic Books and Bronze Age of Comic Books are rated as Top importance, Golden Age of Comic Books is rated as High, and Modern Age of Comic Books is rated as Mid. I would suggest they all be set as High. Thanks. -- Iron Ghost 19:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    All re-rated back to mid. Hiding Talk 14:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Thanos Re-rated B-Class, User:Circeus 01:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) rate as B-class and low importance, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Off*beat B class Hiding Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Anarky on hold at the minute, needs a few more tweaks fo GA/A-class. Steve block Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Rated as GA/A-class and low. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cast (talk • contribs) 21:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Anarky rate as B and low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. W.I.T.C.H. rate as start and low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. S.H.I.E.L.D. re-rate as low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Savage Dragon rate as B and Low, Hiding Talk 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Anarky on hold at the minute, needs a few more tweaks fo GA/A-class. Hiding Talk 21:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

edit
  1. Requesting an assessment for Anarky (comic book). - Cast 00:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Had been assessed as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

edit
  1. Funky Winkerbean - Rebochan 17:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Starbolt - --Nighthawkzx 16:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Rated as Start, Low Maple Leaf 16:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Xkcd. --Cadet hastings 00:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Rated as Start, High Maple Leaf 16:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Cybersix rate as B and low --Benten 20:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC) Maple Leaf 16:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Flame (comics) Konczewski 15:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Rated already as Start, Low[reply]
Or atleast was as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

edit
  1. CrossGen --72.49.117.89 16:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Rated as B Maple Leaf 16:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bionicle - I cannot fathom why this is "top" importance. Phil Sandifer 02:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Top importance was for Wikiproject Logo, comics rating was Low. Maple Leaf 16:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

edit
  1. Hellboy B and Low I'd say The Taste of Monkeys 23:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lex Luthor - B-Class, Top importance. It just got raised to GA.Johnnyfog 17:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. The Tick Recieved a start rating/mid importance. businessman332211 20:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

edit
  1. Lady Snowblood - Please rerate - Done Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Civil War: The Initiative - Rate as Mid importance. --Martin de la Iglesia 15:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. New Adventures Of Queen Victoria 68.34.242.83 02:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MwNNrules considers it doesn't need assessment. See [1]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. The_noob (webcomic)- Please rate, I've added the templates to the discussion page. Timmccloud 22:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BOZ notes this page was deleted as of December 3--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. The_noob (webcomic)- Please rate, I've added the templates to the discussion page. Timmccloud 22:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Had been assessed as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Wundarr the Aquarian - I've made a good deal of changes to the article(including references). ~ (Wakandas black panther 07:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)) - Rerated Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
businessman332211 had already assessed it as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Technet - I think this article is now set out very nicely, considering the complication of the material. Probably not very important though! -Kez 21:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC) - Done Maple Leaf 20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

edit
  1. Sin City - Rated as B and Low (left comments) - businessman332211 18:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently was posted in February 2007, though. See Revision as of 11:40, 29 January 2008--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. DC: The New Frontier - handy to know where the land lies before we target it for improvement. (Emperor 16:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]
See [2]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Dork Tower - Just wanted to get an assessment on this article and it's importance as it's currently unrated on both. --Craw-daddy | T | 18:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Request had been met as of January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Jolen (comics) Start Rating and low importance, done. businessman332211 18:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

edit
  1. Steve Roper and Mike Nomad I've greatly expanded content and sources, adding linked new articles on the authors. A new assessment will be appreciated: is it still "Start" class?SteveRoper 04:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MWNNrules saw it on January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. America (Judge Dredd story) - currently rated as a stub, it has just been expanded. Richard75 23:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See [3]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Steve Roper and Mike Nomad I've greatly expanded content and sources, adding linked new articles on the authors. A new assessment will be appreciated: is it still "Start" class?SteveRoper 04:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MwNNrules saw it on January 29--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Batman: Anarky - currently rated as stub. I've just expanded it.--Cast 02:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See [4]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008

