Category talk:Animal anatomy
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Jrockley in topic Animal anatomy
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Animal anatomy
editFFFI have beenmassively boost the amount of information Wikipedia provides on animal anatomy but right now it not :
- [[animal anatomyvuyf
]] or zootomy - the parent page (perhaps with this article merged into it)
- vertebrate anatomy
- mammal anatomy (perhaps also marsupial anatomy and montreme anatomy)
- bird anatomy - there is already a bird skeleton article, and more than enough info can be taken from the bird articlenatomy]] (as of 08/05/06 redirects to reptile)
- amphibian anatomy
- bony fish anatomy
- invertebrate anatomy
- crustacean anatomy
- insect anatomy etc...
- vertebrate anatomy
- The list could go on forever, I'm not sure whether ALL the possible articles deserve to exist, but most certainly the mammal/bird/reptile/amphibian/fish ones do, as that is what we all grown up with as the five main animal groups from early school. These article currently exist to deal with this field:
- cat anatomy - poor
- dog anatomy - good, but isn't really anatomy, more their physical appearance
- frog zoology - good
- [category:horse anatomy] - a whole category, with articles such as equine forelimb anatomy
- [catagory:marsupial zootomy]
- [catagory:dog anatomy]
- bird skeleton - good
- I have to admit I am no expert, I propose this in the hope that someone who is can help. What does everyone think? mastodon 15:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)