Cambridge University (UK Parliament constituency)
Cambridge University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950.
Cambridge University | |
---|---|
Former university constituency for the House of Commons | |
1603–1950 | |
Seats | 2 |
Replaced by | Cambridge |
Franchise and method of election
editThis university constituency was created by a Royal Charter of 1603. It was abolished in 1950 by the Representation of the People Act 1948.
The constituency was not a geographical area. Its electorate consisted of the graduates of the University of Cambridge. Before 1918 the franchise was restricted to male graduates with a Doctorate or Master of Arts degree. Sedgwick records that there were 377 electors in 1727. For the 1754–1790 period, Namier and Brooke estimated the electorate at about 500.
The constituency returned two Members of Parliament. Before 1918 they were elected by plurality-at-large voting, but from 1918 onwards the two members were elected by the Single Transferable Vote method.
History
editIn the early 18th century, the electors of both English universities were mostly Tories, but the Whig ministers of King George I were able to persuade him to use his royal prerogative to confer Cambridge doctorates on a large number of Whigs, so that from 1727 the university largely returned Whig representatives. At Oxford, the King did not enjoy the same prerogative power, so that the University of Oxford constituency remained Tory, and indeed often Jacobite, in its preferences.
The leading 18th-century Whig politician Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle, was Chancellor of the University of Cambridge from 1748 to 1768 and recommended to the electors suitable candidates to represent them in Parliament. This practice continued under his successor, another Whig Duke and Prime Minister, Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton, Chancellor of the university from 1768 to 1811. However, Grafton was less influential as a politician than Newcastle had been and also less attentive towards the university, and as a result some of his nominations came in for criticism, notably that of his friend Richard Croftes.
Croftes was far from typical of a university member of parliament: he was neither the son of a peer, like the Hon. John Townshend, the Marquess of Granby, and Grafton's own son the Earl of Euston, nor a distinguished lawyer-politician, such as William de Grey, James Mansfield, and Sir Vicary Gibbs, nor a prominent political figure like William Pitt the Younger and Lord Henry Petty. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Pittite and Tory candidates began to be elected. At the appearance of this political development, some of the Pittite members, including the younger William Pitt himself, one of the members for the university from 1784 to 1806, described themselves as Whigs. As time passed, the division between the 19th century Tory and Whig parties became clearer.
The future Prime Minister, Viscount Palmerston, retained his university seat as a Whig after he left the Tory ranks, but in 1831 he was defeated. After Palmerston ceased to represent the university he was elected by a territorial constituency. From then until the 1920s, all of the university's members were Tories and/or Conservatives.
Even after the introduction of the single transferable vote in 1918, most of the members continued to be elected as Conservatives.
Members of Parliament
editThis is a list of people who have been elected to represent this university in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
1603 to 1660
edit- Constituency created 1603
Year | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1604 | Nicholas Steward | Henry Mountlow |
1614 | Sir Miles Sandys | Sir Francis Bacon |
1621 | Robert Naunton | Barnaby Gough |
1624 | Sir Robert Naunton | Barnaby Gough |
1625 | Sir Robert Naunton | Sir Albert Morton |
1626 | Thomas Eden | Sir John Coke |
1628–1629 | Thomas Eden | Sir John Coke |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments summoned | |
Apr 1640 | Thomas Eden | Henry Lucas |
Nov 1640 | Thomas Eden | Henry Lucas |
Eden died 1644 replaced by Nathaniel Bacon | ||
1648 | Lucas secluded in Pride's Purge | |
1654 | Henry Cromwell | (one seat only) |
1656 | Richard Cromwell | (one seat only) |
1659 | John Thurloe | Thomas Sclater |
1660 to 1784
editYear | Member | Party | Member | Party |
---|---|---|---|---|
1660 Apr | George Monck | Thomas Crouch | ||
1660 Jun | William Montagu | |||
1661 | Sir Richard Fanshawe | |||
1667 | Sir Charles Wheler, 2nd Baronet | |||
1679 | Sir Thomas Exton | James Vernon | ||
1681 | Robert Brady | |||
1689 | Sir Robert Sawyer | Isaac Newton | Whig | |
1690 | Edward Finch | |||
1692 | Henry Boyle | Whig | ||
1695 | George Oxenden | |||
1698 | Anthony Hammond | |||
1701 | Isaac Newton | Court Whig | ||
1702 | Arthur Annesley | Tory | ||
1705 | Dixie Windsor | Tory | ||
1710 | Thomas Paske | Tory | ||
1720 | Thomas Willoughby | Tory | ||
1727 | Edward Finch | Whig | Thomas Townshend | Whig |
1768 | Charles Yorke | Rockingham Whig | ||
1770 | William de Grey | |||
1771 | Richard Croftes | |||
1774 | Charles Manners, Marquess of Granby | |||
1779 | James Mansfield | |||
1780 | Lord John Townshend | Whig |
1784 to 1950
editNotes:-
- 1 Pitt called himself a Whig, but is usually retrospectively regarded as a Tory since most of his followers (whether their background was in the Whig or Tory tradition) came to call themselves the Tory Party in the decade after Pitt's death.
