Category talk:Aggression in international law

Please stop incorrect wikiprojects and boilerplate

edit

Dimadick This category has NOTHING to do with law enforcement or the subject covered in use of force. It could also be titled "Aggression in international law" or "Armed attack in international law", but simply follows the already existing article use of force by states (although this title is really misleading and probably should be changed). (t · c) buidhe 17:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

But the article use of force already adresses use of force by military personnel. What is the purpose of a separate article on its use by states? Dimadick (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've nominated that article to be moved to aggression in international law to clarify the scope. Because it does NOT mean use of force by military personnel, but only interstate acts of aggression ( = invasions, wars, drone strikes, etc.) in the context of international law prohibition on such acts of interstate aggression. (t · c) buidhe 17:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply