Wikipedia talk:Non-discrimination policy
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 6 July 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
The policy applies only to WMF staff and contractors, and regulates how they interact with each other and with users. It applies to all projects only in the sense that WMF staff and contractors can interact with each other and users on any project. Roger Davies talk 06:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
@GeoffBrigham (WMF), Mpaulson (WMF), and Roger Davies:
I'm rather surprised by this interpretation of the policy. What does the word "user" mean in the following?
"The Wikimedia Foundation prohibits discrimination against current or prospective users and employees on the basis of race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected characteristics."
I understand that it is easier for the Foundation to deal directly with employees, so the word "especially" applying to employees is understood, but doesn't it also mean that it also applies to users where applicable? "The Wikimedia Foundation commits to the principle of equal opportunity, especially in all aspects of employee relations, including employment, salary administration, employee development, promotion, and transfer."
I don't think that the community views this policy as applying only to employees. I'd be surprised if the Board viewed it that way. If the WMF doesn't have a non discrimination policy that applies to users, I think we need to get one! Smallbones(smalltalk) 03:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Smallbones: My comment above was based on this clarification by WMF lawyer, Luis Villa and a subsequent email exchange with him. Roger Davies talk 12:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps we could simplify this?
The Wikimedia Foundation prohibits it's staff and contractors from breaking the law.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC).
What about former editors and employees?
editBy the current wording, "current and prospective," it's free game to be as racist as I want towards people who have quit, been fired, or otherwise de-affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects. I call for a wording change. -Mr. Man (talk) 20:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- After further consideration, I probably don't have that authority. I am bringing it to the attention of the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.-Mr. Man (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Edit request to complete MfD nomination
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Wikipedia:Non-discrimination policy has been listed at Miscellany for deletion (nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
{{mfd|help=off}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Done — xaosflux Talk 14:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
