Wikipedia

Boßler Tunnel

The Boßler Tunnel is a railway tunnel currently under construction as part of the new Wendlingen–Ulm high-speed railway. The tunnel is approximately 8,806 metres (28,891 ft) long, built as two parallel single-track tunnels.[1][2] The tunnel runs between Aichelberg and Mühlhausen im Täle under the Roter Wasen and the Boßler mountain. It is one of a series of tunnels underneath the Swabian Jura range. When completed, it will be the longest tunnel on the line and the fifth longest tunnel in Germany (after the Landrücken Tunnel, the Münden Tunnel, the Filder Tunnel and the Katzenberg Tunnel).

Boßler Tunnel
Boßler Tunnel
Overview
Official nameBoßlertunnel
LineWendlingen–Ulm high-speed railway
Coordinates48°36′05″N 9°36′16″E / 48.6015°N 9.6044°E / 48.6015; 9.6044
Statusunder construction
Operation
Work begun2013
OpensDecember 2022
OwnerDeutsche Bahn
Traffichigh speed passenger trains
Technical
Length8,806 m (28,891 ft)
No. of tracks2 single track tunnels
Grade2.5% (1 in 40)

Route

edit
 
Geological cross-section of the Boßler tunnel and neighbouring tunnels
 
South-east portal under construction near Mühlhausen

The north-west portal (portal Aichelberg, track location marker 39.720 km, 48°37′50″N 9°33′50″E / 48.6305°N 9.5640°E / 48.6305; 9.5640 (NW portal)), situated northeast of Weilheim an der Teck, is the border of one of the line's planning sections. The line approaches this portal from the west, parallel to the A8 motorway.

The tunnel runs in a straight line towards the southeast, passing under the Roter Wasen and the Boßler.[3][4] The tunnel climbs about 213 metres (699 ft) to the southeast portal, with a gradient of about 25% (1 in 40).[1] The maximum overburden depth is 280 metres (920 ft).

The south-east portal (portal Buch im Filstal, 48.076 km, 48°34′21″N 9°38′42″E / 48.5724°N 9.6449°E / 48.5724; 9.6449 (SE portal)) is situated between Mühlhausen im Täle and Wiesensteig.[5] The line exits the portal onto the 485-metre (1,591.2 ft) Fils Viaduct across the A8.

History

edit

Deciding between alternative routes

edit

The tunnel is part of the Albaufstieg section of the line (track section 2.2), which involves an ascent of the Swabian Jura (also known in German as the Alb). 25 alternative routes were initially considered for this section.[1][6] A plan drawn up in 1993 included an 8-kilometre (5.0-mile) tunnel.[7] A later, 1995 plan included an 8,710-metre (28,580 ft) tunnel.[8][9] Many alternative routes were considered for the Aichelberg to Widderstall corridor. As well as routes involving a combined rail and motorway tunnel and a direct route, local variations of the route in the Neidlingen, Wiesensteig and Westerheim districts were also considered.[10]

The spatial planning provisions required to consider possible alternative routes for the Albaufstieg. Eight different routes were examined in detail. In 1999 a hydrological evaluation of these variants was conducted. After a planning stop in 2000, a new integrated assessment was carried out in 2006 in the context of paths for combined traffic routes.[11] In the middle of 1991 an early road design proposed the beginning of the tunnel already in Weilheim an der Teck.[12] while a length of 9 km was allotted for this part of Albaufstieg.[8] According to the planning status of 1993, an 8.8 km long tunnel was provided in this area.[8]

As of 2004 [4] and 2007, the planned length was 8710 m. Plans of 2007 envisaged the building of an exploratory tunnel within the cross-section of the later final tunnel due to the prevalent geological conditions.[13]

In mid-August 2009, the consultation process for the 14.5 km long zoning section Albaufstieg to which the tunnel belongs, was completed by the regional council of Stuttgart and handed over to the Federal Railway Authority for final approval. In the process leading to approval, 82 public agencies were consulted, and 1150 private reservations were handled. The principal resulting changes affected the site logistics.[14] In mid-2009, construction work was scheduled to start in 2010.[14]

