Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:UKRAIL)
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Difficultly north in topic 2324 station usage

Passengers using Sheffield Victoria in 1981

edit

Please see Talk:Sheffield Victoria railway station#Used in 1981. Can a reliable source be found? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Now in the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

RDT assistance required

edit

I've created {{2024 Talerddig collision RDT}} for use in the 2024 Talerddig collision article. The top of the diagram needs tweaking so that the diagram displays in a similar way that {{2021 Salisbury rail crash RDT}} displays in the 2021 Salisbury rail crash article. If any editor is able to assist, it would be appreciated. Mjroots (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Mjroots I've added the inline parameter, which is what I think you were looking for. Mackensen (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Mackensen, diagram is displaying correctly now. Mjroots (talk) 11:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Interesting book about South Wales Metro

edit

@Barrymarkd may not be an experienced Wikipedia editor, but it is clear that he knows a lot about public transportation systems. He has tried a couple of times to reference his own self-published book How To Build A Metro. Yes I know it rings WP:COI and WP:SPS alarm bells, but go take a look, it's very interesting and well written. It is within the WP:SPS guideance to allow referencing to self published works by knowledgeable authors and in this case I think it's something that we could use. Thoughts? 10mmsocket (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

British Rail Class 555

edit

There is a move discussion ongoing at British Rail Class 555 to move the article to Tyne and Wear Metro Class 555 which I would appreciate input in, as it was originally moved without discussion. Thanks. Danners430 (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Greater Anglia franchise railway stations has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Greater Anglia franchise railway stations has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.. JuniperChill (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Northern franchise railway stations is also part of that discussion JuniperChill (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seven Sisters station

edit

Some people may recall Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 56#Engineering diversions. We now have a different username, Golden409bus (talk · contribs), insisting on adding unsourced train service content to the same article, Seven Sisters station. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers#Requested move 12 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 12:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Station page linking

edit

Someone please tell me what the actual difference is between Purley and a plain Purley or Purley railway station in full. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 21:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Between the first two, none. Which is used is just the personal preference of the editor writing that bit of content.
Between either of the first two and the latter one, it's just whichever works best in the context it's being used. Thryduulf (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
My question then, if {{stnlink}} does basically nothing, why have it, if we can just use normal [[ ]] wikiliks? Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 22:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
It exists because some editors prefer it as it is easier to type. Personally I just use plain wikilinks, but my preference is no more or less valid than any other editor's. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 22:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Mattdaviesfsic: {{stnlink|Purley}} is shorter to type than [[Purley railway station|Purley]], plus you only need to write Purley once. But Template:Stnlnk has distinct advantages when it comes to disambiguation: some stations have the parenthetical disambiguator after the words "railway station". e.g. Gillingham railway station (Dorset) and Gillingham railway station (Kent); some have it before, e.g. London Road (Brighton) railway station and London Road (Guildford) railway station. But you don't need to know which format is used - the syntax is the same:
Of course, if you want the words "railway station" to be displayed, using the normal wikilink is the way to go. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Aha, thx Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 23:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you prefer writing links out in full, you can use {{subst:stnlnk}}. For example {{subst:stnlnk|Birmingham New Street}} expands to [[Birmingham New Street|Birmingham New Street railway station]]. Voice of Clam (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

EWR 2024-2025 consultation

edit

The non-statutory consultation on updated proposals for East West Rail, running from Nov 2024 to Jan 2025 has been released today. See here. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 11:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

2324 station usage

edit

The new station usage figures from the ORR will be released on Thursday 21st November. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 14:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply