Wikipedia

War crimes in World War I

(Redirected from World War I crimes)

During World War I (1914–1918), belligerents from both the Allied Powers and Central Powers violated international criminal law, committing numerous war crimes. This includes the use of indiscriminate violence and massacres against civilians, torture, sexual violence, forced deportation and population transfer, death marches, the use of chemical weapons and the intentional targeting of Red Cross personnel and medical facilities.

Namur City Hall, destroyed by the German invasion of Belgium, 1914

The governments of all major combatants had previously signed the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, which these atrocities intentionally violated. Even so, both the decisions to commit, and to refuse to court-martial, the perpetrators of World War I crimes was motivated by what American Civil War historian Thomas Lowry has termed "the European tradition … that to victors belong the spoils - the losers could expect pillage and plunder",[1] and that enemy civilians are "grist for the mills of more hardheaded conquerors such as Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, and Ivan the Terrible."[2]

Austro-Hungarian war crimes

edit

Austro-Hungarian invasion and occupation of Serbia

edit
Main article: Austro-Hungarian occupation of Serbia

Collective punishment and massacres of Serbs by Austria-Hungary

edit

During the first invasion of Serbia in 1914, Austro-Hungarian forces occupied parts of the country for 13 days. Their war aims were not only to eliminate Serbia as a threat, but also to punish the whole nation for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The invasion and military occupation accordingly turned into a war of annihilation, accompanied by massacres of civilians and the taking and summary execution of hostages.[3] Austro-Hungarian troops committed a number of war crimes against the Serbs, especially in the area of Mačva, where according to historian Geoffrey Wawro, the Austro-Hungarian army subjected the civilian population to a wave of atrocities.[4] During this short occupation, between 3,500 and 4,000 Serb civilians were killed in executions and acts of random violence by marauding troops.[5]

 
Šabac, pictured in August 1914, was the first target of the Austro-Hungarian punitive expedition and the site of many atrocities committed against the local population

Mass killings took place in numerous towns in northern Serbia. On 17 August 1914, in Šabac, 120 residents—mostly women, children and old men—were shot and buried in a churchyard by Austro-Hungarian troops on the orders of Feldmarschall-Leutnant Kasimir von Lütgendorf.[6] The remaining residents were beaten to death, hanged, stabbed, mutilated or burned alive.[7] A pit was later discovered in the village of Lešnica containing 109 dead peasants who were "bound together with a rope and encircled by wire"; they had been shot and immediately buried, even with some still alive.[8] A claim from a local spy that "traitors" were hiding in a certain house was enough to sentence the whole family to death by hanging. Serbian Orthodox priests were often summarily hanged, under the accusation of spreading the spirit of insurrection among local people. Victims were usually hanged on the main squares of villages and towns, in full view of the general population. The lifeless bodies were left to hang by the noose for several days as an act of intimidation.[9][10]

Austria's propaganda machinery spread anti-Serb sentiment with the slogan "Serbien muss sterbien" (Serbia must die).[11] During the war, Austro-Hungarian officers in Serbia ordered troops to "exterminate and burn everything that is Serbian", and hangings and mass shootings were everyday occurrences.[12] Austrian historian Anton Holzer wrote that the Austro-Hungarian army carried out "countless and systematic massacres…against the Serbian population. The soldiers invaded villages and rounded up unarmed men, women and children. They were either shot dead, bayoneted to death or hanged. The victims were locked into barns and burned alive. Women were sent up to the front lines and mass-raped. The inhabitants of whole villages were taken as hostages, humiliated and tortured."[13] Multiple source state that 30,000 Serbs, mostly civilians, were executed by Austro-Hungarian forces by the end of 1914.[11]

Forced displacement and starvation of Serbs

edit
 
Austro-Hungarian soldiers executing men and women in Serbia, 1916[14]

After being occupied completely in early 1916, both Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria announced that Serbia had ceased to exist as a political entity, and that its inhabitants could therefore not invoke the international rules of war dictating the treatment of civilians as defined by the Geneva Conventions and the Hague Conventions.[15]

The Military General Governorate of Serbia (MGG/S), as well as the High Command in Vienna, considered sending civilian prisoners to internment camps.[16] During the occupation, between 150,000 and 200,000 men, women and children were deported to various camps in Austria-Hungary;[17] it has been estimated they represented slightly more than 10 per cent of the Serb population.[18] Since Serbia did not have its own Red Cross, Serbian prisoners did not have access to the aid the Red Cross provided to other Allied prisoners.[19] Moreover, Serbian prisoners were not considered "enemy aliens" but "internal enemies" by Austria-Hungary's Ministry of War. By defining them as "terrorists" or "insurgents", the Austro-Hungarian authorities were not obliged to disclose the number of captives they held, and which camps they were being held in, to Red Cross societies.[20]

Serbs also suffered from famine; General Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf gave orders for Serbia's resources be "squeezed dry" regardless of the consequences for the population.[21] Looting by occupying soldiers,[22] combined with the food exporting policies of Austria and Germany,[23] caused mass starvation, leading to the deaths of 8,000 Serbians during the winter of 1916.[21] According to a Red Cross report dated 1 February 1918, by the end of 1917, there were 206,500 prisoners of war and internees from Serbia in Austro-Hungarian and German camps. According to the historian Alan Kramer, the Serbians in Austro-Hungarian captivity received the worst treatment of all the prisoners, and at least 30,000–40,000 had died of starvation by January 1918.[24]

Thalerhof Internment Camp

edit
Main article: Thalerhof internment camp

Austrian authorities rounded up civilians from the province of Galicia and sent them to internment camps, on charges of being part of the Galician Russophilia movement.[25]

Doboj Internment Camp

edit

45,971 Bosnian Serbs were sent to an internment camp near the city of Doboj, Bosnia between 27 December 1915 and 5 July 1917.[26]

British and Commonwealth war crimes

edit
Main article: British war crimes

Royal Navy war crimes

edit
Main article: Baralong incidents
 
HMS Baralong

On 19 August 1915, the German submarine U-27 was sunk by the British Q-ship HMS Baralong. All German survivors were killed by Baralong's crew on the orders of Lieutenant-Commander Godfrey Herbert, the captain of the ship. The shooting was reported to the media by American citizens who were on board the Nicosian, a British freighter loaded with war supplies, which was stopped by U-27 just minutes before the incident.[27]

On 24 September, Baralong destroyed U-41, which was in the process of sinking the cargo ship Urbino. According to a survivor from the submarine, Baralong continued to fly the US flag after firing on U-41 and then rammed the lifeboat carrying the German survivors, sinking it.[28]

Blockade of Germany

edit
Main article: Blockade of Germany (1914–1919)
See also: Turnip Winter

After the war, the German government claimed that approximately 763,000 German civilians died from starvation and disease during the war because of the Allied blockade.[29] An academic study done in 1928 put the death toll at 424,000.[30] Germany protested that the Allies had used starvation as a weapon of war.[31] Sally Marks argued that the German accounts of a hunger blockade are a "myth", as Germany did not face the starvation level of Belgium and the regions of Poland and northern France that it occupied.[32] Nevertheless, the eventual form of the blockade by mid-1915, being a distant blockade that made no distinction between civilian and military goods, was opposed to both the letter and spirit of the agreed but unratified 1909 London Declaration. This drew initial protest from neutral powers, though over the course of the war they would eventually cooperate with the Allies.

