Category talk:Coherency templates
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Senator2029 in topic Inline coherency templates
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
June 2007
editMore templates needed:
- One for sentence structure: in order to mark that a text for containing too many subordinate clauses, or a confusing order of subordinate clauses; the same template should be used for mysterious jumps from topic to topic in a text,
- One for nonexistent words or terms: most commonly caused by inadvertedly confusing terms from languages not English, such as me myself using Swedish terms by mistake in an English text,
- One for term ambiguity: an ambiguous term easily causes confusion and contradictions in an article – all ambiguous terms shall be analysed according to the multitude of definitions,
- One for term overlap: f.ex. when term 1 is put in contrast to term 2, but in fact there are cases when both apply.
I have requested for term ambiguity HERE, and HERE. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 15:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Inline coherency templates
editShould the inline coherency templates, such as {{Clarifyme}}, be in here (or maybe a subcategory of this one)? --Snigbrook (talk) 15:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- That's a good idea worth discussing at the WikiProject Inline Templates talk page. —Senator2029 | talk 01:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)