This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The Bureau of Indian Affairs building takeover refers to a protest by Native Americans at the Department of the Interior headquarters in the United States capital of Washington, D.C., from November 3 to November 9, 1972. On November 3, a group of around 500 American Indians with the American Indian Movement (AIM) took over the Interior building in Washington, D.C.[1] It being the culmination of their cross-country journey in the Trail of Broken Treaties, intended to bring attention to American Indian issues such as living standards and treaty rights.
The incident began with a group of AIM protesters traveling to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) offices at the national headquarters building, intending to negotiate for better housing on reservations and other related issues. But after interpreting a government refusal of their demands as a double cross,[2] the protesters began the siege, occupying the building. And after denying a federal court order to vacate the premises issued after the first night of the occupation.[3] The takeover quickly gained national media attention.
The AIM affiliated protesters overturned tables and desks against windows, fortifying against potential police attack. Some set fires in interior offices and the marble lobbies, destroying many historic documents. The demonstrators started to run out of provisions after several days. They would not allow police or any government representative to approach the building, so two children of BIA employees were recruited to bring in provisions. After a week of occupation, the protesters left, with some taking BIA documents with them, and having caused an estimated $700,000 in damages.[4] And with the loss of the documents, the Washington Post claimed that the destruction and theft of records could set the Bureau of Indian Affairs back 50 to 100 years.[5]
Then President Richard M. Nixon had an interest in promoting tribal sovereignty, as having ended the termination of tribes that was part of 1950s policy. Alongside being interested in the decentralization of government, Nixon fundamentally agreed that tribes should manage their operations. Which as a result of the AIM occupation if the BIA's offices, Nixon signed law the Menominee Restoration Act to restore one tribe to federally recognized status and supported legislation that offered tribes control over their own operations and programs.
Preparation
editAIM members had done research and organized to prepare for their 1972 cross-country journey and anticipated negotiating with the federal government. They researched, organized, and prepared in 1972 after the brief BIA takeover in 1971. Understanding the law was essential to bringing the claims of Indian tribes and the urban populations forward to policy makers and the courts. Volunteer attorneys and other scholars who had studied the laws, executive orders, and BIA budgeting and practices to inform the AIM agenda of exposing government misdirection and illegal practice.
These Indians were concerned about the lands they had lost through treaties, speculation, and corruption. They struggled to make lives on the small areas of reservations, often isolated from population centers.
Momentum and support grew for the AIM among younger Native Americans and First Nations peoples. Unlike in 1971, the groups were prepared and focused on their target. Sympathetic groups joined the planning:
- National Indian Brotherhood of Canada
- Native American Rights Fund
- National Indian Youth Council
- National American Indian Council
- National Council on Indian Work
- National Indian Leadership Training
- American Indian Committee on Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Others who endorsed the effort
edit- Native American Women’s Action Council
- United Native Americans
- National Indian Lutheran Board
- Coalition of Indian-Controlled School Boards
- Black Panther Party for Self Defense
Occupation
editIndians from around the country gathered into groups and converged on the Interior building on November 2, 1972, and stayed there for seven days. As Richard M. Nixon celebrated a landslide presidential victory on November 7 as AIM’s 'Twenty Points' were presented to him. It reminded Nixon how unprepared he was to deal with Indian issues across the country and how he had failed in his effort to quell Indian pressures for reforms.
The twenty points established Native American goals for their relations with the federal government. Twelve of the twenty points directly or indirectly address treaty responsibility in which the U.S. had fallen short.
- Restoration of treaty making (ended by Congress in 1871).
- Establishment of a treaty commission to make new treaties (with sovereign Native Nations).
- Indian leaders to be permitted to address Congress.
- Review of treaty commitments and violations.
- Unratified treaties to go heard by the Senate for action.
- All Indians to be governed by treaty relations.
- Relief for Native Nations for treaty rights violations.
- Recognition of the right of Indians to interpret treaties.
- Joint Congressional Committee to be formed on reconstruction of Indian relations.
- Restoration of 110 million acres (450,000 km2) of land taken away from Native Nations by the United States.
- Restoration of terminated rights.
- Repeal of state jurisdiction on Native Nations.
- Federal protection for offenses against Indians.