 
Looted shops caused by food riots in Berlin, 1918

The armistice in November 1918 specified that the blockade would continue until a formal peace agreement. Thus, foodstuffs imports into Germany continued to be controlled by the Allies until German authorities signed the Treaty of Versailles in June 1919.[33] In March 1919, Winston Churchill urged the House of Commons to come to a swift agreement as "Germany is very near starvation."[34] From January 1919 to March 1919, Germany refused to agree to Allied demands that it surrender its merchant ships to Allied ports to transport food supplies. Some Germans considered the armistice to be a temporary cessation of the war and knew, if fighting broke out again, their ships would be seized.[35] Over the winter of 1919, the situation became desperate and Germany finally agreed to surrender its fleet in March. The Allies then allowed for the import of 270,000 tons of foodstuffs.[36]

Both German and non-German observers have argued that the period after the armistice were the most devastating months of the blockade for German civilians,[37] though disagreement persists as to the extent and who is truly at fault.[38][39][40][41][42] According to Max Rubner, 100,000 German civilians died due to the continued blockade after the armistice.[43] In the UK, Labour Party member and anti-war activist Robert Smillie issued a statement in June 1919 condemning continuation of the blockade, claiming 100,000 German civilians had died as a result.[44][45]

Internment of German-Australians

edit

Before a pervasive climate among the Australian guards of excessive cruelty and unnecessary brutality led to an international diplomatic incident, the dismissal with disgrace of their commanding officer, Captain G.E. Hawkes, from the Australian Army, and it's permanent closure in 1916, the Torrens Island Concentration Camp in South Australia was used to hold both Central Powers POWs and civilian internees.[46][47][48]

Internment of Ukrainian Canadians

edit
This section is an excerpt from Ukrainian Canadian internment.[edit]
 
Commemorative plaque and a statue entitled "Why?" / "Pourquoi?" / "Чому (Chomu)?", by John Boxtel at the location of the Castle Mountain Internment Camp, Banff National Park

The Ukrainian Canadian internment was part of the confinement of "enemy aliens" in Canada during and for two years after the end of the First World War. It lasted from 1914 to 1920, under the terms of the War Measures Act.

Canada was at war with Austria-Hungary. Along with Austrian-Hungarian prisoners of war, about 8,000 Ukrainian men, women, and children – those of Ukrainian citizenship as well as naturalized Canadians of Ukrainian descent – were kept in twenty-four internment camps and related work sites (also known, at the time, as concentration camps).[49] Their savings were confiscated and many had land taken while imprisoned as the land was "abandoned". Some were "paroled" from camps in 1916–17, many were put to work as unpaid workers on farms, mines, and railways, where labour was scarce. Much existing Canadian infrastructure from 1916-1917 was built by this unpaid labour.

Another 80,000 were not imprisoned but were registered as "enemy aliens" and obliged to regularly report to the police and were required to carry identifying documents at all times or suffer punitive consequences.

The embarrassment and trauma of internment caused many Ukrainians to change their family names, hide their imprisonment and abandon traditions due to fear of negative repercussions – causing PTSD and intergenerational trauma. In addition, some maintain that the Canadian government approved key records to be destroyed in the 1950s, leaving documentation to be based on individual family records and pleas to the local communities where the camps were located.[50]

Surafend massacre

edit
This section is an excerpt from Surafend massacre.[edit]
 
A map of Sarafand al-Amar

The Surafend massacre (Arabic: مجزرة صرفند) was a premeditated massacre committed against inhabitants of the village of Sarafand al-Amar (modern-day Tzrifin) and a Bedouin camp in Ottoman Palestine by occupying Australian, New Zealand and Scottish soldiers on 10 December 1918. Occurring at the conclusion of the Sinai and Palestine campaign of World War I, Allied occupational forces in the region, in particular Australian and New Zealand troops, gradually grew frustrated over being subject to petty theft and occasional murders by local Arabs without redress.

On the night of 9 December, a New Zealand soldier was killed by an Arab thief who had stolen his kitbag. In response, troops of the ANZAC Mounted Division, as well as a small number of Scottish soldiers, surrounded Sarafand al-Amar and demanded the village's leaders hand over the thief. When they denied knowledge of the murder, the soldiers deliberated on their course of action before eventually deciding to attack the village, killing approximately 40–137 male villagers, with the only body count being 137 while others who did not count the bodies stated it was as low as 40.[51] The massacre caused a significant rift between the Division and its Commander-in-Chief, Sir Edmund Allenby.[52]

Bulgarian war crimes

edit
See also: 1922 Bulgarian war criminal prosecution referendum

Bulgarian massacres of Serbs

edit
Main article: Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I)
Further information: Štip massacre and Surdulica massacre

Bulgarian Tsar Ferdinand declared on the eve of war: "the purpose of my life is the destruction of Serbia".[53] Many Bulgarian troops were side-lined from front line duty to take part in the occupation of Serbia, past animosities led to brutality,[54] the local population was left a choice between Bulgarisation or being subject to violence, large scale deportations and the treatment of the residents of the occupation zones came close to genocidal actions.[55]

 
Exhumation of Serbs executed by Bulgarian occupiers in Surdulica between 1916 and 1918.

The Documents relatifs aux violations des Conventions de La Haye et du Droit international, commis de 1915–1918 par les Bulgares en Serbie occupée, a report covering alleged atrocities committed in Serbia, published after the war, stated that ‘anyone unwilling to submit him or herself to the occupiers and become Bulgarian was tortured, raped, interned, and killed in particularly gruesome manners, some of which recorded photographically'.[56] Bulgarian units that occupied Serbian territories showed extreme brutality, systematically expelling the non-Bulgarian population in the regions they occupied, they arrested the population and set the rebel villages on fire.[57]

In addition to the numerous cases of rape, Bulgarian forces encouraged the mixed marriage of Serbian women with Bulgarian men and espoused the view that children born to such marriages should be raised as Bulgarians.[58] Middle-class Serbian functionaries were also suppressed: teachers, religious workers, functionaries, and intellectuals were executed by the Bulgarian soldiers who were following strict instructions to treat civilians the same way they treated soldiers.[59] Additionally, there were regular bombardments of Serbian territories by the aviation and Bulgarian artillery which were operating on the Balkan front around the end of 1916.[60] At the same time, there was a prohibition of Serbian culture; Bulgarians systematically looted Serbian monasteries and the toponymy of villages was changed to Bulgarian.[60]