Dispute on use of tunnel boring machines

edit

Due to the unstable rock,[15] planning decisions initially ruled out the use of tunnel boring machines.[6] However, according to entrepreneur Martin Herrenknecht their use could save 70 to 100 million euros over the originally tendered conventional method[16] The company obtained expert opinion at their own cost, and thus achieved the approval of mechanical tunneling. Together with the excavation of Filder tunnel, 80 to 100 million euros could thus been saved.[17] A 2830 m long section was advanced using tunnel boring machines (TBM) in both tubes. Although Deutsche Bahn had stipulated conventional shotcrete tunneling in the tender documents, alternative proposals for TBM excavation were welcomed. This proved an economic solution.[5]

Award of contract

edit

On 8 November 2011, the tunnel shell of Boßler- and Steinbühltunnel was put out for tender in Europe. The Boßlertunnel construction was subdivided into two lots of approximately 3670 m and approximately 5100 m in length; the Steinbühltunnel forms a third, independent lot. The contract also involved around 1.32 million cubic meters of excavated material or to be used during the project or disposed of, and the construction of four temporary connection points on the Autobahn 8[18]

The calculation documents were sent to bidders in February 2012.[19] The contract was awarded in October 2012, together with the Steinbühltunnel construct. The cost for both tunnels came to 635 million euros, believed to be significantly below the planned cost [20] Originally, the award was not expected to be made until the end of 2010 (Status: December 2011).[21] The award was officially published at the end of November 2012.[26] The total cost for both the tunnel Albaufstiegs specified end of October 2013, about 1.05 billion euros.[22] For the full planning approval section 2.4, the price was estimated at EUR 1,074.3 million.[23] When the financing agreement for the new line was concluded in April 2009, the Boßler Tunnel was estimated to have shell costs of around EUR 19.5 million per kilometer and tube. When applying for the financial construction permit in 2010, the planned cost was EUR 32.0 million per kilometer and tube.[24]

Construction

edit
 
Building site April 2016

The clearing work for the construction side began in early December 2012. In 2013, an embankment was added between the existing bridge over the L1214 road and the future tunnel portal.[25] The bridge was completed the first building of the new line in 2011 [26] In early 2012, following the Site survey the advance was scheduled for mid-2013 [27] The excavation at 'intermediate attack Umpfental' 'began in July 2013.[28] 66 months are provided for the shell.[5] The two tubes should be first built using the NATM. To accelerate the construction, three intermediate points were provided.[1] As part of a plan amendment process in 2008 an intermediate advance was rejected.[29] The planning of 2009 envisaged another intermediate advance in the form of a preliminary window tunnel, to be filled in after completion of the tunneling.[3] The machine advance from the western portal was over a length of 2830 m. An advance from the eastern portal was not undertaken, due to the very steep flanks and environmental considerations.[5] By mid-November 2014, 600 meters of intermediate advance had been completed.[30]

Of the 8,772 m long west tube, 8,745 m are being advanced in traditional drill & blast methods; portal structures are planned for the remaining 27 m. Of the 8,788 m long east tunnel, 8,761 m are being advanced using traditional drill & blast methods and 27. m using cut and cover for the portals.[18] Together with the Steinbühltunnel, a total of 4.3 million cubic meters of material will be excavated.[27] The machine advance should, according to the planning status of the end of 2013, begin not later than 21 September 2014.[well, did it?][31]

Approximately 8,000 people attended a Construction Site Open Day on 8 November 2014. Machine advance began symbolically. The actual machine advance was scheduled to begin in January 2015.[32]

After the overburden proved more solid than initially planned, in 2014, an extended machine advance was considered. Could machine advance be used? [33] Spätestens am 8. Dezember 2014 wurde der konventionelle Vortrieb ohne Angabe von Gründen gestoppt. Dabei waren bergabwärts 731 m und bergaufwärts bei 47 m.[34] It was downhill 731 m and uphill at 47 m [35] The according to other sources for before Christmas in 2014 [35] announced propelling start was delayed, according to web information indefinitely due to necessary fine adjustments to the machine [36]

At the end of February 2015, the Federal Railway announced its intention to extend the machine advance[37] In early March 2015, talks were held between German railway and contractors on the extension of mechanical tunneling [38] Due in part to lack of permits, the start of driving was delayed four months in total[38]

