Axiomatic foundations of topological spaces

In the mathematical field of topology, a topological space is usually defined by declaring its open sets.[1] However, this is not necessary, as there are many equivalent axiomatic foundations, each leading to exactly the same concept. For instance, a topological space determines a class of closed sets, of closure and interior operators, and of convergence of various types of objects. Each of these can instead be taken as the primary class of objects, with all of the others (including the class of open sets) directly determined from that new starting point. For example, in Kazimierz Kuratowski's well-known textbook on point-set topology, a topological space is defined as a set together with a certain type of "closure operator," and all other concepts are derived therefrom.[2] Likewise, the neighborhood-based axioms (in the context of Hausdorff spaces) can be retraced to Felix Hausdorff's original definition of a topological space in Grundzüge der Mengenlehre.[citation needed]

Many different textbooks use many different inter-dependences of concepts to develop point-set topology. The result is always the same collection of objects: open sets, closed sets, and so on. For many practical purposes, the question of which foundation is chosen is irrelevant, as long as the meaning and interrelation between objects (many of which are given in this article), which are the same regardless of choice of development, are understood. However, there are cases where it can be useful to have flexibility. For instance, there are various natural notions of convergence of measures, and it is not immediately clear whether they arise from a topological structure or not. Such questions are greatly clarified by the topological axioms based on convergence.

Standard definitions via open sets

edit

A topological space is a set   together with a collection   of subsets of   satisfying:[3]

  • The empty set and   are in  
  • The union of any collection of sets in   is also in  
  • The intersection of any pair of sets in   is also in   Equivalently, the intersection of any finite collection of sets in   is also in  

Given a topological space   one refers to the elements of   as the open sets of   and it is common only to refer to   in this way, or by the label topology. Then one makes the following secondary definitions:

  • Given a second topological space   a function   is said to be continuous if and only if for every open subset   of   one has that   is an open subset of  [4]
  • A subset   of   is closed if and only if its complement   is open.[5]
  • Given a subset   of   the closure is the set of all points such that any open set containing such a point must intersect  [6]
  • Given a subset   of   the interior is the union of all open sets contained in  [7]
  • Given an element   of   one says that a subset   is a neighborhood of   if and only if   is contained in an open subset of   which is also a subset of  [8] Some textbooks use "neighborhood of  " to instead refer to an open set containing  [9]
  • One says that a net converges to a point   of   if for any open set   containing   the net is eventually contained in  [10]
  • Given a set   a filter is a collection of nonempty subsets of   that is closed under finite intersection and under supersets.[11] Some textbooks allow a filter to contain the empty set, and reserve the name "proper filter" for the case in which it is excluded.[12] A topology on   defines a notion of a filter converging to a point   of   by requiring that any open set   containing   is an element of the filter.[13]
  • Given a set   a filterbase is a collection of nonempty subsets such that every two subsets intersect nontrivially and contain a third subset in the intersection.[14] Given a topology on   one says that a filterbase converges to a point   if every neighborhood of   contains some element of the filterbase.[15]

Definition via closed sets

edit

Let   be a topological space. According to De Morgan's laws, the collection   of closed sets satisfies the following properties:[16]

  • The empty set and   are elements of  
  • The intersection of any collection of sets in   is also in  
  • The union of any pair of sets in   is also in  

Now suppose that   is only a set. Given any collection   of subsets of   which satisfy the above axioms, the corresponding set   is a topology on   and it is the only topology on   for which   is the corresponding collection of closed sets.[17] This is to say that a topology can be defined by declaring the closed sets. As such, one can rephrase all definitions to be in terms of closed sets:

  • Given a second topological space   a function   is continuous if and only if for every closed subset   of   the set   is closed as a subset of  [18]
  • a subset   of   is open if and only if its complement   is closed.[19]
  • given a subset   of   the closure is the intersection of all closed sets containing  [20]
  • given a subset   of   the interior is the complement of the intersection of all closed sets containing  

Definition via closure operators

edit

Given a topological space   the closure can be considered as a map   where   denotes the power set of   One has the following Kuratowski closure axioms:[21]

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

If   is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of cl satisfies the previous axioms for closed sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated closure operator coincides with the given cl.[22] As before, it follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of the closure operator:

  • Given a second topological space   a function   is continuous if and only if for every subset   of   one has that the set   is a subset of  [23]
  • A subset   of   is open if and only if  [24]
  • A subset   of   is closed if and only if  [25]
  • Given a subset   of   the interior is the complement of  [26]

Definition via interior operators

edit

Given a topological space   the interior can be considered as a map   where   denotes the power set of   It satisfies the following conditions:[27]

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

If   is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then the set of all possible outputs of int satisfies the previous axioms for open sets, and hence defines a topology; it is the unique topology whose associated interior operator coincides with the given int.[28] It follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of the interior operator, for instance:

  • Given topological spaces   and   a function   is continuous if and only if for every subset   of   one has that the set   is a subset of  [29]
  • A set is open if and only if it equals its interior.[30]
  • The closure of a set is the complement of the interior of its complement.[31]

