Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways/Peer review

Proposal to mark historical

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Mark as historical. Dough4872 06:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC) I propose that this process is marked historical. Today, a peer review was closed after a year and a half with no comments. This is the definition of a dead process. The function of this peer review is redundant, to some degree, to both WP:PR and WP:HWY/ACR (the latter of which we have had problems keeping staffed even without reviewers splitting their time between here and there). I am not really sure of a situation in which HWY/PR is more suited to the task than either of the mentioned processes; therefore, marking it historical makes the most sense. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 09:04, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

• Support per the above. Imzadi 1979 → 09:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
• Support. –Fredddie™ 12:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
• Support - Not used anymore. People can use WP:PR and WP:HWY/ACR to get feedback on articles. Dough4872 19:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
• Support Today I discovered that this page was not on my watchlist since sometime in 2010. --Rschen7754 19:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Hwypeerreview}}

Template:Hwypeerreview (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)