In addition to those sent to concentration camps, some 30,000 Serbs were sent to Austrian camps or used as forced labour. Factories were plundered of their machinery and a devastating typhus epidemic stalked the land. Thousands died in desperate uprisings, and in some cases, Bulgarian policy was so rigid that it even provoked mutinies among its own soldiers. The Bulgarian soldiers are depicted as simply living off the land without paying any redistribution and also robbing and hitting civilians, whereas the peasants had to work for the occupational authorities without getting any pay, this sometimes included working on defensive positions and carrying ammunition for the Bulgarians which violated the Hague conventions.[61]

German war crimes

edit
Main article: German war crimes
Further information: Schrecklichkeit, Bandenbekämpfung, and Leipzig war crimes trials
See also: List of German-sponsored acts of terrorism during World War I

Bombardment of English coastal towns

edit
Main article: Raid on Scarborough, Hartlepool and Whitby

On 16 December 1914, the Imperial German Navy launched a raid on the British seaport towns of Scarborough, Hartlepool, West Hartlepool, and Whitby. The attack resulted in 137 fatalities and 592 casualties. The raid was in violation of the ninth section of the 1907 Hague Convention which prohibited naval bombardments of undefended towns without warning,[62] because only Hartlepool was protected by shore batteries.[63] Germany was a signatory of the 1907 Hague Convention.[64]

Indiscriminate attacks in German-occupied territory

edit

In response to actions by Russian prisoners (many of whom tried to sabotage German plans and kill German soldiers), Germany resorted to harsh pacification measures and terror actions, including brutal reprisals against civilians.[65] Before long, similar practices were instituted throughout the Eastern and Western areas of German occupied territory.[66]

Destruction of Kalisz, Poland

edit
This section is an excerpt from Destruction of Kalisz.[edit]
The destruction of Kalisz (Polish: zburzenie Kalisza) by German troops took place from 2 August until 22 August 1914 at the beginning of World War I. The event is also known as the Pogrom of Kalisz or Poland's Louvain.

Rape of Belgium

edit
Main articles: German occupation of Belgium during World War I and Rape of Belgium
Further information: Sack of Dinant, Sack of Louvain, and Massacre of Tamines
 
Victims of the 1914 sack of Dinant

The Imperial German Army ignored many of the commonly-understood European conventions of war when between August and October 1914, some 6,500 French and Belgian citizens were murdered,[67][a] often in near-random, large-scale shootings ordered by junior German commanders. On some occasions, attacks against German infantry positions and patrols that may have actually been attributable to "friendly fire" were blamed on francs-tireurs (guerrillas), who were regarded as bandits and outside the rules of war, eliciting ruthless measures by German forces against the civilians and villages suspected of harboring them. In addition, they tended to suspect that most civilians were potential francs-tireurs, with German soldiers taking, and sometimes killing, hostages from among the civilian population.[69][70]

 
The University Hall library in Leuven in 1915, destroyed following the German occupation.

The Germans treated any resistance in Belgium—such as sabotaging rail lines—as illegal and immoral, and shot the offenders and burned buildings in retaliation. The German Army destroyed 15,000–20,000 buildings—most infamously the university library at Leuven—and generated a wave of refugees, numbering at over a million people. Over half the German regiments in Belgium were involved in major incidents.[70] In destroying the Leuven library, Germany violated it's obligation, as a signatory to the 1907 Hague Convention, that "in sieges and bombardment, all necessary steps must be taken to spare, as far as possible, buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes"; the Treaty of Versailles, one of the treaties that ended the war, included a clause to strengthen the protection of cultural property.[71] Large numbers of cases of rape were also reported.[72]

British propaganda dramatising the Rape of Belgium attracted much attention in the United States, while Berlin said it was both lawful and necessary because of the threat of franc-tireurs like those in France in 1870.[73] The British and French press were mostly factual in their reporting of the atrocities, but wrote about them "in the language of vilification". Thus, as accounts were disseminated at home and in the United States, they played a major role in dissolving support for Germany.[74][75]

German complicity in the Armenian genocide

edit
This section is an excerpt from Germany and the Armenian genocide.[edit]
During World War I, Germany was a military ally of the Ottoman Empire, which perpetrated the Armenian genocide. Many Germans present in eastern and southern Anatolia witnessed the genocide, but censorship and self-censorship hampered these reports, while German newspapers reported Ottoman denials of the genocide. Approximately 800 officers and 25,000 soldiers of the Imperial German Army were sent to the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I to fight alongside the Ottoman Army, with German commanders serving in the Ottoman high command and general staff. It is known that individual German military advisors signed some of the orders that led to Ottoman deportations of Armenians, a major component of the genocide.[76][77][78][79]

Unrestricted submarine warfare

edit
Main article: U-boat campaign
 
 
Submarine warfare zones, declared by Germany on February 1915 and February 1917 respectively.

Unrestricted submarine warfare was instituted in 1915 in response to the British naval blockade of Germany. Germany intended to starve Britain as well, but unlike the British, prize rules, which were codified under the 1907 Hague Convention—such as those that required commerce raiders to warn their targets and allow time for the crew to board lifeboats—were disregarded and commercial vessels were sunk regardless of nationality, cargo, or destination. Following the sinking of the RMS Lusitania on 7 May 1915 and subsequent public outcry in various neutral countries, including the United States, the practice was withdrawn. However, Germany resumed the practice on 1 February 1917 and declared that all merchant ships regardless of nationalities would be sunk without warning. This outraged the U.S. public, prompting the U.S. to break diplomatic relations with Germany two days later, and, along with the Zimmermann Telegram, led the U.S. entry into the war two months later on the side of the Allied Powers. Around 15,000 British civilian sailors were killed in the submarine campaign, with a smaller number from other states.[80]

While the German attempt at a blockade was much less successful in terms of inflicting civilian suffering, during the war and prior to World War II, Germany's actions were widely considered to be a greater war crime,[81] and are technically still illegal today.[82]

Sinking of hospital ships

edit
This section is an excerpt from List of hospital ships sunk in World War I.[edit]
During the First World War, many hospital ships were attacked, sometimes deliberately and sometimes as a result of mistaken identity. They were sunk by either torpedo, mine or surface attack. They were easy targets, since they carried hundreds of wounded soldiers from the front lines.

