The 1920 United States presidential election in Maryland took place on November 2, 1920, as part of the 1920 United States presidential election which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose eight representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With its history as a slave state and substantial historic secessionist support, Maryland had been strongly Democratic during the Third Party System despite having Federalist and Whig tendencies under previous systems.[1] However, hostility towards William Jennings Bryan’s free silver and Populist tendencies in the cities meant that the state shifted Republican in 1896[2] and became very close in subsequent elections during the “System of 1896”. Unlike former Confederate states and Oklahoma, Maryland did not succeed in disenfranchising its large black population despite several attempts,[3] which helped the Republicans remain highly competitive in early twentieth-century state elections.
Woodrow Wilson had carried Maryland by 4.84 percentage points more than his national margin in 1916, which made it his best state outside the former Confederacy or West. Democratic nominee and former Ohio Governor James M. Cox did not campaign in the state, but Republican nominee and Ohio Senator Warren G. Harding, fearing that Cox might add the machine-controlled states of the Northeast to his “Solid South”, did campaign in Maryland during September.[4] The first straw vote in mid-October showed Harding leading by around 300 votes out of 4,300,[5] although that had reversed in a poll a week later,[6] and at the end of October polls were divided with one giving the state to Cox[7] but another saying that it would be safe for Harding if black women could be mustered to vote.[8]
As it turned out, Harding carried the state comfortably: his margin was comparable to the other border states except Kentucky (where Cox was helped by Fayette County political boss Billy Kair[9]) but Maryland was still 13.22 points more Democratic than the nation at-large or an 8 percent bigger differential than in 1916.
Results
edit| Presidential Candidate | Running Mate | Party | Electoral Vote (EV) | Popular Vote (PV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren G. Harding of Ohio | Calvin Coolidge | Republican | 8[10] | 236,117 | 55.11% |
| James M. Cox | Franklin D. Roosevelt | Democratic | 0 | 180,626 | 42.16% |
| Eugene V. Debs | Seymour Stedman | Socialist | 0 | 8,876 | 2.07% |
| Parley P. Christensen | Max S. Hayes | Third Party | 0 | 1,645 | 0.38% |
| William Wesley Cox | August Gillhaus | Labor | 0 | 1,178 | 0.27% |
| Write-ins | — | — | 0 | 1 | 0.00% |
Results by county
edit| County | Warren Gamaliel Harding Republican |
James Middleton Cox Democratic |
Eugene Victor Debs Socialist |
Parley Parker Christensen Third Party |
William Wesley Cox Labor |
Margin | Total votes cast[11] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Allegany | 9,595 | 57.37% | 5,643 | 33.74% | 1,291 | 7.72% | 96 | 0.57% | 100 | 0.60% | 3,952 | 23.63% | 16,725 |
| Anne Arundel | 6,199 | 54.52% | 5,053 | 44.44% | 70 | 0.62% | 15 | 0.13% | 33 | 0.29% | 1,146 | 10.08% | 11,370 |
| Baltimore | 12,432 | 56.04% | 9,365 | 42.22% | 233 | 1.05% | 113 | 0.51% | 40 | 0.18% | 3,067 | 13.83% | 22,183 |
| Baltimore City | 125,526 | 57.02% | 86,748 | 39.40% | 6,272 | 2.85% | 1,091 | 0.50% | 509 | 0.23% | 38,778 | 17.61% | 220,146 |
| Calvert | 1,741 | 58.01% | 1,230 | 40.99% | 8 | 0.27% | 12 | 0.40% | 10 | 0.33% | 511 | 17.03% | 3,001 |
| Caroline | 2,929 | 48.90% | 3,012 | 50.28% | 29 | 0.48% | 17 | 0.28% | 3 | 0.05% | -83 | -1.39% | 5,990 |
| Carroll | 5,784 | 57.13% | 4,273 | 42.20% | 18 | 0.18% | 25 | 0.25% | 25 | 0.25% | 1,511 | 14.92% | 10,125 |