edit

January 2008

edit
  1. George Liquor - No rating or grade. Currently under GA evaluation - Gak Blimby (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See [5]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Stan Lee Media has just been expanded to fall within the scope of the project. I added the template and gave it a quality assessment myself (not without reasoning) but have no idea what to give it for its importance rating.--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 06:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MwNNrules appears to consider it of Low importance for WikiPorject Comics. See [6]--Once in a Blue Moon (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Strangehaven has been expanded a great deal with information on publication history, characters and issues. --Mister Six (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See [7]
  1. The Sandman: The Doll's House I've tooken a personal interest in improving this and would like to see if I could get any support. It may be that those who do most, dream most. (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Okay, rated as start due to length and agree with the mid importance. Hiding T 17:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strangehaven has been expanded a great deal with information on publication history, characters and issues. --Mister Six (talk) 12:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Justice League of America (TV movie), recently added to project. Would like an assessment by one of the regulars if it's not much trouble :) Ryan4314 (talk) 06:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC) It's almost B-Class, but the production section needs a little more in it. Hiding T 09:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

edit
  1. Jeffrey Brown This article has not yet been rated and I would like it to have at least a quality rating. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Rated as start and mid importance, Brown is a relatively important creator in independent comics. The Journal interview may help flesh the article out. Hiding T 11:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Homosexuality in speculative fiction#Comics and Manga. Article has new section summary of other articles - is it missing much? Although it's a new rating for the whole article sought :-).Yobmod (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC). Passed GAN![reply]

2009

edit
  1. Awesome Comics. I've edited Rob Liefeld's Awesome Comics considerably, with a lot of information about both the company and it's output, as well as adding a near-complete bibliography. Noticed that there was this "rating" page, so I thought I'd mention it. ntnon (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC) B-Class. Hiding T 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. The Order of the Stick. Last time this was assessed was before I added sections on Critical Reaction and its use of parody as a form of commentary on roleplaying games, as well as a big pile of inline references, which I'm hoping increased the article's real-world context significantly. --Ig8887 (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC) C-Class, is tagged as needing additional sources so that needs fixing. Hiding T 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hungarian comics. I created the article not so long ago, and I'm planning on improving it somemore (e.g. adding images), but before that it would be useful to see, where this article is at the moment. Thanks! Zoli79 (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Rated C-Class by User:Emperor who feels more refs are needed.[reply]
  4. Scrooge McDuck. According to the template on its talk page, the article has not been checked. -- Wikipedical (talk) 01:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    It has been rated as B. As far as I know, to get a better rating (e.g. Good Article), it has to be nominated first. Zoli79 (talk) 10:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Suggest nominating article for GA process. Hiding T 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Checker Book Publishing Group. I haven't done the "Publishing History" yet, but otherwise, this should be a pretty-complete guide to this comics/newsstrip reprinting operation. ntnon (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC) C-Class, is tagged as needing additional sources so that needs fixing. Hiding T 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Spider-Man: One More Day This article is pretty stable with no major changes occurring. It looks at least B-Class 1. Referencing and citation: Y 2. Coverage and accuracy: Y 3. Structure: Y 4. Grammar: Y 5. Supporting materials: Y. Would like to request a peer review first. Also any thoughts on what needs to be done to obtain a better rating. Stextc (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC) B-Class, suggest nominating for GA-Class. Hiding T 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Cloak of Levitation — I've extended the article quite a bit(maybe five-fold?!) and added a picture. I know it's no longer a stub, so I'm going to go ahead and remove the stub template. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 04:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC) C-Class article, a few more refs and some detail on creative decisions needed for B. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. The Yellow Kid needs a new rating, I think. It would also helpful to know how far this article might be from G. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC) B-Class, very good work, very near GA. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stepford Cuckoos needs a rating for importance and quality. I went through and changed the in-universe style and attempted to reduce redundant and non-notable/speculative information.Luminum (talk) 22:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) C-Class, basically because of the cite needed in the lead. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Michel Vaillant -I think this article is ready to be assesed B-class. I have added references requested to comply with the first criterion for B-Class status. I would like a confirmation by some experienced users. --Pah777 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC) B-Class, expand the lead and submit for GA. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lightning Lass - I think this article is ready to be assessed again. I have added references, and cleaned up the 3 introductions that were original listed. I would like some ideas as to what else needs to be fixed if it is not ready for B Class. Sgetz (talk) 18:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Assessed as C-Class, needs more out of universe coverage and more refs. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Siege (comics) - I've filled in this article as much as I possibly could as well as added a picture. I think it's been improved dramatically so I'm requesting it be assessed.Xbriskox (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Very strong C-Class. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dennis the Menace (U.S.) - Made multiple edits/cleanup. Any suggestions appreciated. --Tehw1k1 (talk) 06:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC) Still B-Class. The nest stage would be to nominate it for GA Class, but I don't think this is ready for that. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wizards of Mickey - please rate this article as it has been just created --DuckD0nald (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Has been rated as a start by User:GentlemanGhost[reply]
  15. Anole (comics) - Requesting reassessment. Added multiple references and some real-world commentary about the character. AUburnTiger (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Rated as B-Class, left suggestions on how to take it further. Hiding T 12:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010

edit
  1. Batmobile - Requesting assessment. Much work has been done on it recently and I'm looking for ways it can be improved. A gx7 (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Joker (comics) - it was a B-class article that's been rated as C-class, and I'd like to know how we can improve it so it's better. The Joker's Woman[BlackPearl14•contribs!]
  3. Liam Sharp Just noticed the article is 'C' class, and low. There's a been a ton of work done on it, so just wondered if we could get the re-evaluated? I can verify it's 100% accurate! :) Best, Liam.
  4. LGBT themes in comics. I'm gradually working this up to GA, and have completely rewritten it and added 50 sources. An outside oppinion on whether it meets B class yet would be nice (and any comments on what is missing for GA?). Thanks!YobMod 09:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Typhoon (comics)-I've added numerous references to the article and I'm wondering if it would be deemed as better than start-class now. Thanks! OPMaster (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Anole (comics) - Rquesting reassessment. I followed all listed suggestions from the B-Class grading, standardizing all references to Wiki: Citation templates, expanding the lead, condensing sections into notable character development points, and adding further real world analysis and impact with third party sources. Hoping to work this up to a GA and eventually an FA. Thanks!Luminum (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. X-Men Origins: Wolverine - Not fully-comics, I know. Rated C-Class, plenty of referenced content. Worthy of a B, and some input on what needs improvement would be nice. igordebraga ≠ 02:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Star Sapphire (comics) - It's been rated at C class, but I've made a number of significant changes to it. I've corrected grammar, added citations, and done a lot of general clean up. I tried to get a peer review, but no one has responded. So I figured I'd just jump to this. Hooliganb (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. The Doomsday Scenario - It's been rated Start class, but I suggest it's clearly better than that. It meets the B class checklist criteria, so I think it ought to be B or at least C class, looking at the table above. I can't re-rate it myself because I'm biased, since I wrote most of it. Richard75 (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Nightwing - I don't think this is start class anymore. Seeking C-class. 119.11.0.224 (talk) 04:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Erfworld - I've streamlined this long and tangled page into something more like an article. Seeking C-class instead of start class. 119.11.0.224 (User:npatchett)
  12. Noel Van Horn - Currently stub-class. Was originally only a few sentences, I expanded and sourced the article. --Grandy02 (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Flemming Andersen - Same as Noel Van Horn. --Grandy02 (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Eega Beeva - I rearranged, expanded and sourced the article (one citation is still needed, though). Tone should also be appropriate now. --Grandy02 (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mechanismo - I have added references, so it now meets all criteria in the B-Class checklist. Richard75 (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Chief Judge Fargo - added refs, hoping for B-Class. Richard75 (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Constantine (film): Previously rated as start class. I've been working immensely to improve the quality of this article. I request for a review as to the current class on the quality scale. