Wikipedia talk:Don't-give-a-fuckism
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:FUCK)
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 177.105.90.85 in topic I think the original slur should be included in the quote
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Don't-give-a-fuckism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about Don't-give-a-fuckism at the Reference desk. |
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don't-give-a-fuckism page. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
 | This project page was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
yes
editthis is awesome. 187.39.132.210 (talk) 21:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I think the original slur should be included in the quote
editIt's linked right above, and anyone with ctrl+f can easily find it. I don't really see a purpose to having it censored, but I don't know what was agreed on previously and don't want to get in trouble for re-adding it. What do you guys think? DarmaniLink (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- It just seems like censorship due to offensive language, it is different because its an essay but WP usually has a no-censorship policy DarmaniLink (talk) 08:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know why the censorship, it's just don't take it seriously, it's not difficult, in my opinion, it was truly unfair because it is humorous material, but anyway 177.105.90.85 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Seems fair. I'd say go for it. Telpies (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Special Note: I am utterly aware that someone can get offended, but understand my side, if you're feels uncomfortable, just looks for somewhat that is in accordance with your precepts and your POV.
- Overall, this material, i.e, DGAFkism essay, is not meant to offend any kind of person, and it shouldn't be taken seriously, even because it is humorous content, exclusively humorous, ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.105.90.85 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Proposal to better fit humor of essay
editchange to
I feel like this would better fit the humor of the essay, how about you? jayhawker6 (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I like it DarmaniLink (talk) 02:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)