Torpedoing of HMHS Llandovery Castle

edit
See also: Unrestricted submarine warfare

The Canadian hospital ship HMHS Llandovery Castle was torpedoed by the German submarine SM U-86 on 27 June 1918 in violation of international law. Only 24 of the 258 medical personnel, patients, and crew survived. Survivors reported that the U-boat surfaced and ran down the lifeboats, machine-gunning survivors in the water. The U-boat captain, Helmut Brümmer-Patzig, was charged with war crimes in Germany following the war, but escaped prosecution by going to the Free City of Danzig, beyond the jurisdiction of German courts.[83]

Japanese war crimes

edit
Main article: Japanese war crimes
Further information: Siege of Tsingtao and Japan during World War I

During the march towards the German port in Tsingtao and the siege that followed, Japanese forces killed 98 Chinese civilians and wounded 30; there were also countless incidents of war rape against Chinese women committed by Japanese soldiers.[84]

Ottoman war crimes

edit
Further information: Prosecution of Ottoman war criminals after World War I, Istanbul trials of 1919–1920, and Malta exiles
See also: Turkish war crimes and Late Ottoman genocides

Genocide and ethnic cleansing

edit

Armenian genocide

edit
Main article: Armenian genocide
 
Armenians killed during the Armenian genocide. Image taken from Ambassador Morgenthau's Story, written by Henry Morgenthau Sr. and published in 1918.[85]

In the final years of the Ottoman Empire's existence, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) committed a genocide against the empire's Armenian population.[86][87][88] The Ottomans carried out organised, systematic massacres and deportations of Armenians throughout the war, and they portrayed acts of resistance by Armenians as rebellions in an attempt to justify their extermination campaign.[89] In early 1915, a number of Armenians volunteered to join the Russian forces, and the Ottoman government used this as a pretext to issue the Tehcir Law (Law on Deportation), which authorised the deportation of Armenians from the Empire's eastern provinces to Syria between 1915 and 1918. The Armenians were intentionally marched to death, and a large number of them were attacked by Ottoman brigands.[90] While the exact number of deaths is unknown, the International Association of Genocide Scholars estimates that 1.5 million Armenians were killed.[86][91] The government of Turkey has consistently denied the genocide, arguing that those who died were victims of inter-ethnic fighting, famine, or disease during World War I; these claims are rejected by most historians.[92] Other ethnic groups were also attacked by the Ottoman Empire during this period, including Assyrians and Greeks, and some scholars consider those events different parts of the same policy of extermination.[93][94]

Greek genocide

edit
Main article: Greek genocide
 
Monument in Argos, Greece for the Greek genocide and the Holocaust.

Genocidal policies against Ottoman Greeks were already put in place by the CUP prior to World War I,[95] and continued after the war began. According to a newspaper of the time, in November 1914, Turkish troops destroyed Christian properties and killed several Christians at Trabzon.[96] The CUP officially sanctioned the forceful migration of Greeks into the Anatolian hinterland.[97] In the fall of 1916, with Allied forces advancing towards Anatolia, and Greece being expected to enter the war on the side of the Allies, preparations were made for the deportation of Greeks living in border areas.[98] As such, in March 1917 the population of Ayvalık, a town of c. 30,000 inhabitants on the Aegean coast, was forcibly deported to the interior of Anatolia under the orders of German General Liman von Sanders. The operation included death marches, looting, torture and massacres against the civilian population.[99][100] between 1914 and 1922, and for the whole of Anatolia, there are academic estimates of a death toll ranging from 300,000 to 750,000.[101][102][103]

Sayfo

edit
Main article: Sayfo
 
Orphaned Assyrian refugees in Qajar Iran, 1918

Happening contemporaneously was the Sayfo, a genocide of Assyrian people. In mid-1915, interior minister Talaat Pasha ordered for an ethnic cleansing campaign against the Assyrians of Hakkari,[104][105] and Ottoman forces proceeded to loot Assyrian villages there and destroy cultural artifacts,[106][107] taking no prisoners as they did so.[107] Many Assyrians fled to Iran,[108] but after the Ottomans began occupying parts of Iran, Djevdet Bey ordered massacres of Christian civilians to prevent them from joining to fight for Russia.[109] Between February and May (when the Ottoman forces pulled out), there was a campaign of mass execution, looting, kidnapping, and extortion against Christians in Urmia,[110][111] and Assyrian women were targeted for kidnapping and rape;[112][113] seventy villages were destroyed.[114] Halil Kut and Djevdet Bey ordered the murder of Armenian and Syriac soldiers serving in the Ottoman army, and several hundred were killed.[115][116] By 1923, the genocide killed an estimated 250,000 to 275,000 Assyrian Christians (about half of the population).[117][118]

Deportations of Kurds

edit
Main article: Deportations of Kurds (1916–1934)

A policy of deporting Ottoman Kurds from their indigenous lands also began during World War I, under the orders of Talaat Pasha.[119] Although many Kurds were loyal to the empire (with some even supporting the persecution of Christian minorities by the CUP), Turkish authorities nevertheless feared the possibility that they would collaborate with Armenians and Russians to establish their own Kurdish state.[120] In 1916, roughly 300,000 Kurds were deported from Bitlis, Erzurum, Palu and Muş to Konya and Gaziantep during the winter, and most died from famine.[121]

Deportations in Ottoman Palestine

edit
Main article: 1917 Jaffa deportation

In December 1915, the Ottoman's expelled roughly 6,000 Jews with Russian citizenship in Jaffa to Egypt.[122][123] As British forces advanced towards Palestine in 1917, Ottoman authorities began deporting and expelling people throughout Palestine, targeting Jews in particular. In March 1917, everyone living in Gaza (at the time, a town of 35,000–40,000 people, mostly Arabs) was expelled, and the population would not recover until the 1940s.[124] That same month – on the orders of Djemal Pasha – tens of thousands of people were deported from Jaffa, an action that was accompanied by severe violence, starvation, theft, persecution and abuse.[125][126][127][128] When New Zealand troops arrived to Jaffa in November 1917, only 8,000 of the original population of 40,000 remained.[129]

Ottoman mistreatment of prisoners of war

edit
This section is an excerpt from Prisoners of war in World War I § POWs in the Ottoman Empire.[edit]
The Ottoman Empire often treated POWs poorly.[130] Some 11,800 British Empire soldiers, most of them Indians, became prisoners after the siege of Kut in Mesopotamia in April 1916; 4,250 died in captivity.[131] Although many were in a poor condition when captured, Ottoman officers forced them to march 1,100 kilometres (684 mi) to Anatolia. A survivor said: "We were driven along like beasts; to drop out was to die."[132]

Russian war crimes

edit
Main article: Russian war crimes
See also: Central Asian revolt of 1916

Pogroms and ethnic cleansing

edit
Further information: Pogroms in the Russian Empire and Pogroms during the Russian Civil War
 
Depiction of the Lwów pogrom (1914), perpetrated by Imperial Russian forces.

