2–3 tree

2–3 tree
2–3 tree
Type	tree
Invented	1970
Invented by	John Hopcroft
Complexities in big O notation
Space
Space complexity
Space
Time complexity
Function
Search
Insert
Delete

In computer science, a 2–3 tree is a tree data structure, where every node with children (internal node) has either two children (2-node) and one data element or three children (3-node) and two data elements. A 2–3 tree is a B-tree of order 3.^[1] Nodes on the outside of the tree (leaf nodes) have no children and one or two data elements.^[2]^[3] 2–3 trees were invented by John Hopcroft in 1970.^[4]

2–3 trees are required to be balanced, meaning that each leaf is at the same level. It follows that each right, center, and left subtree of a node contains the same or close to the same amount of data.

Definitions

We say that an internal node is a 2-node if it has one data element and two children.

We say that an internal node is a 3-node if it has two data elements and three children.

A 4-node, with three data elements, may be temporarily created during manipulation of the tree but is never persistently stored in the tree.

2 node
3 node

We say that $T$ is a 2–3 tree if and only if one of the following statements hold:^[5]

$T$ is empty. In other words, $T$ does not have any nodes.
T is a 2-node with data element a. If T has left child p and right child q, then
- $p$ and $q$ are 2–3 trees of the same height;
- $a$ is greater than each element in $p$ ; and
- $a$ is less than each data element in $q$ .
T is a 3-node with data elements a and b, where a < b. If T has left child p, middle child q, and right child r, then
- $p$ , $q$ , and $r$ are 2–3 trees of equal height;
- $a$ is greater than each data element in $p$ and less than each data element in $q$ ; and
- $b$ is greater than each data element in $q$ and less than each data element in $r$ .

Properties

Every internal node is a 2-node or a 3-node.
All leaves are at the same level.
All data is kept in sorted order.

Operations

Searching

Searching for an item in a 2–3 tree is similar to searching for an item in a binary search tree. Since the data elements in each node are ordered, a search function will be directed to the correct subtree and eventually to the correct node which contains the item.

Let $T$ be a 2–3 tree and $d$ be the data element we want to find. If $T$ is empty, then $d$ is not in $T$ and we're done.
Let $t$ be the root of $T$ .
Suppose t is a leaf.
- If $d$ is not in $t$ , then $d$ is not in $T$ . Otherwise, $d$ is in $T$ . We need no further steps and we're done.
Suppose t is a 2-node with left child p and right child q. Let a be the data element in t. There are three cases:
- If $d$ is equal to $a$ , then we've found $d$ in $T$ and we're done.
- If $d<a$ , then set $T$ to $p$ , which by definition is a 2–3 tree, and go back to step 2.
- If $d>a$ , then set $T$ to $q$ and go back to step 2.
Suppose t is a 3-node with left child p, middle child q, and right child r. Let a and b be the two data elements of t, where $a<b$ . There are four cases:
- If $d$ is equal to $a$ or $b$ , then $d$ is in $T$ and we're done.
- If $d<a$ , then set $T$ to $p$ and go back to step 2.
- If $a<d<b$ , then set $T$ to $q$ and go back to step 2.
- If $d>b$ , then set $T$ to $r$ and go back to step 2.

Insertion

Insertion maintains the balanced property of the tree.^[5]

To insert into a 2-node, the new key is added to the 2-node in the appropriate order.

To insert into a 3-node, more work may be required depending on the location of the 3-node. If the tree consists only of a 3-node, the node is split into three 2-nodes with the appropriate keys and children.

Insertion of a number in a 2–3 tree for 3 possible cases

If the target node is a 3-node whose parent is a 2-node, the key is inserted into the 3-node to create a temporary 4-node. In the illustration, the key 10 is inserted into the 2-node with 6 and 9. The middle key is 9, and is promoted to the parent 2-node. This leaves a 3-node of 6 and 10, which is split to be two 2-nodes held as children of the parent 3-node.

If the target node is a 3-node and the parent is a 3-node, a temporary 4-node is created then split as above. This process continues up the tree to the root. If the root must be split, then the process of a single 3-node is followed: a temporary 4-node root is split into three 2-nodes, one of which is considered to be the root. This operation grows the height of the tree by one.

Deletion

Deleting a key from a non-leaf node can be done by replacing it by its immediate predecessor or successor, and then deleting the predecessor or successor from a leaf node. Deleting a key from a leaf node is easy if the leaf is a 3-node. Otherwise, it may require creating a temporary 1-node which may be absorbed by reorganizing the tree, or it may repeatedly travel upwards before it can be absorbed, as a temporary 4-node may in the case of insertion. Alternatively, it's possible to use an algorithm which is both top-down and bottom-up, creating temporary 4-nodes on the way down that are then destroyed as you travel back up. Deletion methods are explained in more detail in the references.^[5]^[6]

Parallel operations

Since 2–3 trees are similar in structure to red–black trees, parallel algorithms for red–black trees can be applied to 2–3 trees as well.

References

^ Knuth, Donald M (1998). "6.2.4". The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 3 (2 ed.). Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-89685-5. The 2–3 trees defined at the close of Section 6.2.3 are equivalent to B-Trees of order 3.
^ R. Hernández; J. C. Lázaro; R. Dormido; S. Ros (2001). Estructura de Datos y Algoritmos. Prentice Hall. ISBN 84-205-2980-X.
^ Aho, Alfred V.; Hopcroft, John E.; Ullman, Jeffrey D. (1974). The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley., pp.145–147
^ Cormen, Thomas (2009). Introduction to Algorithms. London: The MIT Press. pp. 504. ISBN 978-0-262-03384-8.
^ ^a ^b ^c Sedgewick, Robert; Wayne, Kevin. "3.3". Algorithms (4 ed.). Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-57351-3.
^ "2-3 Trees", Lyn Turbak, handout #26, course notes, CS230 Data Structures, Wellesley College, December 2, 2004. Accessed Mar. 11, 2024.

[1] Knuth, Donald M (1998). "6.2.4". The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 3 (2 ed.). Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-89685-5. The 2–3 trees defined at the close of Section 6.2.3 are equivalent to B-Trees of order 3.

[2] R. Hernández; J. C. Lázaro; R. Dormido; S. Ros (2001). Estructura de Datos y Algoritmos. Prentice Hall. ISBN 84-205-2980-X.

[3] Aho, Alfred V.; Hopcroft, John E.; Ullman, Jeffrey D. (1974). The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley., pp.145–147

[4] Cormen, Thomas (2009). Introduction to Algorithms. London: The MIT Press. pp. 504. ISBN 978-0-262-03384-8.

[A4-5] Sedgewick, Robert; Wayne, Kevin. "3.3". Algorithms (4 ed.). Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0-321-57351-3.

[6] "2-3 Trees", Lyn Turbak, handout #26, course notes, CS230 Data Structures, Wellesley College, December 2, 2004. Accessed Mar. 11, 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]