This category is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Please stop incorrect wikiprojects and boilerplate
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Dimadick This category has NOTHING to do with law enforcement or the subject covered in use of force. It could also be titled "Aggression in international law" or "Armed attack in international law", but simply follows the already existing article use of force by states (although this title is really misleading and probably should be changed). (t · c) buidhe17:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
But the article use of force already adresses use of force by military personnel. What is the purpose of a separate article on its use by states? Dimadick (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've nominated that article to be moved to aggression in international law to clarify the scope. Because it does NOT mean use of force by military personnel, but only interstate acts of aggression ( = invasions, wars, drone strikes, etc.) in the context of international law prohibition on such acts of interstate aggression. (t · c) buidhe17:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