- Abolition of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
- Creation of a new office of Federal Indian Relations.
- New office to remedy breakdown in the constitutionally prescribed relationships between the United States and Native Nations.
- Native Nations to be immune to commerce regulation, taxes, trade restrictions of states.
- Indian religious freedom and cultural integrity protected.
- Establishment of national Indian voting with local options; free national Indian organizations from governmental controls
- Reclaim and affirm health, housing, employment, economic development, and education for all Indian people.
According to the Washington Post, during the occupation, Native Americans spent days in the building going through—and taking—files that raised questions about unfair deals on land, water, fishing and mineral rights. Others took artifacts, pottery and artwork that they said belonged to tribes.[6]
Presidential reaction
editAs AIM activists were in the process of occupying the BIA building in Washington, D.C., representatives of the Nixon administration were meeting with tribal chairmen in a scheduled meeting at the other end of the country in rural Oregon. A new organization was established, called The National Tribal Chairman’s Association. The NTCA was presumably an outgrowth of the National Congress of American Indians, founded in 1944. Nixon promised the support of the federal government for "federally recognized" tribes. This excluded groups that had not been recognized, including tribes whose federal status had been terminated in the 1950s under federal policy of the time, which believed that some tribes were "ready" to assimilate into the mainstream.
The NTCA was given offices within the National Council on Indian Opportunity. Tribal chairmen discussed common issues, including how to manage limited resources. Some believed that "urban Indians", those members who had left the reservations to live elsewhere, should be excluded from tribal benefits, although such members often struggled economically even in cities.
When the AIM Protestors left the Interior building on November 8, the White House had agreed to discuss all 20 points except amnesty, which was to be addressed separately. From which an "interagency task force" was created, to be co-chaired by representatives of the White House and to include dozens of Indian organizations. The occupiers then agreed to leave the building with the assurance that the White House would examine eligibility of Indians for governmental services; adequacy of governmental service delivery; quality, speed, and effectiveness of federal programs; Indian self-government; and congressional implementation of necessary Indian legislation.
President Nixon had a different opinion from the 1950s emphasis on termination of tribes and their governments which stood in line with ideas about decentralization of government, he believed that tribes likely could do better than a distant government agency in managing affairs of their people and serving them. On December 22, 1973, Nixon privately signed the Menominee Restoration Act, which returned Menominee Indians to full federally recognized tribal status, returning their land assets to trust status. Nixon might have played more of a leadership role in these issues but was caught up in the Watergate scandal and resigned the next year on August 9, 1974.[7]
Since this event's conclusion, other terminated tribes have regained their federally recognized status by way of Congressional legislation. In addition, other tribes have achieved recognition, both through the BIA's documentary process, a procedure developed in consultation with representatives of recognized tribes, and sometimes through direct Congressional action.[8]
Depiction in popular culture
editThis event is described in the 1990 memoir Lakota Woman by Mary Crow Dog.[9]
References
edit- ^ Blakemore, Erin (2020-11-25). "The radical history of the Red Power movement's fight for Native American sovereignty". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2020-12-31.
- ^ Paul Smith and Robert Warrior, Like a Hurricane: The Indian Movement from Alcatraz to Wounded Knee. New York: The New Press, 1996
- ^ Blair, William M. (1972-11-04). "Indians in Capital Defy a Court Order (Published 1972)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-01-07.
- ^ "Amnesty Denied to Indians". The Washington Post. 10 November 1972.
- ^ "Justice Eyes Way to Charge Indians". The Washington Post. November 10, 1972.
- ^ "The week hundreds of Native Americans took over D.C.'s Bureau of Indian Affairs". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
- ^ Laura Waterman Wittstock, Elaine Salinas, Susan Aasen, Visions and Voices: American Indian Activism and the Civil Rights Movement, Part 1, page 54
- ^ "Federal Register :: Request Access". unblock.federalregister.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-03.
- ^ Crow Dog, Mary (1990). Lakota Woman. Grove Weidenfeld.
External links
edit- Jason Heppler, Framing Red Power: Newspapers, the Trail of Broken Treaties, and the Politics of Media, an Internet history project, 2009-2016, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, includes links to extensive primary sources, including media