- 2 Jebb died on 10 December 1905 – seat vacant at dissolution.
- 3 Co. is an abbreviation for Coalition.
- 4 Ind. is an abbreviation for Independent.
- 5 Sir Geoffrey G. Butler died on 2 May 1929 – seat vacant at dissolution.
Elections before 1715
editElection by block vote 1715–1918
edit
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s – 1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s |
Elections in the 1710s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Dixie Windsor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Paske | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1720s
edit- Death of Paske
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Willoughby | 176 | 55.17 | N/A | |
Whig | Henry Finch | 143 | 44.83 | N/A | |
Majority | 33 | 10.34 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 319 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1722): Stooks Smith gives Willoughby 319 votes.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Dixie Windsor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Willoughby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | 221 | 37.14 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | 198 | 33.28 | N/A | |
Tory | Dixie Windsor | 176 | 29.58 | N/A | |
Turnout | 595 (377 voted) | 79.70 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 473 |
- Note (1727): Unusually, for a pre-1832 election, Stooks Smith records the total number of electors for the constituency as well as the number who voted; so a turnout figure can be calculated.
Elections in the 1730s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Townshend | 222 | 30.33 | −2.95 | |
Whig | Edward Finch | 209 | 28.55 | −8.59 | |
Whig | Goodrick | 174 | 23.77 | N/A | |
Tory | Dixie Windsor | 137 | 17.35 | −12.23 | |
Turnout | 732 | N/A | N/A |
- Note (1734): Goodrick was an Opposition Whig
Elections in the 1740s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed a Groom of the Bedchamber
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1750s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1760s
edit- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | Charles Yorke | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1770s
edit- Seat vacated on the appointment of Yorke as Lord Chancellor
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | William de Grey | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of de Grey as Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | Richard Croftes | 76 | 62.81 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | William Wynne | 45 | 37.19 | N/A | |
Majority | 31 | 25.62 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 121 | N/A | N/A | ||
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | Charles Manners | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non-partisan | Richard Croftes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Succession of Granby as the 4th Duke of Rutland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | James Mansfield | 157 | 35.68 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | John Townshend | 145 | 32.95 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | Thomas Villiers | 138 | 31.36 | N/A | |
Majority | 12 | 2.73 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 440 | N/A | N/A | ||
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1780s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | James Mansfield | 277 | 27.10 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | John Townshend | 247 | 24.17 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | Thomas Villiers | 206 | 20.16 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | Richard Croftes | 150 | 14.68 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | William Pitt | 142 | 13.89 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,022 (546 voters) | N/A | N/A |
- Note (1780): Stooks Smith records Townshend as getting 237 votes.
- Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | John Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | John Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on Mansfield being appointed as Solicitor General for England and Wales
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | James Mansfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non-partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-partisan | William Pitt | 351 | 31.65 | +17.76 | |
Non-partisan | George FitzRoy | 299 | 26.96 | N/A | |
Non-partisan | John Townshend | 278 | 25.07 | +0.90 | |
Non-partisan | James Mansfield | 181 | 16.32 | −10.78 | |
Turnout | 1,109 (588 voters) | N/A | N/A |
- The 1784 election was broadly a contest between the new government of Pitt and the ousted Fox-North Coalition, in which both Townshend and Mansfield had held office.
Elections in the 1790s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Pitt | 510 | 42.50 | +10.85 | |
Whig | George FitzRoy | 483 | 40.25 | +13.29 | |
Whig | Lawrence Dundas | 207 | 17.25 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,200 (684 voters) | N/A | N/A |
- Note (1790): Party labels in the 1790–1832 period follow Stooks Smith, who classifies Pitt and his Pittite supporters as Tories without regard to what they would have actually called themselves.
