Assignment valuation

In economics, assignment valuation is a kind of a utility function on sets of items. It was introduced by Shapley^[1] and further studied by Lehmann, Lehmann and Nisan,^[2] who use the term OXS valuation (not to be confused with XOS valuation). Fair item allocation in this setting was studied by Benabbou, Chakraborty, Elkind, Zick and Igarashi.^[3]^[4]

Assignment valuations correspond to preferences of groups. In each group, there are several individuals; each individual attributes a certain numeric value to each item. The assignment-valuation of the group to a set of items S is the value of the maximum weight matching of the items in S to the individuals in the group.

The assignment valuations are a subset of the submodular valuations.

Example

Suppose there are three items and two agents who value the items as follows:


	x	y	z
Alice:	5	3	1
George:	6	2	4.5

Then the assignment-valuation v corresponding to the group {Alice,George} assigns the following values:

$v(\{x\})=6$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns x to George.
$v(\{y\})=3$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns y to Alice.
$v(\{z\})=4.5$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns z to George.
$v(\{x,y\})=9$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns x to George and y to Alice.
$v(\{x,z\})=9.5$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns z to George and x to Alice.
$v(\{y,z\})=7.5$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns z to George and y to Alice.
$v(\{x,y,z\})=9.5$ - since the maximum-weight matching assigns z to George and x to Alice.

References

^ Shapley, Lloyd S. (1962). "Complements and substitutes in the opttmal assignment problem". Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 9 (1): 45–48. doi:10.1002/nav.3800090106.
^ Lehmann, Benny; Lehmann, Daniel; Nisan, Noam (2006-05-01). "Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities". Games and Economic Behavior. Mini Special Issue: Electronic Market Design. 55 (2): 270–296. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.02.006. ISSN 0899-8256.
^ Benabbou, Nawal; Chakraborty, Mithun; Elkind, Edith; Zick, Yair (2019-08-10). "Fairness Towards Groups of Agents in the Allocation of Indivisible Items". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ Benabbou, Nawal; Chakraborty, Mithun; Igarashi, Ayumi; Zick, Yair (2020). Finding Fair and Efficient Allocations When Valuations Don't Add Up. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 12283. pp. 32–46. arXiv:2003.07060. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57980-7_3. ISBN 978-3-030-57979-1. S2CID 208328700.

[1] Shapley, Lloyd S. (1962). "Complements and substitutes in the opttmal assignment problem". Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 9 (1): 45–48. doi:10.1002/nav.3800090106.

[2] Lehmann, Benny; Lehmann, Daniel; Nisan, Noam (2006-05-01). "Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities". Games and Economic Behavior. Mini Special Issue: Electronic Market Design. 55 (2): 270–296. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.02.006. ISSN 0899-8256.

[3] Benabbou, Nawal; Chakraborty, Mithun; Elkind, Edith; Zick, Yair (2019-08-10). "Fairness Towards Groups of Agents in the Allocation of Indivisible Items". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[4] Benabbou, Nawal; Chakraborty, Mithun; Igarashi, Ayumi; Zick, Yair (2020). Finding Fair and Efficient Allocations When Valuations Don't Add Up. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 12283. pp. 32–46. arXiv:2003.07060. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57980-7_3. ISBN 978-3-030-57979-1. S2CID 208328700.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]