During the war, Russian authorities organized pogroms against German populations in Russian cities, massacred Jews in their towns and shtetls, and deported 500,000 Jews and 250,000 Germans into the Russian interior. In March 1915, after the Austro-Hungarian Army surrendered Przemyśl to the Imperial Russian Army following a siege of the city fortress, Tsarist troops celebrated by launching a pogrom against the city's whole Jewish population.[133][134] On 11 June 1915, a pogrom also began against ethnic Germans in Petrograd, with over 500 factories, stores and offices looted and mob violence unleashed against Germans. After the Great Retreat of the Russian army, the Chief of the General Staff Nikolai Yanushkevich, with the full support of the Grand Duke Nicholas, ordered the army to devastate the border territories and expel the "enemy" nations within, meaning both Jews and ethnic Germans, to internal exile in Siberia.[135][136]

Many pogroms also accompanied the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the ensuing Russian Civil War. 50,000–250,000 civilian Jews were killed in atrocities throughout the former Russian Empire (mostly within the Pale of Settlement in present-day Ukraine).[137][138] There were an estimated 7–12 million casualties during the Russian Civil War, mostly civilians.[139]

Deportations from East Prussia

edit
This section is an excerpt from Deportations from East Prussia during World War I.[edit]
In 1914–1915, the Russian Empire forcibly deported local inhabitants from Russian-occupied areas of East Prussia to more remote areas of the empire, particularly Siberia. The official rationale was to reduce espionage and other resistance behind the Russian front lines.[140] As many as 13,600 people, including children and the elderly, were deported.[141] Due to difficult living conditions, the mortality rates were high, and only 8,300 people returned home after the war.[141]

War crimes by both Allied and Central Powers

edit

Use of chemical weapons

edit
Main article: Chemical weapons in World War I
 
French soldiers making a gas and flame attack on German trenches in Flanders

The use of chemical weapons in warfare was in direct violation of the 1899 Hague Declaration Concerning Asphyxiating Gases and the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare, which prohibited their use and which all major combatants had signed.[142][143] Even so, the German army was the first to successfully deploy chemical weapons during the Second Battle of Ypres (22 April – 25 May 1915), after German scientists working under the direction of Fritz Haber at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute developed a method to weaponize chlorine.[b][144] The use of chemical weapons was sanctioned by the German High Command in an effort to force Allied soldiers out of their entrenched positions, complementing rather than supplanting more lethal conventional weapons.[144] The British Army first deployed chemical weapons, namely chlorine gas, at the Battle of Loos, which proved not only unsuccessful, but resulted in one of the most disastrous friendly fire incidents of the Great War, as the wind blew the gas right back into Allied lines.[145]

In time, chemical weapons were deployed by all major belligerents throughout the war, inflicting approximately 500k-1.3 million casualties, but relatively few fatalities: About 26-90,000 in total.[144][146] For example, there were an estimated 186,000 British chemical weapons casualties during the war (80% of which were the result of exposure to the vesicant sulfur mustard, introduced to the battlefield by the Germans in July 1917, which burns the skin at any point of contact and inflicts more severe lung damage than chlorine or phosgene),[144] and up to one-third of American casualties were caused by them. The Imperial Russian Army reportedly suffered roughly 500,000 chemical weapon casualties in World War I.[147] Civilians were not deliberately targeted but nearby towns were at risk from winds blowing the poison gases through. Only the French took precautions to avoid such collateral damage. Initially, civilians rarely had a warning system or access to effective gas masks, but this improved later in the war. Official Allied numbers of civilian casualties of German attacks are around 1300, a likely underestimate. The number of civilian casualties of Allied gas attacks is not known. There were also thousands of injuries in weapons production facilities.[144][148]

The war damaged the prestige of chemistry in European societies, especially the German variety.[149]

Massacres of Albanians

edit
Main article: Massacres of Albanians in World War I

During the Balkan Wars, Albanians were massacred by members of the Balkan League, mostly by Serbian and Montenegrin Chetnik forces. These massacres continued during the First World War as foreign armies entered Albania. Bulgarian, Serbian, Montenegrin, and Greek forces committed several atrocities in Albania, during occupation, and in other regions inhabited by Albanians. Many villages were burned and destroyed, leaving 330,000 people without homes by 1915.[150] According to the Committee of Kosovo, 50,000 Albanians were killed by Central Powers affiliated Bulgarian forces and around 200,000 Albanians were killed by Allied affiliated Serbian and Montenegrin forces.[151]

Impacts on international law

edit

Crimes against humanity and genocide as international crimes

edit
Further information: May 1915 Triple Entente declaration
 
Version of the declaration forwarded to the Ottoman Empire by the U.S. State Department.

On 24 May 1915, on the initiative of Russia, the Triple Entente—Russia, France, and the United Kingdom—issued a declaration condemning the Ottomans for committing "crimes […] against humanity and civilization" against the Armenians, threatening to hold the perpetrators accountable.[152] Although the phrase "crimes against humanity" had been used prior to this,[153][154] it was the first time the phrase was used in the context of international diplomacy,[155][156] and it later became a category of international criminal law after World War II.[157]

Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term genocide in 1944, became interested in the prosecution of war crimes after reading about the 1921 trial of Soghomon Tehlirian for the assassination of Talaat Pasha. Lemkin recognized the fate of the Armenians as one of the most significant genocides in the twentieth century.[158][159][160]

Establishment of the Geneva Protocol

edit
Main article: Geneva Protocol

The Geneva Protocol, signed by 132 nations on 17 June 1925, was a treaty established to ban the use of chemical and biological weapons during wartime. As stated by Coupland and Leins, "it was fostered in part by a 1918 appeal in which the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) described the use of poisonous gas against soldiers as a barbarous invention which science is bringing to perfection".[161] The Protocol required that all remaining stockpiles of chemical weapons be destroyed. Chemical warfare agents that contained bromine, nitroaromatic, and chlorine were dismantled and destroyed.[162] The destruction and disposal of the chemicals did not consider the long-term and adverse impacts on the environment. Although the Geneva Protocol banned the use of chemical weapons during wartime, the Protocol did not ban the production of chemical weapons.[163] In fact, since the Geneva Protocol, the stockpiling of chemical weapons has continued, and weapons have become more lethal. As a result, the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) was drafted in 1993, which prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons. Despite there being an international ban on chemical warfare, the CWC "allows domestic law enforcement agencies of the signing countries to use chemical weapons on their citizens".[164]

See also

edit
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to War crimes in World War I.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ The German troops were merciless in spite of the international efforts highlighted by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, which included injunctions codifying and restraining "both the conduct of irregular warfare and the measures to which an occupying power should be entitled in order to combat it".[68]
  2. ^ A German attempt to use chemical weapons on the Russian front in January 1915 failed to cause casualties.

