Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index

WP Disaster management doesn't update

Wikipedia:WikiProject Disaster management assessment table does not automatically update, and I could not get the manual update to work, either. The manual update will appear to run, but the assessment table and associated WP1 pages will not change. To be clear, I am certain that assessments and importance with this WP tag have been entered, but those changes are not reflected in the system. Thank you in advance. Baltarstar (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

FOR INFO: See next thread which addresses the concerns stated above in fuller detail. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The tables are not being updated

It's not just WikiProject Disaster management (per prev thread) – none of the tables have updated since 00:00, 5 August 2024 UTC. And, yes, it was exactly 00:00, when a custom table updated. The logs are updating, just not the tables. The last table update previous to that custom table was 05:03, 4 August 2024 User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles, and prev to that 01:56, 4 August 2024 User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/United States. Nurg (talk) 23:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

The logs aren't being properly updated either. The bot is pruning old dates without updating to add new dates worth of articles. Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Computing articles by quality log, for example, has been updated by the bot twice since August 4, but only to remove the logs for July 28 and July 29. At the rate its going, the page will soon be blank. It's doing this with every quality log page, actually—Special:Contributions/WP 1.0 bot is currently a sea of red. DigitalIceAge (talk) 00:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

I've noticed this log issue as well. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 06:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

I just ran this bot manually for a project, and it doesn't produce new logs or regenerate the table. Does anyone know what is going on? Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 14:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

@Audiodude: and @Walkerma: - can this issue be investigated please. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

I just did some poking around, and it appears that maybe this is affected by a replag on enwiki caused by the work described in this Phabricator ticket. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 14:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Well the replag is gone (new articles I've been creating show up in XTools now) but the bot keeps eating up logs without adding more entries. What's the story here? DigitalIceAge (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm still seeing a replag over 138 hours. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 04:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry I can't solve this - I'm not the tech person - but I'll try to raise Audiodude or someone else who can figure things out. Usually they follow this page and respond quickly, so they may be travelling. Walkerma (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Looking into this now, hang tight. audiodude (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

As theorized in this thread, this is indeed caused by the replag, which is now 175 hours. This means the WP 1.0 Bot hasn't received any new information since August 3, and so hasn't produced any "new" tables. I can confirm that the bot is running without errors, and is "trying" to update the tables, but since none of the information has changed, the Mediawiki software rejects/ignores those updateds.

As for the *_by_quality_log pages, the bot always deletes information older than 7 days. Since there is currently no new information, it appears that the bot is simply "blanking out" the page, but those entries were scheduled for removal anyways. The problem is that there are no new updates for the intervening days.

When the replica databases catch up, the *_by_quality_log pages will get a single update that contains all of the information for the missed days. This will all be attributed to whatever day it catches up, so on August 11 or whatever when it's fixed, you will get a log page that says "August 11: A, B, C, D" where all of those entries are the backlog since August 3.

Hope this helps. audiodude (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject LGBT moved to WP:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies and related assessment categories

Hi,

The categories for the related Wikiproject have moved from Category:LGBT articles by quality to Category:LGBTQ+ studies articles by quality. And for the person sub area from Category:LGBT studies - person articles by quality to Category:LGBTQ+ studies - person articles by quality.

Is there anything that will need to be done for the bot to pick up the change of the Project titles from "LGBT" to "LGBTQ+ studies"?

I saw there was the page at User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/LGBTQ+ studies and User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/LGBTQ+ studies - person which I already moved to match the new name, but just want to make sure this will actually be picked up by the bot when it does its nightly run? Raladic (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Self-reply. Looks like my move of the relevant pages got everything working :) The bot has continued to update the pages based on the updated category titles :) Raladic (talk) 01:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Content assessment bot query for WP:RNLI

I've just created the following categories (as well as sub-cats) for Wikipedia:WikiProject Water sports/RNLI task force:

• Category:RNLI articles by quality
• Category:RNLI articles by importance

I followed the instructions for setting up the bot but I'm unsure how to link the categories with the task force; only the parent WikiProject (Water sports) appears when I try to manually run the bot. Here's a link to an example article that has one of the task force's talk page templates: Talk:Fowey Lifeboat Station.

Any help would be much appreciated! Cheers, Aluxosm (talk) 01:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

@Aluxosm: Can you give an example of another task force that is already set up for something similar to what you require here? Maybe we can compare them, see how they differ. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

@Redrose64: The Cheeses task force of the Food and Drink WikiProject uses this feature. I've just compared the templates and read through the task force docs again and am now thinking it might have something to do with the TF_n_ASSESSMENT_CAT parameter:

• Template:WikiProject Food and drink
• Template:WikiProject Water sports

Thanks for the eyes on this, Aluxosm (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Ooh, I think you actually solved this 12 years ago, Redrose64!

• User talk:Redrose64/requests#Statistics table for Wikipedia:WikiProject St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

Might need to just add the |TF_n_QUALITY=, |tf n importance=, and |TF_n_ASSESSMENT_CAT= parameters to the talk page template.

These docs describe the usage of each parameter. Aluxosm (talk) 13:49, 12 October 2024 (UTC)