Definition via exterior operators

edit

Given a topological space   the exterior can be considered as a map   where   denotes the power set of   It satisfies the following conditions:[32]

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

If   is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then we can define the interior operator and vice versa. More precisely, if we define  ,   satisfies the interior operator axioms, and hence defines a topology.[33] Conversely, if we define  ,   satisfies the above axioms. Moreover, these correspondence is 1-1. It follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of the exterior operator, for instance:

  • The closure of a set is the complement of its exterior,  .
  • Given a second topological space   a function   is continuous if and only if for every subset   of   one has that the set   is a subset of   Equivalently,   is continuous if and only if for every subset   of   one has that the set   is a subset of  
  • A set is open if and only if it equals the exterior of its complement.
  • A set is closed if and only if it equals the complement of its exterior.

Definition via boundary operators

edit

Given a topological space   the boundary can be considered as a map   where   denotes the power set of   It satisfies the following conditions:[32]

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

If   is a set equipped with a mapping satisfying the above properties, then we can define closure operator and vice versa. More precisely, if we define  ,   satisfies closure axioms, and hence boundary operation defines a topology. Conversely, if we define  ,   satisfies above axioms. Moreover, these correspondence is 1-1. It follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of the boundary operator, for instance:

  •  
  • A set is open if and only if  .
  • A set is closed if and only if  .

Definition via derived sets

edit

The derived set of a subset   of a topological space   is the set of all points   that are limit points of   that is, points   such that every neighbourhood of   contains a point of   other than   itself. The derived set of  , denoted  , satisfies the following conditions:[32]

  •  
  • For all  
  •  
  •  

Since a set   is closed if and only if  ,[34] the derived set uniquely defines a topology. It follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of derived sets, for instance:

  •  .
  • Given topological spaces   and   a function   is continuous if and only if for every subset   of   one has that the set   is a subset of  .[35]

Definition via neighbourhoods

edit

Recall that this article follows the convention that a neighborhood is not necessarily open. In a topological space, one has the following facts:[36]

  • If   is a neighborhood of   then   is an element of  
  • The intersection of two neighborhoods of   is a neighborhood of   Equivalently, the intersection of finitely many neighborhoods of   is a neighborhood of  
  • If   contains a neighborhood of   then   is a neighborhood of  
  • If   is a neighborhood of   then there exists a neighborhood   of   such that   is a neighborhood of each point of  .

If   is a set and one declares a nonempty collection of neighborhoods for every point of   satisfying the above conditions, then a topology is defined by declaring a set to be open if and only if it is a neighborhood of each of its points; it is the unique topology whose associated system of neighborhoods is as given.[36] It follows that on a topological space   all definitions can be phrased in terms of neighborhoods:

  • Given another topological space   a map   is continuous if and only for every element   of   and every neighborhood   of   the preimage   is a neighborhood of  [37]
  • A subset of   is open if and only if it is a neighborhood of each of its points.
  • Given a subset   of   the interior is the collection of all elements   of   such that   is a neighbourhood of  .
  • Given a subset   of   the closure is the collection of all elements   of   such that every neighborhood of   intersects  [38]

Definition via convergence of nets

edit

Convergence of nets satisfies the following properties:[39][40]

  1. Every constant net converges to itself.
  2. Every subnet of a convergent net converges to the same limits.
  3. If a net does not converge to a point   then there is a subnet such that no further subnet converges to   Equivalently, if   is a net such that every one of its subnets has a sub-subnet that converges to a point   then   converges to  
  4. Diagonal principle/Convergence of iterated limits. If   in   and for every index     is a net that converges to   in   then there exists a diagonal (sub)net of   that converges to  
    • A diagonal net refers to any subnet of  
    • The notation   denotes the net defined by   whose domain is the set   ordered lexicographically first by   and then by  [40] explicitly, given any two pairs   declare that   holds if and only if both (1)   and also (2) if   then  

If   is a set, then given a notion of net convergence (telling what nets converge to what points[40]) satisfying the above four axioms, a closure operator on   is defined by sending any given set   to the set of all limits of all nets valued in   the corresponding topology is the unique topology inducing the given convergences of nets to points.[39]

Given a subset   of a topological space  

  •   is open in   if and only if every net converging to an element of   is eventually contained in  
  • the closure of   in   is the set of all limits of all convergent nets valued in  [41][40]
  •   is closed in   if and only if there does not exist a net in   that converges to an element of the complement  [42] A subset   is closed in   if and only if every limit point of every convergent net in   necessarily belongs to  [43]

A function   between two topological spaces is continuous if and only if for every   and every net   in   that converges to   in   the net  [note 1] converges to   in  [44]

Definition via convergence of filters

edit

A topology can also be defined on a set by declaring which filters converge to which points.[citation needed] One has the following characterizations of standard objects in terms of filters and prefilters (also known as filterbases):