References

edit
  1. ^ Thomas P. Lowry, MD (1997), Tarnished Eagles: The Courts-Martial of Fifty Union Colonels and Lieutenant Colonels, Stackpoole Books. p. 161.
  2. ^ Thomas P. Lowry, MD (1997), Tarnished Eagles: The Courts-Martial of Fifty Union Colonels and Lieutenant Colonels, Stackpoole Books. p. 163.
  3. ^ Jeřábek 1991, p. 25.
  4. ^ Wawro 2014, p. 195.
  5. ^ Kramer 2008, p. 140.
  6. ^ Holzer, Anton (2008-10-06). "Geschichte". Der Spiegel (in German).
  7. ^ Hastings 2013, p. 226.
  8. ^ Reiss 2019, p. 34.
  9. ^ Holzer 2014, p. 12.
  10. ^ Holzer 2014, p. 241.
  11. ^ a b Deutsche Welle. "Austrougarski zločini u Srbiji | DW | 12 October 2014". DW.COM (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  12. ^ DiNardo 2015, p. 68.
  13. ^ "A History of the First World War in 100 Moments: Austro-Hungarian army". The Independent. 7 April 2014. Archived from the original on 17 February 2018. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
  14. ^ Honzík, Miroslav; Honzíková, Hana (1984). 1914/1918, Léta zkázy a naděje. Czech Republic: Panorama.
  15. ^ "Prisoners of War in Bulgaria during the First World War". Faculty of History, Cambridge University. 2017-06-06.
  16. ^ Stojančević 1988, p. 34.
  17. ^ Luthar 2016, p. 76.
  18. ^ Winter 2014, p. 257.
  19. ^ DiNardo 2015, p. 122.
  20. ^ Stibbe 2019, p. 111.
  21. ^ a b Calic & Geyer 2019, p. 157.
  22. ^ Calic & Geyer 2019, p. 166.
  23. ^ Herwig 2014, p. 239.
  24. ^ Kramer 2008, p. 67.
  25. ^ "The Internment of Russophiles in Austria-Hungary". 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopaedia of the First World War. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
  26. ^ Mirčeta, Vemić (June 20, 2022). "The Pomor of Serb POWs and Civilians in Austro-Hungarian camps during WWI 1914-1918, DOBOJ". Books of Jeremiah.
  27. ^ Halpern, Paul G. (1994). A Naval History of World War I. Routledge, p. 301; ISBN 978-1-85728-498-0
  28. ^ Hadley, Michael L. (1995). Count Not the Dead: The Popular Image of the German Submarine. McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP, p. 36; ISBN 978-0-7735-1282-5.
  29. ^ "The blockade of Germany". nationalarchives.gov.uk. The National Archives. Archived from the original on 22 July 2004. Retrieved 11 November 2018.
  30. ^ Grebler, Leo (1940). The Cost of the World War to Germany and Austria–Hungary. Yale University Press. p. 78
  31. ^ Cox, Mary Elisabeth (21 September 2014). "Hunger games: or how the Allied blockade in the First World War deprived German children of nutrition, and Allied food aid subsequently saved them. Abstract". The Economic History Review. 68 (2): 600–631. doi:10.1111/ehr.12070. ISSN 0013-0117. S2CID 142354720.
  32. ^ Marks 2013.
  33. ^ Mowat 1968, p. 213.
  34. ^ Fuller 1993.
  35. ^ Marks 2013, p. 650.
  36. ^ "Lebensmittelabkommen in Brüssel" [Food agreement in Brussels] (in German). Das Bundesarchiv. Archived from the original on 11 July 2016.
  37. ^ Paul, C. (1985). The politics of hunger: the allied blockade of Germany, 1915–1919. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-8214-0831-5.
  38. ^ Marks 2013, p. 651.
  39. ^ Verhandlung der verfassungsgebenden Nationalversammlung: Stenographische Berichte und Drucksachen [Proceedings of the National Constituent Assembly: Stenographic reports and printed matter] (in German). Vol. 24. German National Assembly. 1919. pp. 631–635.
  40. ^ "Die Finanzierung des Lebensmittels" [Paying for food imports]. Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). 2 February 1919.
  41. ^ Roerkohl, Anne (1991). Hungerblockade und Heimatfront: Die kommunale Lebensmittelversorgung in Westfalen während des Ersten Weltkrieges [The hunger blockade and the home front: communal food supply in Westphalia during World War I] (in German). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. p. 348. ISBN 978-351505661-8.
  42. ^ Rudloff, Wilfried (1998). Die Wohlfahrtsstadt: Kommunale Ernährungs-, Fürsorge, und Wohnungspolitik am Beispiel Münchens 1910–1933. Schriftenreihe der Historischen Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 63 (in German). Göttingen: Vandenhooeck & Ruprecht. p. 184. ISBN 3-525-36056-8.
  43. ^ Rubner, Max (10 April 1919). "Von der Blockde und Aehlichen". Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 45 (15). Berlin: 15. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1137673. S2CID 72845627.
  44. ^ Common Sense (London) 5 July 1919.
  45. ^ Bane, S.L. (1942). The Blockade of Germany after the Armistice. Stanford University Press. p. 791.
  46. ^ Torrens Island Revelations, The Mail, 17 May 1919. Trove, National Library of Australia. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  47. ^ Chronicle, 30 November 1918.
  48. ^ National Archives of Australia Series MP367/1 Item 567/3/2202 Captain G.E. Hawkes Court of Enquiry 1915–1919 (Some images online at http://naa12.naa.gov.au/scripts/Imagine.asp?B=5809579)
  49. ^ "Internment of Ukrainians in Canada 1914–1920". Retrieved 1 April 2010.
  50. ^ "Internment of Ukrainians in Canada 1914-1920".
  51. ^ Daley, Paul (2009). Beersheba (Paperback). Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Melbourne University Press. pp. 252–272, 273–276, 295–297, 300–304. ISBN 9780522855999.
  52. ^ Elliott, Tim (24 July 2009). "Massacre that stained the Light Horse". The Age. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  53. ^ Glenny 2012, p. 333.
  54. ^ Mitrović 2007, p. 126.
  55. ^ Mojzes 2011, p. 41.
  56. ^ Mojzes 2011, p. 41-42.
  57. ^ Batakovic 2005, p. 32.
  58. ^ Le Moal 2008, p. 118.
  59. ^ Le Moal 2008, p. 119.
  60. ^ a b Le Moal 2008, p. 121.
  61. ^ Reiss 2018, p. 17.
  62. ^ Marshall, Logan (1915). Horrors and atrocities of the great war: Including the tragic destruction of the Lusitania: A new kind of warfare: Comprising the desolation of Belgium: The sacking of Louvain: The shelling of defenseless cities: The wanton destruction of cathedrals and works of art: The horrors of bomb dropping: Vividly portraying the grim awfulness of this greatest of all wars fought on land and sea: In the air and under the waves: Leaving in its wake a dreadful trail of famine and pestilence. G. F. Lasher. p. 240. Retrieved 5 July 2013. German Navy December 1914 Hague Convention bombardment.