- Seat vacated on Pitt being appointed Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on Euston being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George FitzRoy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | George FitzRoy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1800s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | George FitzRoy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated on Pitt being appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
- Death of Pitt
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Petty | 331 | 54.80 | N/A | |
Whig | John Spencer | 145 | 24.01 | N/A | |
Tory | Henry Temple | 128 | 21.19 | N/A | |
Majority | 186 | 30.79 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 604 | N/A | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A |
- Palmerston was a Peer of Ireland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Petty | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | George FitzRoy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George FitzRoy | 324 | 26.75 | N/A | |
Tory | Vicary Gibbs | 312 | 25.76 | New | |
Tory | Henry Temple | 310 | 25.60 | New | |
Whig | Henry Petty | 265 | 21.88 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,211 (631 voters) | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1810s
edit- Succession of Euston as the 4th Duke of Grafton
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Temple | 451 | 56.66 | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | 345 | 43.34 | N/A | |
Majority | 106 | 13.32 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 796 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on Gibbs being appointed a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1820s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Temple | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Smyth
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William John Bankes | 419 | 45.59 | N/A | |
Tory | Lord Harvey | 281 | 30.58 | N/A | |
Whig | James Scarlett | 219 | 23.83 | N/A | |
Majority | 138 | 15.02 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 919 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Copley | 772 | 32.88 | N/A | |
Whig | Henry Temple | 631 | 26.87 | N/A | |
Tory | William John Bankes | 508 | 21.64 | N/A | |
Tory | Henry Goulburn | 437 | 18.61 | N/A | |
Majority | 123 | 5.23 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,348 (1,293 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Copley as Lord Chancellor and creation as 1st Baron Lyndhurst
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Nicholas Conyngham Tindal | 479 | 55.89 | N/A | |
Tory | William John Bankes | 378 | 44.11 | N/A | |
Majority | 101 | 11.78 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 857 | 43.93 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,951 | ||||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1827): Unusually for a pre-1832 election Stooks Smith provides a total electorate figure, so a turnout percentage can be calculated. See the 1727 result above for another instance.
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Tindal as Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Cavendish | 609 | 56.86 | N/A | |
Tory | George Bankes | 462 | 43.14 | −0.97 | |
Majority | 147 | 13.72 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,071 | ||||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing |
Elections in the 1830s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Temple | Unopposed | |||
Whig | William Cavendish | Unopposed | |||
Whig gain from Tory | |||||
Whig gain from Tory |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Palmerston as Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Temple | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Goulburn | 805 | 28.3 | ||
Tory | William Yates Peel | 804 | 28.2 | ||
Whig | William Cavendish | 630 | 22.1 | ||
Whig | Henry Temple | 610 | 21.4 | ||
Majority | 174 | 6.1 | |||
Turnout | 1,450 | 65.5 | |||
Registered electors | 2,215 | ||||
Tory gain from Whig | |||||
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Speaker | Charles Manners-Sutton | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,319 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Speaker gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Speaker | Charles Manners-Sutton | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,319 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Speaker hold |
- Manners-Sutton created 'The 1st Viscount Canterbury'.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Law | Unopposed | |||
Conservative gain from Speaker |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Charles Law | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,613 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Speaker |
- Note (1837): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Law as a Peelite between this election and that of 1847.
Elections in the 1840s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Charles Law | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,873 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Note (1841): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.
- Goulburn appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Law | 1,486 | 31.7 | N/A | |
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | 1,189 | 25.4 | N/A | |
Conservative | Rudolph Feilding | 1,147 | 24.5 | N/A | |
Whig | John Shaw-Lefevre | 860 | 18.4 | New | |
Majority | 42 | 0.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,341 (est) | 61.6 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 3,800 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note 1 (1847): 3,800 registered electors; 4,682 votes cast; minimum possible turnout estimated by dividing votes by 2. To the extent that electors did not use both their votes, the figure will be an underestimate.
- Note 2 (1847): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.
Elections in the 1850s
edit- Death of Law.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,063 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Note (1852): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative for this election.
- Death of Goulburn.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | 886 | 67.9 | N/A | |
Whig | George Denman[4] | 419 | 32.1 | New | |
Majority | 467 | 35.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,305 | 28.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 4,552 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,552 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Appointment of Walpole as Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,566 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,184 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Appointment of Walpole as Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Appointment of Selwyn as Solicitor-General.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Appointment of Selwyn as Judge of the Court of Appeal in Chancery.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | 1,931 | 58.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | Anthony Cleasby[5] | 1,400 | 42.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 531 | 16.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,331 | 64.3 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 5,184 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,435 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1870s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,855 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1880s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 6,161 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Walpole's resignation caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Cecil Raikes | 3,491 | 72.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | James Stuart | 1,301 | 27.2 | New | |
Majority | 2,190 | 45.7 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,792 | 75.2 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 6,371 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Raikes was appointed Postmaster General, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Beresford-Hope's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Stokes | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1890s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1900s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Butcher | 3,050 | 39.72 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Rawlinson | 2,976 | 38.76 | N/A | |
Free Trader | John Eldon Gorst | 1,653 | 21.53 | New | |
Majority | 1,323 | 17.23 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,063 | 65.8 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 6,972 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1910s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Butcher | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Rawlinson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Butcher | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Rawlinson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Joseph Larmor | 2,308 | 50.24 | N/A | |
Free Trade | Harold Cox | 1,954 | 42.53 | New | |
Ind. Conservative | Thomas Ethelbert Page | 332 | 7.23 | New | |
Majority | 354 | 7.71 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,129 | 64.44 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections 1918–1950
editGeneral elections from 1918, when most constituencies polled on the same day, were on different polling days than for territorial constituencies. The polls for university constituencies were open for five days. The elections were conducted by Single Transferable Vote.
