Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-12-12/Opinion

← Back to Opinion

Discuss this story

Indeed, that was an interesting RfA, with strongly held opinions covering both ends of the spectrum as to the value of it. This post is a good reflection on the value of feedback. I've been an admin for nearly eight years now and if anyone has feedback for me (good or bad), I'd certainly be interested to hear it. Schwede66 22:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

You said: "I find it hard to conceive of a scenario that an administrator's petition meets its requirement for RRfA, and that administrator goes on to be reconfirmed." I don't know about that one ... had I not accidentally dropped accelerant on my recall petition (or in a scenario in which I hadn't encountered the editor whose block brought it all to a head), maybe it might have limped to 25 signatures on the 30th day and I would've been in a much better position regarding an RRFA. As for what actually happened, if my nominators hadn't had faith in me, I would've just resigned. Graham87 (talk) 07:58, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

And yes, I basically rationalised the 2022 ANI against me, in short, because of the unusual situation in the main discussion and the relative inexperience of the user who brought up the 2020 block mentioned there. More specific discussion about that should probably go somewhere else. Graham87 (talk) 08:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)