  63. ^ Chuter, David (2003). War Crimes: Confronting Atrocity in the Modern World. London: Lynne Rienner Pub. p. 300. ISBN 1-58826-209-X.
  64. ^ Willmore, John (1918). The great crime and its moral. New York: Doran. p. 340.
  65. ^ Blood 2006, pp. 22–23.
  66. ^ Blood 2006, pp. 24–25.
  67. ^ Blood 2006, p. 20.
  68. ^ Shepherd & Pattinson 2010, p. 15.
  69. ^ Leonhard 2018, p. 151.
  70. ^ a b Horne & Kramer 2001, ch 1–2, esp. p. 76.
  71. ^ Ovenden 2020, p. 110.
  72. ^ Horne & Kramer 2001, pp. 196–199.
  73. ^ The claim of franc-tireurs in Belgium has been rejected: Horne & Kramer 2001, ch 3–4
  74. ^ Horne & Kramer 2001, pp. 206–210.
  75. ^ Keegan 1998, pp. 82–83.
  76. ^ ""Sie mussten sich auskleiden und wurden sämtlich niedergemacht"". Der Spiegel. 2 June 2016. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  77. ^ "Das Deutsche Reich und seine Verstrickung in den Völkermord an den Armeniern". Haypress. 1 April 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  78. ^ "Der Tod in deutschem Interesse". Die Tageszeitung. 24 April 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  79. ^ Wolfgang Gust: Der Völkermord an den Armeniern 1915/16. Dokumente aus dem Politischen Archiv des deutschen Auswärtigen Amtes. 1915-11-18-DE-001. Armenocide. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  80. ^ "A short history of the merchant navy". Imperial War Museum.
  81. ^ F. Cyril James (1927). "Modern Developments of the Law of Prize". University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. 75 (6): 505–526. doi:10.2307/3307534. JSTOR 3307534.
  82. ^ Jon L. Jacobson. "The Law of Submarine Warfare Today". International Law Studies. 64: 222–224.
  83. ^ Davies, J.D. (2013). Britannia's Dragon: A Naval History of Wales. History Press Limited. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-7524-9410-4.
  84. ^ Tang, Chi-hua: War Losses and Reparations (China), in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War
  85. ^ Henry Morgenthau (1918). "XXV: Talaat Tells Why He "Deports" the Armenians". Ambassador Mogenthau's story. Brigham Young University. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 6 June 2012.
  86. ^ a b International Association of Genocide Scholars (13 June 2005). "Open Letter to the Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan". Archived from the original on 6 October 2007.
  87. ^ Göçek 2015, p. 1.
  88. ^ Suny 2015, pp. 374–375.
  89. ^ Vartparonian, Paul Leverkuehn; Kaiser (2008). A German officer during the Armenian genocide: a biography of Max von Scheubner-Richter. translated by Alasdair Lean; with a preface by Jorge and a historical introduction by Hilmar. London: Taderon Press for the Gomidas Institute. ISBN 978-1-903656-81-5. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
  90. ^ Ferguson 2006, p. 177.
  91. ^ "International Association of Genocide Scholars" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  92. ^ Fromkin 1989, pp. 212–215.
  93. ^ International Association of Genocide Scholars. "Resolution on genocides committed by the Ottoman empire" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 April 2008.
  94. ^ Schaller & Zimmerer 2008, pp. 7–14.
  95. ^ Akçam 2012, pp. 68 f.
  96. ^ "Turkey. Massacre of Christians at Trebizond". Maryborough Chronicle, Wide Bay and Burnett Advertiser. No. 12, 956. Queensland, Australia. 25 November 1914. p. 4. Retrieved 15 February 2021 – via National Library of Australia.
  97. ^ Akçam 2012, p. 97.
  98. ^ Akçam 2012, pp. 109 f.
  99. ^ Akçam 2004, p. 146.
  100. ^ Rendel 1922.
  101. ^ Jones 2010, pp. 150–151, 166: "By the beginning of the First World War, a majority of the region's ethnic Greeks still lived in present-day Turkey, mostly in Thrace (the only remaining Ottoman territory in Europe, abutting the Greek border), and along the Aegean and Black Sea coasts. They would be targeted both prior to and alongside the Armenians of Anatolia and Assyrians of Anatolia and Mesopotamia ... The major populations of 'Anatolian Greeks' include those along the Aegean coast and in Cappadocia (central Anatolia), but not the Greeks of the Thrace region west of the Bosphorus ... A 'Christian genocide' framing acknowledges the historic claims of Assyrian and Greek peoples, and the movements now stirring for recognition and restitution among Greek and Assyrian diasporas. It also brings to light the quite staggering cumulative death toll among the various Christian groups targeted ... of the 1.5 million Greeks of Asia minor – Ionians, Pontians, and Cappadocians – approximately 750,000 were massacred and 750,000 exiled. Pontian deaths alone totaled 353,000."
  102. ^ Hatzidimitriou 2005, p. 2.
  103. ^ Valavanis 1925, p. 24.
  104. ^ Gaunt 2015, pp. 93–94.
  105. ^ Gaunt 2006, p. 142.
  106. ^ Hellot-Bellier 2018, p. 129.
  107. ^ a b Gaunt 2006, p. 312.
  108. ^ Hellot-Bellier 2018, pp. 117, 125.
  109. ^ Gaunt 2006, p. 106.
  110. ^ Gaunt 2006, p. 110.
  111. ^ Hellot-Bellier 2018, pp. 121–122.
  112. ^ Naby 2017, p. 167.
  113. ^ Kévorkian 2011, p. 227.
  114. ^ Hofmann 2018, p. 30.
  115. ^ Gaunt 2006, pp. 108–109.
  116. ^ Gaunt 2011, p. 255.
  117. ^ Whitehorn, Alan (2015). The Armenian Genocide: The Essential Reference Guide: The Essential Reference Guide. ABC-CLIO. pp. 83, 218. ISBN 978-1-61069-688-3. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2018.
  118. ^ Gaunt 2015, pp. 88, 96.
  119. ^ Üngör 2011, pp. 110–111.
  120. ^ Üngör 2011, p. 108.
  121. ^ Schaller & Zimmerer 2008, pp. 7–8.
  122. ^ Mary McCune (July 2005). The Whole Wide World, Without Limits: International relief, gender politics, and American Jewish women, 1893–1930. Wayne State University Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-8143-3229-0. Archived from the original on May 13, 2020. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  123. ^ Jonathan R. Adelman (2008). The Rise of Israel: A history of a revolutionary state. Routledge. pp. 58–59. ISBN 978-0-415-77510-6. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  124. ^ Doton Halevy (2015). "The rear side of the front: Gaza and its people in World War I". Journal of Levantine Studies. 5 (1): 35–57.
  125. ^ "CRUEL TO PALESTINE JEWS.; Turks Loot and Slay Victims Deported as a "Military Measure."". New York Times. May 8, 1917. p. 4.
