Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Hungary page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 91 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Hungarian Spectrum
editHi, there is an ongoing debate about the Hungarian Spectrum. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hungarian_Spectrum
If You are interested, please weigh in!
Bias in Puskás Akadémia FC article
editIn the Puskás Akadémia FC article there is a section entitled "Trivia" that leans on political propaganda and makes claims without citing sources. It would behoove us to remove this section for the sake of neutrality, as the author is clearly displaying bias with his comments.
Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Hungary is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 07:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Question, help/collaborator needed
editHello everyone,
I'm Ábel Elekes, a Hungarian postdoc at BarabásiLab,, the research group led by Albert-László Barabási, at Northeastern University in Boston.
Our team is currently studying how scientists are represented in various information sources like Wikipedia and AI systems, focusing on biases related to gender and region.
To show how we can overcome these representation biases, we've designed an intervention study, in which we're adding 100 notable scientists to different information sources, including Wikipedia. These are highly prestigious scientists who, surprisingly, don't currently have Wikipedia pages, but should have based on their significant contributions to their fields.
We're using a web-search based AI to write the articles, but we're having trouble getting them approved by Wikipedia editors, although we feel like they are of high quality.
We're new to Wikipedia editing and could use some help. If anyone here is interested in collaborating on this project, we'd really appreciate your assistance.
Thank you! Ábel Elekesabel (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Siege of Szigetvár
editSiege of Szigetvár has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Franz Joseph I of Austria#Requested move 29 August 2024
editThere is a requested move discussion at Talk:Franz Joseph I of Austria#Requested move 29 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 00:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)