This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Additional information:
/
This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've read the warning about nobody looking at Category Talk Pages, but I thought I'd post this and let it sizzle for a while. Is it preferable to list a unit by its designation when it was assigned to Air/Aerospace Defense Command, or by its current designation (which is probably the location of its article. An example is 15th Fighter Group -- the 1950s designation of the unit while it was in ADC and 15th Wing -- its current designation.) The group is a redirect to the wing, so no matter which you choose, you get the information Wiki has, but putting the category box on the redirect page makes this page look more accurate. I'll probably be bold and keep on adding italicized entries to this category until someone asks me to stop and explains why, though.--Lineagegeek (talk) 22:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