Elections in the 1910s
editParty | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
C | Coalition Unionist | John Rawlinson | 35.16 | 2,034 | |
C | Coalition Unionist | Joseph Larmor | 32.69 | 1,891 | 1,986 |
Independent | William Cecil Dampier | 21.09 | 1,220 | 1,229 | |
Labour | J. C. Squire | 11.06 | 640 | 641 | |
Electorate: 9,282 Valid: 5,785 Quota: 1,929 Turnout: 62.32% C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Elections in the 1920s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | John Rawlinson | 4,192 | 49.39 | +14.23 | |
Independent Liberal | J. R. M. Butler | 3,453 | 39.86 | New | |
Unionist | William Ritchie Sorley | 1,018 | 11.75 | New | |
Majority | 2,435 | 28.11 | N/A | ||
Quota | 2,888 | ||||
Registered electors | 13,592 | ||||
Turnout | 8,663 | 63.74 | |||
Independent Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | N/A |
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | John Rawlinson | 40.85 | 4,207 | ||
Unionist | Geoffrey G. Butler | 27.61 | 2,844 | 3,560 | |
Independent Liberal | J. R. M. Butler | 31.54 | 3,248 | 3,283 | |
Electorate: 14,974 Valid: 10,229 Quota: 3,434 Turnout: 68.78% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | John Rawlinson | 4,569 | 38.60 | −2.25 | |
Unionist | Geoffrey G. Butler | 4,026 | 34.01 | +6.40 | |
Independent Liberal | J. R. M. Butler | 3,241 | 27.38 | −4.16 | |
Majority | 785 | 6.63 | |||
Quota | 3,946 | ||||
Registered electors | 16,621 | ||||
Turnout | 11,836 | 71.21 | +2.43 | ||
Unionist hold | Swing |
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | John Withers | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | John Withers | 39.76 | 6,356 | ||
Unionist | Godfrey Wilson | 31.71 | 5,069 | 6,046 | |
Liberal | Hubert Henderson | 19.38 | 3,099 | 3,131 | |
Labour | Alexander Wood | 9.15 | 1,463 | 1,480 | |
Electorate: 23,978 Valid: 15,987 Quota: 5,330 Turnout: 66.67 |
Elections in the 1930s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Godfrey Wilson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | John Withers | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Kenneth Pickthorn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Withers | 7,602 | 42.30 | N/A | |
Conservative | Kenneth Pickthorn | 6,917 | 38.49 | N/A | |
Labour | Lionel Elvin | 3,453 | 19.21 | New | |
Majority | 3,464 | 19.28 | N/A | ||
Quota | 5,991 | ||||
Registered electors | 33,617 | ||||
Turnout | 17,972 | 53.46 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing |
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
Elections in the 1940s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ind. Conservative | Archibald Hill | 9,840 | 64.62 | New | |
Independent Progressive | John Ryle | 5,387 | 35.38 | New | |
Majority | 4,453 | 29.24 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 39,171 | 38.87 | N/A | ||
Ind. Conservative gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
Conservative | Kenneth Pickthorn | 46.18 | 10,202 | ||||
Independent | Wilson Harris | 16.18 | 3,574 | 4,709 | 5,185 | 6,556 | |
Independent Progressive | J. B. Priestley | 22.82 | 5,041 | 5,128 | 5,238 | 5,745 | |
Independent | Charles Hill | 10.13 | 2,238 | 3,092 | 3,595 | eliminated | |
National | Ernest Leslie Howard-Williams | 4.69 | 1,036 | 1,798 | eliminated | – | |
Electorate: 42,012 Valid: 22,091 Quota: 7,364 Turnout: 52.58 |
See also
editReferences
edit- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885–1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press, revised edition 1977)
- McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book: British Election Results 1832–1918 (8th edition, The Harvester Press 1971)
- The House of Commons 1715–1754, by Romney Sedgwick (HMSO 1970)
- The House of Commons 1754–1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832–1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886–1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919–1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume IV 1945–1979, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1981)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "C" (part 1)
- Specific
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 28–31. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- ^ a b c Fisher, David R. "Cambridge University". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ "Cambridge University Election". Yorkshire Gazette. 9 February 1856. p. 3. Retrieved 14 September 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Cambridge University Election". Cambridge Independent Press. 29 February 1868. p. 5. Retrieved 1 February 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.