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 19:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Lucky Luke - Major change in layout and section additions Kasaalan (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Democracy (Judge Dredd storyline) - This has been rated as a Good Article; trying to get up to A-Class if possible. Peer review request here. Richard75 (talk) 18:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gladiator - I think this should certainly now be deserving of B-class status, at the very least. Homoaffectional (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Updated. Joined the team; reassessed myself. Consider this matter closed. Homoaffectional (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stumptown (comics) - Requesting assessment Chromatikoma (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Acme Novelty Library - Would love to see this move from Start class. Jnthn0898 (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Bizenghast - Last rated as C-class, but a lot of work (and sources) has been put in since then. Kaguya-chan (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Barry_Windsor-Smith I'd appreciate a critique of a number of pages I've done recently, for potential upgrading (of course) and good pointers for future contributions. Hoping to upgrade a significant number of existing pages in 2010, and add more. This would help immensely. Thanks - note: the next entries also link Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Dominic_Fortune ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Rex_the_Wonder_Dog ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ace_Comics ... see above Archiveangel (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Alan_Class_Comics_(publishers) new page - as complete as I can get it! Archiveangel (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mystery_in_Space complete re-write, hopefully to reflect classic status better Archiveangel (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. I Luv Halloween Last rated start-class, but a lot of work has put in since. Kaguya-chan (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Thor (film) ... page is currently unassessed. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Viper Comics ... page is currently assessed as advertisement. I've edited the content to more neutral language and added a couple of references. I'm new at this, so let me know what additional edits would be appropriate. --Mettam (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jason Todd Last rated C-Class but it's now been heavily rewritten and developed. [Mike]
  34. Glory Grant Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Women in Refrigerators I'm new to the peer review process - I'd like to work to make an A article but am confused about the peer review process. At the least, I went through the last iteration and did a clean up and am wondering if it at least rates a B now. Fcr (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Gabriel Vargas - Could someone run the WP Comics B Class checklist for assessment and improvement I helped to expand Gabriel Vargas which appeared today as a DYK. Thanks in advance. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Juan José Carbó. It is also DYK nominated. --moreno oso (talk) 18:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe - I was able to get it rated B-class at WP:VG and want to see if the quality also stands in this Wikiproject. Subzerosmokerain (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story) Richard75 (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lat: Malaysian cartoonist who received a title equivalent to a knighthood for his work. Massive rewrite, article is also undergoing a peer review here (comments are welcome). The current article approaches A-class in my view and I tried giving it a straight B, but the Comics template wants a checklisted approach, so here it is listed. Jappalang (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. The Kampung Boy: Lat's most well-known work. I have expanded and rewritten with reliable sources. Not yet sent to a peer review, but like Lat's article, I believe it is substantially better than before. Jappalang (talk) 15:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hawkeye (comics): Has not been fully assessed against Class B. Davelecave (talk) 17:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mockingbird (Marvel Comics): Added citations missing for Class B status. Davelecave (talk) 18:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011

