Previous nominations here and here.

Renominating article for Kyriakos; no opinion on its quality. Kirill Lokshin 13:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Interesting facts and well sourced. Periklis* 05:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • minor oppose Your getting there Kyriakos, ever return it is a better article. Sadly, I must once again oppose its A-status. Akin to my previous comments, it qould require a batter delivery, its sentences often repeat elements seen but a few senstences before. On many occassions synonyms would be most welcomed, as would some less conversationnal writting style. I`ve done some minor polishing in the openning paragraphs, yet am unwilling to proceed with the main body should I sand off important particles of information in my zeal. Godspeed.--Dryzen 13:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A lot of work has gone into improving the article - it needed it - but quite a bit more work is still required. There are a lot of errors still remaining: eg the very last sentence. Also, try to avoid the word 'then' so often eg: Philip did this, then he did that, then he did another thing. There are a lot of typos. 'A' for effort but not yet for quality. Raymond Palmer 15:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]