Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Transport

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:TRANSPORT)

Drone redirects

edit

FYI, drone redirects are being discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24 -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 02:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Southend Corporation Transport

edit

I have started a question about merging Trolleybuses in Southend-on-Sea and Southend-on-Sea Corporation Tramways on their talk pages, and renaming as Southend Corporation Transport. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have now merged the pages together and added a motorbus section. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 19:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal Semi-metro into Light rail and/or Premetro

edit

Merge proposal: Semi-metro into the Light rail and / or Premetro

A proposal has made to merge the Semi-metro article into the Light rail article. An alternative suggestion emerged to merge "Semi-metro" with Premetro instead, as some participants believe this might be a better fit given their specific similarities. This proposal has received some support as a compromise to address the concerns. Lea 4545 (talk) 09:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Crossing the inner German border during the Cold War#Requested move 30 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense ‥  03:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Blue Origin landing platform" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Blue Origin landing platform has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § Blue Origin landing platform until a consensus is reached. 64.229.88.34 (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Port Blair#Requested move 13 September 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Port Blair#Requested move 13 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pedestrian crossings in Portland, Oregon

edit

Inviting transport enthusiasts to help improve Pedestrian crossings in Portland, Oregon, if interested. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why does this article even exist? Are pedestrian crossings in Portland remarkedly different to crosswalks in any other city in the world? Are we now expected to create a corresponding article for every other city in the world?  Stepho  talk  23:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Flag of convenience

edit

Flag of convenience has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Sibu

edit

Sibu has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Bulk carrier

edit

Bulk carrier has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merger

edit

I think Tidewater Transportation District Commission should be merged literally and figuratively into Hampton Roads Transit, since it already has happened in real life. One unsourced stub and another poorly updated start article can make a better Class C article. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Greyhound Lines

edit

Greyhound Lines has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply