Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Mahmoud Ahmadinejad/Archive 4
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Daniel in topic Issues status
|
This is an archive of past discussions for the mediation of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Please do not edit the contents of this page. This mediation has been closed — if you wish to start a new discussion, please do so on the article talk page. |
 Archives |
|---|
Possible new issue: Sources
editNow that the lead is all sorted, I think we can move onto the "Usage of some sources by one of the editors which some other editors believe that do not verify the text" issue. This was added by Pejman47 when mediation started.
What I'd like to know is if there's still a dispute about this issue (a lot of things have changed since then), and whether this issue still needs to be pursued. I welcome all input, although especially Pejman's, for these questions. If it comes back that we need to discuss it, I will ask for specific details then. For now, I am merely trying to find out whether it's still an issue or not.
Cheers, Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Parties? Daniel 05:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I thought this was addressed to Pejman, but the resolution of the paragraph addresses most of my major concerns with the article.. --Nosfartu (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think most of it was removed when a couple of weeks ago the article was unlocked. Today and Tomorrow, I will look on the article and will delete all the stuff with poor sources or even the ones that doesn't verify the texts. --Pejman47 (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- OK, in that case all issues have been addressed, so I am closing this case as successful. Thanks to all parties for their good-faithed participation, and I wish all of you well in your editing. Cheers, Daniel 00:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think most of it was removed when a couple of weeks ago the article was unlocked. Today and Tomorrow, I will look on the article and will delete all the stuff with poor sources or even the ones that doesn't verify the texts. --Pejman47 (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- I thought this was addressed to Pejman, but the resolution of the paragraph addresses most of my major concerns with the article.. --Nosfartu (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Issues status
edit- The issues that belong in the lead as well as the neutral wording of the section.
Done (with latest compromise). Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Inclusion of the Iranian government response to the "wipe off the map" speech in the lead.
- Done (with latest compromise). Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Usage of some sources by one of the editors which some other editors believe that do not verify the text.
{{cross|18}} Not done as of November 22. Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)- Done (will be addressed via normal editing) as of November 27. Daniel 00:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- some violations of WP:WTA
{{cross|18}} Not done as of November 22. Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)- Done (will be addressed via normal editing) as of November 27. Daniel 00:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.