  • Given a second topological space   a function   is continuous if and only if it preserves convergence of prefilters.[45]
  • A subset   of   is open if and only if every filter converging to an element of   contains  [46]
  • A subset   of   is closed if and only if there does not exist a prefilter on   which converges to a point in the complement  [47]
  • Given a subset   of   the closure consists of all points   for which there is a prefilter on   converging to  [48]
  • A subset   of   is a neighborhood of   if and only if it is an element of every filter converging to  [46]

See also

edit

Citations

edit
  1. ^ Dugundji 1966; Engelking 1977; Kelley 1955.
  2. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.38.
  3. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.62; Engelking 1977, p.11-12; Kelley 1955, p.37; Kuratowski 1966, p.45.
  4. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.79; Engelking 1977, p.27-28; Kelley 1955, p.85; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  5. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.68; Engelking 1977, p.13; Kelley 1955, p.40.
  6. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Engelking 1977, p.13.
  7. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Engelking 1977, p.14; Kelley 1955, p.44; Kuratowski 1966, p.58.
  8. ^ Kelley 1955, p.38; Kuratowski 1966, p.61.
  9. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.63; Engelking 1977, p.12.
  10. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.210; Engelking 1977, p.49; Kelley 1955, p.66; Kuratowski 1966, p.203.
  11. ^ Engelking 1977, p.52; Kelley 1955, p.83.
  12. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.6.
  13. ^ Engelking 1977, p.52; Kelley 1955, p.83; Kuratowski 1966, p.63.
  14. ^ Dugundji 1966, 211; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  15. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.212; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  16. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Engelking 1977, p.13; Kelley 1955, p.40; Kuratowski 1966, p.44.
  17. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.74; Engelking 1977, p.22; Kelley 1955, p.40; Kuratowski 1966, p.44.
  18. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.79; Engelking 1977, p.28; Kelley 1955, p.86; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  19. ^ Kelley 1955, p.41.
  20. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.70; Engelking 1977; Kelley 1955, p.42.
  21. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69-70; Engelking 1977, p.14; Kelley 1955, p.42-43.
  22. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.73; Engelking 1977, p.22; Kelley 1955, p.43.
  23. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.80; Engelking 1977, p.28; Kelley 1955, p.86; Kuratowski 1966, p.105.
  24. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.43.
  25. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.69; Kelley 1955, p.42; Kuratowski 1966, p.43.
  26. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Engelking 1977, p.15; Kelley 1955, p.44-45; Kuratowski 1966, p.55.
  27. ^ Engelking 1977, p.15.
  28. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.74; Engelking 1977, p.23.
  29. ^ Engelking 1977, p.28; Kuratowski 1966, p.103.
  30. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.71; Kelley 1955, p.44.
  31. ^ Kelley 1955, p.44-45.
  32. ^ a b c Lei, Yinbin; Zhang, Jun (August 2019). "Generalizing Topological Set Operators". Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science. 345: 63–76. doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.016. ISSN 1571-0661.
  33. ^ Bourbaki, Nicolas (1998). Elements of mathematics. Chapters 1/4: 3. General topology Chapters 1 - 4 (Softcover ed., [Nachdr.] - [1998] ed.). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-64241-1.
  34. ^ Baker, Crump W. (1991). Introduction to topology. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers. ISBN 978-0-697-05972-7.
  35. ^ Hocking, John G.; Young, Gail S. (1988). Topology. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-65676-2.
  36. ^ a b Willard 2004, pp. 31–32.
  37. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.103.
  38. ^ Kuratowski 1966, p.61.
  39. ^ a b Kelley 1955, p.74.
  40. ^ a b c d Willard 2004, p. 77.
  41. ^ Engelking 1977, p.50; Kelley 1955, p.66.
  42. ^ Engelking 1977, p.51; Kelley 1955, p.66.
  43. ^ Willard 2004, pp. 73–77.
  44. ^ Engelking 1977, p.51; Kelley 1955, p.86.
  45. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.216; Engelking 1977, p.52.
  46. ^ a b Kelley 1955, p.83.
  47. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.215.
  48. ^ Dugundji 1966, p.215; Engelking 1977, p.52.

Notes

  1. ^ Assuming that the net   is indexed by   (so that   which is just notation for function   that sends  ) then   denotes the composition of   with   That is,   is the function  

References

edit
  • Dugundji, James (1978). Topology. Allyn and Bacon Series in Advanced Mathematics (Reprinting of the 1966 original ed.). Boston, Mass.–London–Sydney: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  • Engelking, Ryszard (1977). General topology. Monografie Matematyczne. Vol. 60 (Translated by author from Polish ed.). Warsaw: PWN—Polish Scientific Publishers.
  • Kelley, John L. (1975). General topology. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 27 (Reprint of the 1955 ed.). New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kuratowski, K. (1966). Topology. Vol. I. (Translated from the French by J. Jaworowski. Revised and augmented ed.). New York-London/Warsaw: Academic Press/Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Willard, Stephen (2004) [1970]. General Topology. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-43479-7. OCLC 115240.