Blackmer v. United States

Blackmer v. United States, 284 U.S. 421 (1932), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.[1]

Blackmer v. United States
Argued January 5, 1932
Decided February 15, 1932
Full case nameBlackmer v. United States
Citations284 U.S. 421 (more)
52 S. Ct. 252; 76 L. Ed. 375; 1932 U.S. LEXIS 882
Holding
International law recognized a state's right to retain jurisdiction over its citizens abroad. Fines against Blackmer upheld.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts
Case opinion
MajorityHughes
Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Harry M. Blackmer was a United States citizen resident in Paris. Blackmer was found guilty of contempt by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia for refusing to appear as a witness for the United States in a criminal trial, which was related to the Teapot Dome Scandal, after being subpoenaed.

Blackmer was subsequently fined $30,000 and the costs of the court. Blackmer challenged the fine under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The Court unanimously ruled against Blackmer, with Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes delivering the judgment and opinion of the Court and Justice Owen Josephus Roberts not participating.

Chief Justice Hughes, in delivering the opinion of the Court, stated "[n]or can it be doubted that the United States possesses the power inherent in sovereignty to require the return to this country of a citizen, resident elsewhere, whenever the public interest requires it, and to penalize him in case of refusal." Also, "[i]t is also beyond controversy that one of the duties which the citizen owes to his government is to support the administration of justice by attending its courts and giving his testimony whenever he is properly summoned."

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Dickinson, Edwin D. (1932). "The Blackmer Case". American Journal of International Law. 26 (2): 351–353. doi:10.2307/2189359. ISSN 0002-9300.

Further reading

edit
edit