| Cecil | 3,435 | 49.37% | 3,468 | 49.85% | 7 | 0.10% | 26 | 0.37% | 21 | 0.30% | -33 | -0.47% | 6,957 |
| Charles | 2,585 | 60.54% | 1,642 | 38.45% | 12 | 0.28% | 2 | 0.05% | 29 | 0.68% | 943 | 22.08% | 4,270 |
| Dorchester | 4,218 | 51.38% | 3,950 | 48.11% | 15 | 0.18% | 6 | 0.07% | 21 | 0.26% | 268 | 3.26% | 8,210 |
| Frederick | 9,559 | 54.57% | 7,747 | 44.22% | 98 | 0.56% | 44 | 0.25% | 70 | 0.40% | 1,812 | 10.34% | 17,518 |
| Garrett | 2,805 | 70.25% | 1,070 | 26.80% | 91 | 2.28% | 6 | 0.15% | 21 | 0.53% | 1,735 | 43.45% | 3,993 |
| Harford | 4,175 | 49.86% | 4,134 | 49.37% | 36 | 0.43% | 13 | 0.16% | 16 | 0.19% | 41 | 0.49% | 8,374 |
| Howard | 2,608 | 51.46% | 2,397 | 47.30% | 23 | 0.45% | 13 | 0.26% | 27 | 0.53% | 211 | 4.16% | 5,068 |
| Kent | 2,838 | 48.22% | 3,034 | 51.55% | 2 | 0.03% | 4 | 0.07% | 8 | 0.14% | -196 | -3.33% | 5,886 |
| Montgomery | 5,948 | 47.96% | 6,277 | 50.61% | 76 | 0.61% | 50 | 0.40% | 51 | 0.41% | -329 | -2.65% | 12,402 |
| Prince George's | 6,628 | 56.83% | 4,857 | 41.64% | 110 | 0.94% | 45 | 0.39% | 23 | 0.20% | 1,771 | 15.18% | 11,663 |
| Queen Anne's | 2,157 | 37.43% | 3,519 | 61.07% | 38 | 0.66% | 29 | 0.50% | 19 | 0.33% | -1,362 | -23.64% | 5,762 |
| St. Mary's | 2,175 | 53.13% | 1,861 | 45.46% | 27 | 0.66% | 7 | 0.17% | 24 | 0.59% | 314 | 7.67% | 4,094 |
| Somerset | 3,658 | 57.57% | 2,634 | 41.45% | 16 | 0.25% | 3 | 0.05% | 43 | 0.68% | 1,024 | 16.12% | 6,354 |
| Talbot | 3,050 | 49.19% | 3,130 | 50.48% | 11 | 0.18% | 2 | 0.03% | 7 | 0.11% | -80 | -1.29% | 6,200 |
| Washington | 8,757 | 54.75% | 6,852 | 42.84% | 353 | 2.21% | 8 | 0.05% | 25 | 0.16% | 1,905 | 11.91% | 15,995 |
| Wicomico | 4,225 | 45.39% | 5,054 | 54.29% | 12 | 0.13% | 6 | 0.06% | 12 | 0.13% | -829 | -8.91% | 9,309 |
| Worcester | 3,090 | 45.13% | 3,676 | 53.69% | 28 | 0.41% | 12 | 0.18% | 41 | 0.60% | -586 | -8.56% | 6,847 |
| Totals | 236,117 | 55.11% | 180,626 | 42.16% | 8,876 | 2.07% | 1,645 | 0.38% | 1,178 | 0.27% | 55,491 | 12.95% | 428,442 |
Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican
editSee also
editReferences
edit- ^ Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 30, 130 ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6
- ^ Diamond, William; ‘Urban and Rural Voting in 1896’; The American Historical Review, vol. 46, no. 2 (January 1941), pp. 281-305
- ^ Shufelt, Gordeon H.; 'Jim Crow among strangers: The growth of Baltimore's Little Italy and Maryland's disfranchisement campaigns'; Journal of American Ethnic History; vol. 19, issue 4 (Summer 2000), pp. 49-78
- ^ Price, Harry N.; ‘Alter Harding Tour: Managers Abridge Western Trip; Arrange Tryout in East. Now Aim to Win Maryland’; The Washington Post, September 17, 1920, p. 1
- ^ ‘Shows Harding Leading: Nation-Wide Straw Vote Gives Him 371,461, Against 242,432 for Cox’; New York Times, October 10, 1920, p. 6
- ^ ‘Cox Gains Slightly in Big Straw Vote: But Harding Leads on Ballot with 495,961 Against 325,004 for Governor’; New York Times, October 17, 1920, p. 5
- ^ ‘Harding 363 Votes, Cox 168, Is Result Obtained From Estimates by 47 Editors: Maryland, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana, Utah and Arizona, With Solid South, Are Only States Conceded to Democratic Candidate in Nation-Wide Canvass’; Special to the Washington Post, October 31, 1920, p. 1
- ^ ‘Maryland Appears Safely Republican: Harding May Get Record Vote if Colored Women Can Master Ballot’; The Washington Post, October 31, 1920, p. 4
- ^ Bolin, Janes Duane; Bossism and Reform in a Southern City: Lexington, Kentucky, 1880-1940, pp. 82-83 ISBN 9780813121505
- ^ "1920 Presidential General Election Results – Maryland". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- ^ Maryland State Board of Elections; ‘Maryland Election Returns, 1920’; Maryland Manual (1921) pp. 133-137