The machine advance finally began on 14 April 2015.[39] The 120 meter long, 11.38. m high [30] machine, worth 29 million euros, is called S 833 and was given the name Kätchen. It was planned advance by 15 to 20 meters per day. The machine advance would take eight to nine months in the first tunnel tube.[30] After one kilometer of machines advance, very dry rock dust was unexpectedly encountered.[26] Instead of the planned 20 meters per day, the machine advanced achieved as much as 30 meters. In July and August 2015, the advance was paused for five weeks in order to convert the logistics for a higher driving speed. On 5 August 2015 the advance was resumed [40] early September 2015 were with the machine 1.6 propelled km [41]

The segments for the outer skin of the tunnel were made in a segment plant in Weilheim,[39] seven days a week, in two shifts per day with 100 workers each.[39][28] They are transported the 1.6 km to the tunnel portal with a Feldbahn.[39]

On 6 November 2016 the machine finished the first tunnel.[42] The structural work was done from 2013–2018.[43] The tunnel is scheduled for completion in November 2019.[40]

Geology

edit

For about six kilometres, the tunnel passes beneath Middle Jurassic layers.[4] Preliminary investigations had shown very low strength in some sections, thus unstable rock is expected in connection with an overburden of up to 280 m.[13][44] Furthermore, Karst formations are expected in the White Jurassic layers.[13][44] The Middle Jurassic layers consist of claystone and argillaceous marl with sandstone inclusions. From top to bottom, the layers α, β (unstable rock), and γ - ξ are traversed, followed by White Jurassic α, β, and γ. The water pressure in the Middle Jurassic layers is expected to reach 4 bar (400 kPa), in the White Jurassic up to 10 bar (1,000 kPa).[45]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d Peter Marquart (2007). "Stuttgart 21 – und NBS Wendlingen-Ulm. Planungsstand und Ausblick" (PDF). Tiefbau. 119 (4): 190–196. ISSN 0944-8780. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-07-11.
  2. ^ Bahnprojekt Stuttgart Ulm: MotionRide (…). Video about the planned railway line, February 2010, Position 2:09.
  3. ^ a b Hany Azer, B. Engel: Stuttgart 21 und NBS Wendlingen–Ulm. In: Tunnel, Heft 7/2009, ISSN 0722-6241, S. 12–24 (PDF, 290 kB).
  4. ^ a b c Peter Marquart: Die Geologie weist ihren Weg – Tunnelbau in den Gebirgsformationen rund um Stuttgart und auf der Schwäbischen Alb. In: geotechnik, 27 (2004), Nr. 2, S. 99–103, ISSN 0172-6145.
  5. ^ a b c d Breidenstein, Matthias; Kielbassa, Stefan; Ludwig, Herwig (2013). Ein Überblick über die Tunnel der Neubaustrecke Wendlingen–Ulm (in German). Gütersloh: Bauverlag BV.
  6. ^ a b Planfeststellungsbeschluss gemäß § 18 Allgemeines Eisenbahngesetz (AEG) für die Aus- und Neubaustrecke Stuttgart – Augsburg Bereich Wendlingen – Ulm Planfeststellungsabschnitt 2.2, Albaufstieg km 39,270 – km 53,834 Archived 2016-06-29 at the Wayback Machine (PDF; 1.3 MB). Stuttgart, 20. September 2011, S. 68, 78.
  7. ^ Anonymous: Geplante Tunnel im Zuge der Neubaustrecke Stuttgart–Ulm. In: Tunnel, Volume 5/1993, ISSN 0722-6241, S. 288–292.
  8. ^ a b c Bienstock, Rudolf; Wittke, Walter (1992) [1991]. "Geotechnische Probleme beim Bau von Tunneln in Wasserschutzgebieten für die Neubaustrecke Stuttgart–Ulm". In Studiengesellschaft für unterirdische Verkehrsanlagen (Hrsg.) (ed.). Tunnelbau – Neue Chancen aus europäischen Impulsen. Forschung+Praxis U-Verkehr und unterirdisches Bauen. Vol. 34. Düsseldorf: Tagungsband der STUVA-Tagung. pp. 145–152. ISBN 3-87094-633-4.
  9. ^ Deutsche Bahn AG, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart (Hrsg.): Ausbau- und Neubaustrecke Stuttgart–Augsburg. Abschnitt Stuttgart–Ulm. Bereich: Wendlingen–Ulm. 1. Ausgabe August 1995, Planungsstand von August 1995.
  10. ^ Peter Marquart: Die Entwicklung des Projektplanung. In: Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart (Hrsg.): Projekt Stuttgart 21 und NBS Wendlingen – Ulm: Die Berücksichtigung der Wasserwirtschaft in der Planung – eine Zwischenbilanz. Tagungsband, 26. September 2006, (PDF[permanent dead link], 8 MB), S. 6–13.
  11. ^ Helmut Kobus: Die Entwicklung wasserwirtschaftlicher Probleme im Planungsprozess. In: Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart (Hrsg.):Projekt Stuttgart 21 und NBS Wendlingen – Ulm: Die Berücksichtigung der Wasserwirtschaft in der Planung – eine Zwischenbilanz. Tagungsband, 26. September 2006, (PDF Archived 2011-12-17 at the Wayback Machine, 8 MB), S. 14–27.
  12. ^ Deutsche Bundesbahn, Projektgruppe NBS der Bahnbauzentrale (Hrsg.): Information Ausbau- und Neubaustrecke Stuttgart – Augsburg. Zwölfseitiges Leporello, Stuttgart, Juni 1991.
  13. ^ a b c Wolfgang Feldwisch: Großprojekte der Bahn als Herausforderung für den Tunnelbau. In: Geotechnik, 30 (2007), Nr. 4, ISSN 0172-6145, S. 217–225.
  14. ^ a b Der neue ICE-Trassenabschnitt "Albaufstieg" wird ab 2010 gebaut. In: Der Teckbote (Onlineausgabe), 22. August 2009.
  15. ^ German original: "druckhaftes Gestein", proposed translation as "squeezing or swelling rock", roughly equivalent to the designation "very poor rock" in the RMR geomechanic system (Arild Palmström, The New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM), Conf. on Fjellsprengningsteknikk, Bergmekanikk, Geoteknikk, Oslo 1993, pp. 31.1 – 31.20)
  16. ^ Konstantin Schwarz: Herrenknecht greift die Bahn-Planer an. In: Stuttgarter Nachrichten, Nr. 185, 11. August 2012, S. 22 (online).
  17. ^ Martin-Werner Buchenau: Die Bahn ist immer noch wie eine Behörde. In: Handelsblatt. Nr. 241, 12. Dezember 2012, ISSN 0017-7296, S. 18.
  18. ^ a b D-Frankfurt: Bauarbeiten für Tunnel. Dokument 2011/S 214-349672 vom 8. November 2011 im Elektronischen Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union.
  19. ^ Volker Kefer: Stuttgart 21 und NBS Wendlingen-Ulm Unterlage für den Prüfungs- und Complianceausschuss (PCA) der DB und den Lenkungskreis (LK) S21. Berlin/Stuttgart, 23. März 2012 PDF[permanent dead link], (880 kB), S. 28.
  20. ^ Bahn vergibt auf der Neubaustrecke Wendlingen–Ulm die Tunnelbauwerke des Albaufstieges (PDF; 139 kB). Presseinformation der Deutschen Bahn vom 17. Oktober 2012.
  21. ^ Kommunikationsbüro Bahnprojekt Stuttgart–Ulm (Hrsg.): Steckbrief: Zum weiteren Projektfortschritt im Nachgang zur Volksabstimmung [dead link]. Presseinformation vom 2. Dezember 2011.
  22. ^ "Licht am Ende des Tunnels (Mit Video)", Schwäbische Zeitung (in German), p. 3, 31 October 2013
  23. ^ Deutscher Bundestag, ed. (25 July 2014), "Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Matthias Gastel, Harald Ebner, Christian Kühn (Tübingen), weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN – Drucksache 18/2123 – Sachstand Neubaustrecke Wendlingen–Ulm" (PDF), Jahresbericht ... Des Nationalen Normenkontrollrates (in German), 18 (2239), Berlin: 8, ISSN 0722-8333