edit
  1. Tintin in the Land of the Soviets, as of 04 January 2011.
  2. Tintin in the Congo, as of 09 January 2011.
  3. Nocturne (comics)
  4. Constantine (film) - Requesting re-assessment of this article currently rated as C-Class. Any tips on raising it's status further would be appreciated. Thanks. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 17:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hellblazer- Really just want to see if what I've done is an improvement or a ruination, and what needs done further to get it even further. Cheers Bennydigital (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Weathercraft by Jim Woodring (looking to get it bumped up at least to a B-rating) Acidtoyman (talk) 04:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Paying For It by Chester Brown Acidtoyman (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Requesting re-assessment (currently a C; now much improved) CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 12:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alexander George Gurney as of 9 July 2011 149.171.155.146 (talk) 12:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bluey and Curley as of 9 July 2011 149.171.155.146 (talk) 12:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Norman Hetherington as of 16 July 2011 149.171.155.146 (talk) 04:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Small Saves as of 22 Oct 2011 Requesting reassessment Dkendr (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012

edit
  1. Denis Gifford Requesting re-assessment of article currently ranked as C-class in Wikiproject comics, changed quite a lot plus comigraphy/ comic writings list page. talk 22:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Judge Dredd This article has changed quite a bit since it was rated C-class. Hoping for a B. Richard75 (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Red Hood and the Outlaws This article was created from parts of Jason Todd and Starfire, I'm hoping for some guidelines on how to improve it. Charliefr99 (talk) 02:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Louis Riel (comics) : the article has been thoroughly rewritten and expanded, lots of sources. Also, it is a bestseller and award-winner, so I think its importance should be reevaluated as well. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 06:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    passed   FA CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 06:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Canadian comics Has undergone peer review, but not reassessment, since being rewritten from scratch and greatly expanded (originally 14kb, now 72kb), and thoroughly sourced. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 11:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Has been assessed as GA. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 00:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Markosia Still not of great quality, but there has been an info box added and a logo. Currently ranked as a stub Mwheatley1990 (talk) 16:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Billy DeBeck Fully rewritten, reorganized, greatly expanded (from about 10kb to 20kb. I think it's reasonably complete. I'm not aware of any important parts missing), fully reffed. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 01:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    assessed as   GA CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 06:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. The Avengers (2012 film) - The highest grossing superhero film of all time should not be "bottom importance".Richiekim (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. X-Men: First Class Requesting a B-class assessment from a member due to a GA nomination. Jhenderson 777 17:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. John Wagner - previously assessed as "start" class and failed "B" class for not enough inline cites. I've given it a thorough rewrite with plenty of refs. --Nicknack009 (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Wonder Woman - Requesting assessment for "Good Article" rating. Article is currently rated B class.
  12. Near Death (comics)- I think I've taken this past "start" Argento Surfer (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mind MGMT - Argento Surfer (talk) 20:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2014-2016

edit
  1. Streamline (comics) Requesting a C-class Bugsysiegel71 (talk) 01:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Todd McFarlane's Spawn: The Video Game. Currently stub. Was completely rewritten. Bergakungen91 (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blackhawk (DC Comics) Requesting a reassessment after a comprehensive ground-up rewrite (23kb to 56kb). Hoping for at least a B, if not higher. DoctorSivana (talk) 22:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film): Requesting a A-Class assessment. Jhenderson 777 20:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Captain Carrot and His Amazing Zoo Crew! – I moved it from Start-class to C-class, but someone with expertise in Comics assessment should do the B-class review.  Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  09:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Symkaria - was a stub, information has been added. Requesting start status. Article up for deletion.
  7. Transia - was a stub, information has been added. Requesting start status. Article up for deletion.
  8. Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. – Article appears to have more than enough references and covers it topic with enough accuracy to be assessed for grade B.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Norman Osborn - Requesting reassessment for a C-list article to be upgraded to B-list. I believe we've addressed the previously outstanding criterion of citations. Plus, it's been rewritten to address grammatical errors and structural problems. --Downthewikiwormhole (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Marvel vs. Capcom 2: New Age of Heroes - Requesting reassessment following article overhaul. Wani (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Titania (Marvel Comics) is currently at Start-Class. I've gone through it for a few days and would like a reassessment (hoping for at least a B!) -SHODAN (talk) 19:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. DC Comics Graphic Novel Collection - Requesting an initial assessment so that the necessary improvements can be made.

2017-2018

edit
  1. Three Thieves (graphic novel series) - Requesting assessment because it hasn't been assessed, and the article is halfway through completion. Also, is no longer a stub by far. L3X1 Complaints Desk 17:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I see this has now received an assessment of Stub, and I agree. Since all sources are primary sources (apart from one Goodreads link, and Goodreads is not a reliable source), this hasn't even met a basic requirement of an article to demonstrate notability. Until that's met I think it must be the lowest rating. HenryCrun15 (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ODY-C - It used to be three sentences long. Now it is not. --Mooeena (talk) 03:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dennis Hopeless - Was told to add more biographical details to get a higher grade, so I added a personal section with information about his wife and children. Have kept the page updated with current work. OffensiveName (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Serbian comics - rewritten from scratch in 2016, polished recently.WimbledonGreen (talk) 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have bumped this up to C-class as it is extensive, but no further as it lacks a lot of citations. For example, where is the source for the statement "Comics started developing in Serbia in the late 19th century, mostly in humor and children’s magazines"? HenryCrun15 (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Article_Classification/Archived_requests_1&oldid=1088278086"