  126. ^ "TURKS KILLING JEWS WHO RESIST PILLAGE; Washington Gets Confirmation of Reports of Atrocities in Palestine". New York Times. May 19, 1917. p. 7.
  127. ^ "CRUELTIES TO JEWS DEPORTED IN JAFFA; Alexandria Consul Says They Were Robbed, Assaulted, and Some Were Slain. POPULATION WAS STARVED Tale That Same Fate Awaits All Jews In Palestine--Djemal Pasha Blamed". New York Times. June 3, 1917. pp. Section E, page 23.
  128. ^ "The Banality of Indifference: Zionism and the Armenian Genocide". Routledge & CRC Press. pp. 82–83. Retrieved 2023-11-09.
  129. ^ Yigal Sheffy (2009). "?גירוש יהודי תל אביב 1917: התעמרות פוליטית או כורח צבאי (Deportation of the Jews of Tel Aviv 1917: Political abuse or military necessity?)". Fighting at the entrances of Jaffa and the Yarkon victory : 8th Annual conference of the WW1 Heritage Association in Israel. pp. 22–30.
  130. ^ Bass 2002, p. 107.
  131. ^ "The Mesopotamia campaign". British National Archives. Archived from the original on 29 October 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2007.
  132. ^ "Prisoners of Turkey: Men of Kut Driven along like beasts". Stolen Years: Australian Prisoners of War. Australian War Memorial. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 10 December 2008.
  133. ^ Palmer, Svetlana; Wallis, Sarah (2003). A War in Words. Simon & Schuster. pp. 87–88. ISBN 0-7432-4831-7.
  134. ^ Edited by Svetlana Palmer and Sarah Wallis (3002), Intimate Voices from the First World War, William Morrow. pp. 69-93.
  135. ^ Baberowski & Doering-Manteuffel 2009, pp. 202–203.
  136. ^ McMeekin 2017, p. 68.
  137. ^ Klier, J.D., Pogroms, The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe
  138. ^ Vital, David (1999). A People Apart: The Jews in Europe, 1789-1939. Oxford University Press. pp. 715–727. ISBN 0198219806.
  139. ^ Mawdsley 2007, p. 287.
  140. ^ Buttar, Prit (2017). Germany Ascendant: The Eastern Front 1915. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 171. ISBN 978-1-4728-1355-8.
  141. ^ a b Kramer, Alan (2012). "Combatants and Noncombatants: Atrocities, Massacres, and War Crimes". In Horne, John (ed.). A Companion to World War I. John Wiley & Sons. p. 191. ISBN 978-1-119-96870-2.
  142. ^ Taylor, Telford (1993). The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. Little, Brown and Company. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-316-83400-1. Retrieved 20 June 2013.
  143. ^ Graham, Thomas; Lavera, Damien J. (2003). Cornerstones of Security: Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era. University of Washington Press. pp. 7–9. ISBN 978-0-295-98296-0. Retrieved 5 July 2013.
  144. ^ a b c d e Fitzgerald, Gerard (April 2008). "Chemical Warfare and Medical Response During World War I". American Journal of Public Health. 98 (4): 611–625. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.11930. PMC 2376985. PMID 18356568.
  145. ^ Holmes, Richard (1981). The Little Field Marshal, A Life of Sir John French. Cassell Military Paperbacks, 2005 edition. pp. 302–305. ISBN 978-0-304-36702-3.
  146. ^ Haber 2002, pp. 239–244.
  147. ^ Schneider, Barry R. (28 February 1999). Future War and Counterproliferation: US Military Responses to NBC. Praeger. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-275-96278-4.
  148. ^ Haber, L. F. (2002). The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical warfare in the First World War. pp. 248–253. ISBN 9780191512315.
  149. ^ Johnson, Jeffrey Allan (2017). "Military-Industrial Interactions in the Development of Chemical Warfare, 1914–1918: Comparing National Cases Within the Technological System of the Great War". In Friedrich, Bretislav; Hoffmann, Dieter; Renn, Jürgen; Schmaltz, Florian; Wolf, Martin (eds.). One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 147–148. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6. ISBN 978-3-319-51664-6. Archived from the original on 17 February 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  150. ^ D. Skopiansky, M. (1919). Les Atrocités Serbes (PDF). p. 119.
  151. ^ Elsie, Robert; D. Destani, Bejtullah (2019). Kosovo, A Documentary History: From the Balkan Wars to World War II. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9781838600037.
  152. ^ Ghazanchyan, Siranush (24 May 2020). "105 years ago Entente Powers called the massacre of Armenians "crimes against humanity"". Public Radio of Armenia. Retrieved 8 May 2021.
  153. ^ Provost, René; Akhavan, Payam, eds. (2010). Confronting Genocide. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 33. ISBN 978-9048198405.
  154. ^ Lösing, Felix (2020). A 'Crisis of Whiteness' in the 'Heart of Darkness'. Racism and the Congo Reform Movement. Bielefeld: transcript. p. 80. ISBN 978-3-8376-5498-1. OCLC 1182579739.
  155. ^ Suny 2015, p. 308.
  156. ^ Garibian, Sévane (10 February 2016). "Crime against Humanity". Mass Violence and Resistance - Research Network. Sciences Po.
  157. ^ Dadrian & Akçam 2011, p. 17.
  158. ^ Schabas, William (2000). Genocide in international law: the crimes of crimes. Cambridge University Press. p. 25. ISBN 9780521787901 – via Google Books. Lemkin's interest in the subject dates to his days as a student at Lvov University, when he intently followed attempts to prosecute the perpetration of the massacres of the Armenians.
  159. ^ de Waal 2015, pp. 132–133.
  160. ^ Ihrig 2016, pp. 9, 370–371.
  161. ^ Robin Coupland, Kobi-Renée Leins (2005-07-20). "Science and Prohibited Weapons – ICRC". Science Magazine. Retrieved 2022-08-01.
  162. ^ Haas, Rainer (1999-03-01). "Destruction of chemical weapons – Technologies and practical aspects". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 6 (1): 19. Bibcode:1999ESPR....6...19H. doi:10.1007/BF02987115. ISSN 1614-7499. PMID 19005858. S2CID 185978.
  163. ^ "Arms Control and Disarmament". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2022-08-01.
  164. ^ Chen, Alexandra (2022-01-19). "Chemical Weapons and their Unforeseen Impact on Health and the Environment". Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental & Innovation Law. 12 (1).

Bibliography

edit

Further reading

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=War_crimes_in_World_War_I&oldid=1261492208"