λProlog, also written lambda Prolog, is a logic programming language featuring polymorphic typing, modular programming, and higher-order programming. These extensions to Prolog are derived from the higher-order hereditary Harrop formulas used to justify the foundations of λProlog. Higher-order quantification, simply typed λ-terms, and higher-order unification gives λProlog the basic supports needed to capture the λ-tree syntax approach to higher-order abstract syntax, an approach to representing syntax that maps object-level bindings to programming language bindings. Programmers in λProlog need not deal with bound variable names: instead various declarative devices are available to deal with binder scopes and their instantiations.
Paradigm | Logic programming |
---|---|
Designed by | Dale Miller and Gopalan Nadathur |
First appeared | 1987[1] |
Typing discipline | strongly typed |
License | GNU General Public License v3 |
Website | www |
Major implementations | |
Teyjus, ELPI | |
Influenced by | |
Prolog | |
Influenced | |
Makam |
History
editSince 1986, λProlog has received numerous implementations. As of 2023, the language and its implementations are still actively being developed.
The Abella theorem prover has been designed to provide an interactive environment for proving theorems about the declarative core of λProlog.
Programming in λProlog
editTwo unique features of λProlog include implications and universal quantification. Implication in goals can be used to formulate hypothetical reasoning. The absence of universal quantification can be used to link goals and clauses:
reverse L K :-
(rev nil K &
pi H\ pi T\ pi S\ rev (H::T) S :- rev T (H::S)))
=> rev L nil.
?- reverse 1::2::3::nil L.
Success:
L = 3::2::1::nil
The same operational semantics allows formulating provability in the style of Curry-Howard-isomorphism. Here is an encoding of natural deduction inference rules:
pv (andI P1 P2) (and A B) :- pv P1 A, pv P2 B.
pv (impI P) (imp A B) :- pi p \ (pv p A) => (pv (P p) B).
pv (andE1 P) A :- pv P (and A B).
pv (andE2 P) B :- pv P (and A B).
pv (impE P1 P2) B :- pv P2 A, pv P1 (imp A B).
?- pi p q r \ pv (Pf p q r) (imp p (imp (and q r) (and (and p q) r))).
Success:
Pf = W1\ W2\ W3\ impI (W4\ impI (W5\ andI (andI W4 (andE1 W5)) (andE2 W5)))
See also
edit- Curry's paradox#Lambda calculus — about inconsistency problems caused by combining (propositional) logic and untyped lambda calculus
- Comparison of Prolog implementations
- Prolog syntax and semantics
References
edit- ^ "FAQ: What implementations of lambda Prolog are available?". www.lix.polytechnique.fr. Retrieved 2019-12-16.
Tutorials and texts
edit- Dale Miller and Gopalan Nadathur have written the book Programming with higher-order logic, published by Cambridge University Press in June 2012.
- Amy Felty has written in a 1997 tutorial on lambda Prolog and its Applications to Theorem Proving.
- John Hannan has written a tutorial on Program Analysis in lambda Prolog for the 1998 PLILP Conference.
- Olivier Ridoux has written Lambda-Prolog de A à Z... ou presque (163 pages, French). It is available as PostScript, PDF, and html.
External links
edit- λProlog homepage
- Entry at the Software Preservation Group.
Implementations
edit- The Teyjus λProlog compiler is currently the oldest implementation still being maintained.[1] This compiler project is led by Gopalan Nadathur and various of his colleagues and students.
- ELPI: an Embeddable λProlog Interpreter has been developed by Enrico Tassi and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen. It is implemented in OCaml and is available online. The system is described in a paper that appeared LPAR 2015. ELPI is also available as a Coq plugin: see Enrico Tassi's tutorial on this plugin.
- The Abella prover can be used to prove theorems about λProlog programs and specifications.
- ^ Nadathur, Gopalan; Dustin Mitchell (1999). System Description: Teyjus - A Compiler and Abstract Machine Based Implementation of lambda Prolog. LNAI. Vol. 1632. pp. 287–291. doi:10.1007/3-540-48660-7_25. ISBN 978-3-540-66222-8.
{{cite book}}
:|journal=
ignored (help)