Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A.

Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson.

Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 30, 2024
Full case name	Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A.
Citations	602 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
The Second Circuit failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
Majority	Kavanaugh, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson

External links

• Text of Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A., 602 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)