Wikipedia:WikiProject Zimbabwe/Peer review
Zimbabwe-related tasks
Here are some Zimbabwe related tasks you can do: |
Zimbabwe articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 13 | |
FL | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
A | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 3 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 30 | ||
B | 29 | 12 | 14 | 35 | 20 | 110 | |
C | 42 | 30 | 56 | 125 | 79 | 332 | |
Start | 99 | 139 | 205 | 585 | 319 | 1,347 | |
Stub | 37 | 192 | 318 | 1,076 | 514 | 2,137 | |
List | 17 | 14 | 11 | 51 | 2 | 52 | 147 |
Category | 2,905 | 2,905 | |||||
Disambig | 9 | 9 | |||||
File | 80 | 80 | |||||
Project | 33 | 33 | |||||
Redirect | 10 | 14 | 42 | 31 | 177 | 274 | |
Template | 210 | 210 | |||||
Other | 16 | 16 | |||||
Assessed | 238 | 412 | 660 | 1,919 | 3,432 | 985 | 7,646 |
Unassessed | 1 | 75 | 76 | ||||
Total | 238 | 412 | 660 | 1,920 | 3,432 | 1,060 | 7,722 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 21,276 | Ω = 5.36 |
The peer review department of the Zimbabwe WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Zimbabwe WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
Instructions
editWikiProject peer reviews
A Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject. To see active peer reviews on Wikipedia, click here. To learn how to request a peer review, click here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list.
To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.