  24. ^ Deutscher Bundestag (Hrsg.): Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Winfried Hermann, Dr. Anton Hofreiter, Dr. Valerie Wilms, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN – Drucksache 17/4001 – Aktuelle Entwicklungen bei der geplanten Neubaustrecke Wendlingen–Ulm (PDF; 107 kB). Drucksache 17/4293 vom 17. Dezember 2010.
  25. ^ Arnd Woletz: Vorboten der Mammut-Baustelle. In: Neue Württembergische Zeitung, 8. Dezember 2012 (online[permanent dead link]).
  26. ^ a b Philipp Langefeld, Gerald Lindner, Stefan Penn (2012), "Die Neubaustrecke Wendlingen – Ulm, ein Projekt am Übergang von der Planungs- zur Bauphase", Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau (in German), no. 12, pp. 16–20, ISSN 0013-2845{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ a b Andreas Pflüger: Mitte 2013 beginnt das große Bohren und Buddeln. In: Stuttgarter Zeitung, Nr. 24, 30. Januar 2012.
  28. ^ a b Corinna Meinke (15 June 2015), "Flott frisst sich Käthchen voran", Stuttgarter Zeitung (in German), no. 134, p. 18
  29. ^ Beim Lärmschutz bleibt die Bahn unbeweglich.[dead link] In: Göppinger Kreisnachrichten, 14. November 2008.
  30. ^ a b c "Symbolischer Baustart am Boßlertunnel", Südwest Presse (in German), p. 13, 11 October 2014
  31. ^ Jürgen Schäfer (23 November 2013), "Tunnelbaustelle reift heran", Geislinger Zeitung (in German), p. 12
  32. ^ "2500 Tonnen-Bohrer frisst sich ins Gestein", Schwäbische Zeitung, Ausgabe Alb-Donau (in German), p. 21, 11 November 2014
  33. ^ "Linke Tasche? Rechte Tasche!", Südwest Presse (in German), p. 7, 25 October 2014
  34. ^ "Bahn stoppt Sprengungen im Boßlertunnel", Geislinger Zeitung (in German), p. 9, 26 February 2015
  35. ^ a b Heike Allmendinger (28 February 2015), "Die Arbeiter stehen in den Startlöchern", Esslinger Zeitung (in German), p. 13
  36. ^ Jürgen Schäfer (17 February 2015), "Signale stehen noch auf Rot", Neue Württembergische Zeitung (in German), p. 13
  37. ^ "Bahn kommt beim Steinbühltunnel schneller voran", Neue Württembergische Zeitung (in German), p. 19, 28 February 2015
  38. ^ a b Heike Allmendinger (3 March 2015), "Tunnelbohrmaschine soll mehr Strecke machen", Esslinger Zeitung (in German), p. 13
  39. ^ a b c d Glück auf, das Käthchen kommt. 2014-10-10.
  40. ^ a b "Tunnelbau: Höheres Tempo nach Umrüstung", Geislinger Zeitung (in German), p. 11, 6 August 2015, archived from the original on 24 September 2015, retrieved 5 July 2016
  41. ^ Ralf Heisele (4 September 2015), "Nichts für Warmduscher", Geislinger Zeitung (in German), p. 19
  42. ^ "News Archiv Detail".
  43. ^ Deutscher Bundestag (Hrsg.): Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Ute Kumpf, Michael Groß, Christian Lange (Backnang), weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der SPD – Drucksache 17/13198 – Sachstand wichtiger Verkehrsprojekte für Baden-Württemberg (PDF; 177 kB). Drucksache 17/13846 vom 6. Juni 2013.
  44. ^ a b Peter Jäckle, Walter Wittke (December 2003), Studiengesellschaft für unterirdische Verkehrsanlagen (ed.), "Grundlagen für wirtschaftliche Entwürfe sowie termin- und kostengerechte Ausführung von Tunnelbauwerken", Tunnel – Lebensadern der Mobilen Gesellschaft (in German), vol. 40, Gütersloh: Bauverlag, pp. 60–66, ISBN 3-7625-3602-3
  45. ^ Joachim Nied, Peter Marquart: Planung, Realisierung und Geologie der Großprojekte Stuttgart 21 und NBS Wendlingen–Ulm. In: Geotechnik, 30 (2007), Nr. 4, ISSN 0172-6145, S. 225–231.
edit
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Boßlertunnel.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boßler_Tunnel&oldid=1245295994"